eracles wrote:Well I thought Expatkiwis post was sensible but of course Yfronts has to ruin it all
Ah reh yerocleos, bu ise, bos bais gumbare. Do you have any?
Malapapa wrote:YFred wrote:Expatkiwi wrote:RoCy should look at the positive aspects. They would at least be talking to Turkey directly, and they could always refer to the TRNC delegation as the "Turkish Cypriot Community of Cyprus", if it will make them feel better...
You must not assume that GC Administration has any imagination. Zilch, I am afraid.
It imaginatively calls itself the "Republic of Cyprus" - and the whole world accepts this imagination. It even, imaginatively, has a senior government official of Armenian descent. Maybe you're the one who has no imagination. Zilch, I am afraid.
YFred wrote:Malapapa wrote:YFred wrote:Expatkiwi wrote:RoCy should look at the positive aspects. They would at least be talking to Turkey directly, and they could always refer to the TRNC delegation as the "Turkish Cypriot Community of Cyprus", if it will make them feel better...
You must not assume that GC Administration has any imagination. Zilch, I am afraid.
It imaginatively calls itself the "Republic of Cyprus" - and the whole world accepts this imagination. It even, imaginatively, has a senior government official of Armenian descent. Maybe you're the one who has no imagination. Zilch, I am afraid.
No, it was stolen, not imaginative at all!
AWE wrote:back to the thread.
I understand why the RoC does not want 5 way talks under the UN with perhaps the EU and US as observers as they are fearful and it becoming AP5.
That said with the current talks going nowhere and the EU review of Turkey's accession process in December and a presidential election the the TRNC in April if the parties really do want a solution this century then this is about the only option.
vaughanwilliams wrote:I think the RoC is being too sensitive about their perceived "status" at such a meeting. There are two main parties here GC's and TC's - forget about who is legally recognised and who isn't. The other three parties are interested parties in being Motherlands and/or in the case of Britain, as a guarantor.
If RoC maintains this stance it is saying that, for the sake of political point scoring, it doesn't really care enough to want to resolve this long overdue issue with the TRNC.
Malapapa wrote:vaughanwilliams wrote:I think the RoC is being too sensitive about their perceived "status" at such a meeting. There are two main parties here GC's and TC's - forget about who is legally recognised and who isn't. The other three parties are interested parties in being Motherlands and/or in the case of Britain, as a guarantor.
If RoC maintains this stance it is saying that, for the sake of political point scoring, it doesn't really care enough to want to resolve this long overdue issue with the TRNC.
The establishment of a "Turkish Republic" in Cyprus, for political point scoring, is the issue. By maintaining this illegitimate entity and protecting it with 40,000 troops it shows Turkey has never really cared enough to want to resolve this long overdue issue with Cyprus.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest