YFred wrote:Malapapa wrote:
Why should an innocent victim of common theft have more protection than an innocent victim of war?
The victim of the common theft is the victim of the thief, the victim of war is the victim of their own government.
Are they? What rubbish. And even if they were, how does this make them less innocent? Less of a victim?
YFred wrote:You'll find Sampson may have something to do with it.
Was he democratically elected?
YFred wrote:One thing for sure, the two are not the same. And a judge that does not see that is blind.
You, I'm afraid, are the one who is blind.
