Simon wrote:Floda wrote:Simon wrote:Get Real! wrote:Simon wrote:Get Real! wrote:Baby Simon asks...
Why the US and others are training Iraqi forces to keep the peace?PS: Would anyone object and blame me if I were to slap the living daylights out of this ignorant fool called Simon?
Come and try it.
Rather than calling everything 'stupid' like a baby, which you constantly accuse me of being, put together a coherent argument, (if you are capable) and take it from there.
You stupid little Greek mythological fuck for a brain, if the US illegally invades and occupies a country and then installs its own puppet government does it then make sense to “train Iraqi forces to keep the peace” ???
Now get out of my sight you incompetent fool!
GR, the US wants a stable Iraqi government to listen to them and do as they say, they don't want Iraq in civil war, with troops and civilians dying everyday, and the rest of the world blaming them for the mess. What planet are you from?
Subsequent to the unlawful and murderous assault upon the innocent sleeping civilian population of Baghdad perpetrated by the Yanks on the occasion of their infamous 'Shock and Awe' night of terror (and the period since), one wonders just WHO you would blame for the mess you refer to ?.
The US and allies of course share a large part of the blame for the mess that followed in Iraq, I do not deny this. My point here, is that it is not in the interests of the West for this mess to continue, nor is it in the interests of the West to accept constant blame for it continuing.
Surely then, if the West CAN accept it's responsibility for those actions which have been condemned as 'Unlawful' and 'Murderous' by major powers and general populations throughout the civilised world, it makes little (or no) sense to be contemplating the escalation of conflict in the same and surrounding areas.
We, as members of the said civilised communities, would do well to recognize the evils that those in power perpetrate in order to impose their will upon other (less well militarily equipped) nations, such actions can only serve to heap shame upon us all and further alienate us from those who suffer such impositions.
Incidentally, as far as I am aware, no declaration of 'WAR' has been declared upon ANY of the regions in the fields of current conflict, therefore, (in my opinion) it is grossly unfair to refer to them as such, the term 'Battle' might be more appropriate in describing the struggles currently taking place since 'WAR' conjures up images of courage and I believe such descriptions are misplaced under the circumstances.
Actually, to step even further into the firing line, when a mighty and superior force imposes it's will upon a weaker one, I believe the term 'Cowardice' fits the pistol more appropriately.
I do wonder if we might agree on THAT small point.
IMHO.