The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Beware of Brits bearing "Gifts" ...

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby kafenes » Sat Nov 28, 2009 12:45 am

Could it be that Britain now feels guilty for not warning the carpetbaggers when they were purchasing stolen land and now, to get them out of hot water, feels they can do an exchange with the land on the bases?
User avatar
kafenes
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 2:43 am
Location: Paphos

Postby AWE » Sat Nov 28, 2009 3:04 am

Malapapa wrote:
Get Real! wrote:The Treaty of Guarantee fails the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties thus rendering it invalid…

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle17.htm


The treaty is more than invalid, Britain is in breech. Here's another link that legal minded Cypriot government officials might wish to investigate going forward, if Turkey chooses not to join civilisation soon...

http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?p1=1

All three guarantors would be in the dock.


And they would have to agree to be in the dock, which I guess they will not do.

http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php? ... ontentious
User avatar
AWE
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:50 pm
Location: Can't say - GPS has died!

Postby SKI-preo » Sat Nov 28, 2009 3:40 am

ExpatKiwi wrote "A lot of countries had similar histories: USA, Canada, Mexico, Australia to name a few."

In most of the examples you have provided the legal entitlements of indigenous people have been given meaningful recognition.
In Australia Indigenous Australians have been granted Native Title to huge tracts of land which is highly valuable in terms of mineral resources and tourism and in the USA First Nation people have had their land rights recognized and they are even allowed to operate casinos. Neither of these peoples had Title Deeds(legal title) and in Australia land use by most Native groups was not in accordance with the formal requirements of ownership (Mabo). I have registered legal Title deeds to property which is recognized at law internationally and through Europe and yet you are trying to say this is of no consequence based purely on the fact that you do not like my ethnic background. The Geneva Convention on Human Rights cannot be breached simply because you hate Greeks.

This is primitive dark age uncivilized logic.
User avatar
SKI-preo
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1361
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:17 am
Location: New Zealand/Australia

Postby Expatkiwi » Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:35 am

SKI-preo wrote:ExpatKiwi wrote "A lot of countries had similar histories: USA, Canada, Mexico, Australia to name a few."

In most of the examples you have provided the legal entitlements of indigenous people have been given meaningful recognition.
In Australia Indigenous Australians have been granted Native Title to huge tracts of land which is highly valuable in terms of mineral resources and tourism and in the USA First Nation people have had their land rights recognized and they are even allowed to operate casinos. Neither of these peoples had Title Deeds(legal title) and in Australia land use by most Native groups was not in accordance with the formal requirements of ownership (Mabo). I have registered legal Title deeds to property which is recognized at law internationally and through Europe and yet you are trying to say this is of no consequence based purely on the fact that you do not like my ethnic background. The Geneva Convention on Human Rights cannot be breached simply because you hate Greeks.

This is primitive dark age uncivilized logic.


Your ethnic background has nothing to do with my stance. It's what your brethern had tried to do to the Turkish Cypriots in the past that made me choose...
User avatar
Expatkiwi
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Previous

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests