The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Mercury poisoning- toxicity

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby michalis5354 » Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:41 pm

I know the initial article is very long but the point is that mercury a highly toxic material that the dentist use every day to restore decayed tooth can directly affect your well being and health in the long run!
User avatar
michalis5354
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 10:48 am

Postby petethegreek » Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:42 pm

michalis5354 wrote:I know the initial article is very long but the point is that mercury a highly toxic material that the dentist use every day to restore decayed tooth can directly affect your well being and health in the long run!


But why r u posing this in the Cyprus Forum?

Are people in Cyprus more likely to be affected by this?
petethegreek
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 775
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 4:57 pm
Location: Londino, Anglia

Postby michalis5354 » Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:44 pm

If you are not interested then dont read it !
User avatar
michalis5354
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 10:48 am

Postby petethegreek » Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:45 pm

michalis5354 wrote:If you are not interested then dont read it !


If its meaningless then dont write it.
petethegreek
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 775
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 4:57 pm
Location: Londino, Anglia

Postby city » Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:47 pm

petethegreek wrote:But why r u posing this in the Cyprus Forum?

Are people in Cyprus more likely to be affected by this?


come on Pete, this is the general section. some people might have other interests as well, not only the CyProb. :-)
User avatar
city
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Germany

Postby michalis5354 » Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:48 pm

petethegreek wrote:
michalis5354 wrote:If you are not interested then dont read it !


If its meaningless then dont write it.


Sorry but you seem very stupid! If you are not interested then ignore it like I ignore other post!
User avatar
michalis5354
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 10:48 am

Postby petethegreek » Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:48 pm

city wrote:
petethegreek wrote:But why r u posing this in the Cyprus Forum?

Are people in Cyprus more likely to be affected by this?


come on Pete, this is the general section. some people might have other interests as well, not only the CyProb. :-)


Mercury poisoning? R u having a laugh City.

What r ur views on the subject then?
petethegreek
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 775
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 4:57 pm
Location: Londino, Anglia

Postby city » Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:52 pm

pete :-) I just meant, that this is the section of the forum for all sorts of posts, whatever interests us or crosses our mind for some reason.

I had my amalgam fillings removed, as I stated above, and as the material is blocked for further use in Germany. :-)
User avatar
city
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Germany

Postby devil » Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:56 am

I have more than a passing knowledge of both toxicology and epidemiology, having been involved in industrial health and safety, so I can speak with a certain amount of authority.

First of all, mercury is NOT toxic. You could swallow several grams of it and it would pass through the body unaltered and with no toxic effects. What IS toxic are some compounds of mercury, notably some organic compounds, known as organometallics. These are a cumulative CNS toxin. Some mercuric halides are also equally toxic, especially HgCl2.

Mercury amalgams used for dental obturations are usually trinary alloys (sometimes ternary) and the mercury forms an intermetallic compound with the silver. The important point is that there is no free mercury in the alloy: it is all bound up with the silver in a distinctive eutectic phase which is formed in the first hours after mixing the components. This intermetallic compound has been shown to be virtually non-toxic under normal conditions found in the mouth, because the phase is non-reversible until it reaches liquidus (the temperature at which the phase reaches melting point, over 200°C). As neither silver nor mercury is amphoteric (ie, reacts with both acids and bases), the chances of any chemical decomposition in the pH range of saliva are very remote, indeed, unless you drink large quantities of, say, hydrochloric acid, in which case any oxidation of the amalgam surface could conceivably minute quantities of mercurous chloride or calomel, which is less toxic than mercuric chloride.

Toxicology is not an exact science, because different animals and even individuals react differently to toxins. Toxicologists therefore always err on the safe side, usually by decreeing a safe dose as a factor of one-tenth of the lowest dose known to have any toxic effect (sometimes one-third, in the case of substances with a long known history of the toxicology and epidemiology).

It is also important to distinguish between acute, sub-chronic and chronic toxicity. Acute toxicity is the effect of a single exposure and is usually defined as LD50 (the lethal dose which will kill 50% of the subjects within 24 or 48 hours). This is obviously irrelevant to this discussion, as it implies very large doses. Chronic toxicity is the effect of extremely small doses over long periods of time, with cumulative toxins. The classic example is typified in the phrase, mad as a hatter. Hatters dressed beaver skins for top hats with mercury. As it has a vapour pressure at room temperature, they inhaled minute quantities of mercury vapour into the lungs for many years. Some of this reacted with the alveolar mucus and entered the blood stream and caused cumulative degeneration of parts of the brain. (To allay any arguments the mercury-silver intermetallic has zero vapour pressure at body temperature). Substances which cause cumulative degeneration of any tissue have a safe dosage based on (usually) the ponderal parts-per-million (ppm) or mg/m3 or µg/l, depending on the method of entry into the body.

To get to the point: there is quasi-zero risk of mercury poisoning from having amalgam fillings. There would be a risk of acute poisoning at the time of obturing the cavity, before the intermetallic phase is formed, but the quantities are too small for this risk to be serious and the metabolic disintegration of most of any ingested mercury would eliminate it in 24 hours through the faeces. Equally, there may be a minute acute risk if an existing filling is ground away, due to the high temperatures locally generated (for this reason, it is probably a mistake to remove existing fillings, certainly a plurality of them).

Modern fillings, based on UV-activated polymers are probably less toxic than mercury amalgams and are therefore preferable, but these have been developed only in the past couple of decades. There is therefore little reason for dentists to use mercury amalgams now, except in a few specific cases, where the synthetic fillings cannot hold mechanically.

The reason that mercury amalgam fillings are being actively discouraged or even banned now has nothing to do with patient safety. It is because the mixing process does release small amounts of mercury vapour which is cumulatively inhaled by the dentist and his staff: THEY are the ones at risk.

Like in many cases, a little learning is a dangerous thing and there are a minority of cranks who believe that the very word mercury means toxics, without any scientific knowledge whatsoever. These guys, often ecopoliticians, cause much economic harm by their rants, concerning many more substances than just mercury. Ignore them.

Devil dixit

PS Dentists have an enormous armoury of other toxic substances used in the practice of their art.
devil
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1536
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:33 pm

Postby michalis5354 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:20 pm

Devil I know this is a controversial issue that needs further examination and opinions differ on that matter.

Dentists have an enormous armoury of other toxic substances used in the practice of their art.


Like what? What kind of substances can they use?


The fact that I investigate this issue more and more is because since I visited my dentist last month I have faced different symptoms which are mostly matched to toxicity.
User avatar
michalis5354
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 10:48 am

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest