Piratis wrote:YFred wrote:Expatkiwi wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Thats exactly why we cannot agree a solution due to the chasm being so wide, neither side is willing to accept its wrongs and therefore compromise enough to find middle ground that we can commit to. The ball game chnaged in 1974 with not only our contribution but also yours so as you have already accepted. There is no going back and seeing the division isin place you have no other choice but to accept the reality before you, because you if you had any a choice you would reject BBF tomorrow so in reality you have made no compromise whatsoever, its a result of your own actions.
That's it in a nutshell, but the folk down south really are too hard-headed to admit this. ..
Not everyone in the south is like the hard headed forumers. The atitudes are changing. They do realise the consequences of another GC no vote.
There will not be another GC no vote simply because there will not be another referendum until you drop your ridiculous demands and accept something reasonable. Until then we can negotiate for decades as far as I am concerned. Or of course you can drop out of the negotiations. Your choice.
I am not too sure about this, Piratis.. Christofias seems to be heading straight for a referendum on an Annan-like solution, in the hope that GC will be blackmailed into accepting it (his plan for "cementing the Yes" per 2004).
GCs, however, despite what he thinks, will give a second No.
It is such a shame, in my view.. if he were a realist (as he claims), he should be putting forward a BBF which is ACCEPTABLE to GC people (and not an AP lookalike), supporting his positions based on human rigths, EU law etc and blocking Turkey's EU process until this BBF was accepted by Turkey.
The above is the ONLY strategy that could deliver a solution.