The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Water Found on Moon, Scientists Say

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby fig head » Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:41 pm

Oracle wrote:
Jasonahed wrote:
Oracle wrote:Which begs the question: if there is so much water there; why did Armstrong and Aldrin "fail" to detect any when they "walked" (?) on the moon? We all know a few simple tests for the presence of water, don't we? :lol: Surely they didn't "forget" to check?


Water, water everywhere ....


What makes you think that the space mission back then even took place? it was all staged don't forget, it was a desperate act by the yanks to show it was possible for them to get to the moon, its all a fake. Everybody knows that leaving the earths van allan belt would be suicide.


Welcome on board Jasonahed. :D

Do you also believe the earth is flat?

Whilst I was merely parodying the typical sceptic of moon landings and Man's Giant Leap .... I admit they have been given ample ammunition with the recent claim of quite how much water there is on the moon.

How did they fail to detect it in the first place is my (genuine) scientific question. I really want to know if Physicists live in this sterile world without a clue about how to look for signs of/for life!

Having said that, whatever the barriers, I believe Man can overcome and van allen belts or "falling off the end of the earth" scares will not last for long!


may be, just may where they landed in the moon heir was no water!!!
P.s seems like im not the only one with good questions :D
User avatar
fig head
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4122
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 12:16 pm
Location: some where no one knows. Secret location.

Postby Oracle » Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:50 pm

fig head wrote:
Oracle wrote:
Jasonahed wrote:
Oracle wrote:Which begs the question: if there is so much water there; why did Armstrong and Aldrin "fail" to detect any when they "walked" (?) on the moon? We all know a few simple tests for the presence of water, don't we? :lol: Surely they didn't "forget" to check?


Water, water everywhere ....


What makes you think that the space mission back then even took place? it was all staged don't forget, it was a desperate act by the yanks to show it was possible for them to get to the moon, its all a fake. Everybody knows that leaving the earths van allan belt would be suicide.


Welcome on board Jasonahed. :D

Do you also believe the earth is flat?

Whilst I was merely parodying the typical sceptic of moon landings and Man's Giant Leap .... I admit they have been given ample ammunition with the recent claim of quite how much water there is on the moon.

How did they fail to detect it in the first place is my (genuine) scientific question. I really want to know if Physicists live in this sterile world without a clue about how to look for signs of/for life!

Having said that, whatever the barriers, I believe Man can overcome and van allen belts or "falling off the end of the earth" scares will not last for long!


may be, just may where they landed in the moon heir was no water!!!
P.s seems like im not the only one with good questions :D


I'd like a scientific answer, not an excuse! :lol:

If they had the scientific know-how to travel that far and return ... then the equipment for detecting water should have been a little more sophisticated than merely relying on having bucket-loads before detection.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby yialousa1971 » Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:02 pm

Funny how these scientists always say man must have gone to the Moon because of the refectors they placed there. Yet the Russians managed to place two there in unmaned missions. :?
User avatar
yialousa1971
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6260
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:55 pm
Location: With my friends on the Cyprus forum

Previous

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest