by bill cobbett » Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:36 am
Anyway, and with greetings to our new readers in the Occupied North will, press on ....
Mr A then turned to the application from the British Residents Society (Association ???), who Jerry found out are the "others" referred to in the action. Again Mr A condemns the late application and an attempt to admit new evidence which he further condemns in it's various refs to the laws of the Tnucland.
Mr A says this is the BRS ..."coming to this court and saying the ECJ got it wrong"....
On the BRS Mr A goes further and says ..."there is no other state"... , the ECJ was right to ignore """trnc"""" law. Mr A says that the RoC would have been showing "dereliction in its duties if it didn't try to execute its judgements in its sovereign territory ."
Also in response to the BRS Mr A enters a couple of legal authorities, the Manual of Armed Conflict and one other in support of the illegal status of Tnucland and its laws.
Mr A goes on to say that accepting the BRS submission would be contrary to GB treaty obligations, UN Resolutions and others which respect the integrity, sovereignty, jurisdiction of the RoC.
Mr A finishes by asking for an order to action the CY court order and costs.
As Jerry posts above, at this stage, another barrister, who was there for the two days, and who we believe was acting for the BRS rose and tried to submit an application. The Presiding Judge refused the application at this late stage. The barrister sat down.
For the last twenty minutes of the day, the O's QC gave a summary of their grounds for application, asking for a referral back to the ECJ of all five questions with the bias claim.
At the end the Presiding Judge said judgement would be reserved and a draft judgement issued (no indication of when, could be days or weeks and weeks) with the final judgement two days subsequently.