The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Islamic crimes against humainty - another day in paradise.

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Postby Linichka » Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:15 am

"Hamas claims responsibility for Jewish settlers attack"

Moreover, the vermin are even celebrating the results of their savagery.
Linichka
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:45 pm

Postby Schnauzer » Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:34 am

Schnauzer wrote:
Lit wrote:
Schnauzer wrote:
Lit wrote:
Schnauzer wrote:"A natural response by the Palestinian resistance to the enemy's crimes" is how the OTHER side views the matter.

Perhaps the resistance considers those attacked as 'Unwelcome Trespassers' or even something more.


STFU. You see Greek Cypriots slaughtering Turkish settlers, asshole? The Turkish settlers need to be removed but i dont think the answer is to kill them all.


Schnauzer wrote:Not quite sure what the term 'STFU' means


Google is your friend.

Schnauzer wrote:I'm afraid, as to the rest of your contribution, the removal of the crudity contained in it leaves little to respond to.


Uhuh. Why are you avoiding my question? Do you see any GCs killing Turkish Settlers? Would it be wise for the RoC to apply the same extremist policies as Hamas? We have a problem with settlers ....should we also kill them?

Schnauzer wrote:I can only assume that you are quite unaware of the slaughter which has and is taking place in Palestine at the behest of the Israeli military commanders. :roll:


Oh, i am certainly aware of the Palestinian suffering but has the killing of a pregnant woman brought justice to the Palestinian cause?


Perhaps I would have been able to answer your question IF it was posed as one.

I see you have added the word 'DO' to your initial remarks (am I to assume that 'STFU' means the same ?.)

I think GR has now answered your question quite satisfactorily and I have little to add to it.

As to the death of the pregnant young Lady, perhaps such an awful occurrence might lend weight to public opinion and relieve some of the suffering inflicted upon the rightful owners of the territory which is (by encroachment) being stolen from them by the illegal 'Terror State of Israel'. (IMHO) :wink:


It is a poor show when one has to resort to chicanery in order to press a point (particularly one of little consequence) thus your clumsy dissection of my response to your ORIGINAL post, clearly illustrates your inability to engage in an intelligent exchange of views.

Attempted ridicule in response to ANY exchange is the hallmark of defeat, the use of vulgarity is the hallmark of ignorance, may I suggest that you avoid both ?.

As to the 'Smiley', closer examination will reveal that it is in fact a 'Wink' and should not be taken as a sign of approval, rather as an invitation to THINK about whatever the subject matter may be.

Your eagerness to 'Score Points' may have deprived you of the ability to accept that there may be fault on BOTH sides of a conflict, I would encourage a little more 'Open Mindedness' when dealing with the situation in Palestine. :wink:
User avatar
Schnauzer
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2155
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Touring Timbuktu.

Postby Schnauzer » Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:48 am

Linichka wrote:"Hamas claims responsibility for Jewish settlers attack"

Moreover, the vermin are even celebrating the results of their savagery.


How strange that you should choose the term 'Vermin' to describe the opponents of the 'Terror State of Israel', such a term should NOT be used descriptively of ANY human being, I would have thought that 'Hitler's' fondness of the word (when generally applied to the Jews) would have discouraged it's use other than in it's correct application.

Incidentally, do not the Israeli's gather in celebration when they achieve some slaughter, or are they too busy stealing MORE land from those who rightfully own it but are of lesser power to prevent it ?.

Ultimately, one act of slaughter is equivalent to the other. (IMHO) :wink:
User avatar
Schnauzer
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2155
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Touring Timbuktu.

Postby Lit » Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:15 am

Schnauzer wrote:
Schnauzer wrote:
Lit wrote:
Schnauzer wrote:
Lit wrote:
Schnauzer wrote:"A natural response by the Palestinian resistance to the enemy's crimes" is how the OTHER side views the matter.

Perhaps the resistance considers those attacked as 'Unwelcome Trespassers' or even something more.


STFU. You see Greek Cypriots slaughtering Turkish settlers, asshole? The Turkish settlers need to be removed but i dont think the answer is to kill them all.


Schnauzer wrote:Not quite sure what the term 'STFU' means


Google is your friend.

Schnauzer wrote:I'm afraid, as to the rest of your contribution, the removal of the crudity contained in it leaves little to respond to.


Uhuh. Why are you avoiding my question? Do you see any GCs killing Turkish Settlers? Would it be wise for the RoC to apply the same extremist policies as Hamas? We have a problem with settlers ....should we also kill them?

Schnauzer wrote:I can only assume that you are quite unaware of the slaughter which has and is taking place in Palestine at the behest of the Israeli military commanders. :roll:


Oh, i am certainly aware of the Palestinian suffering but has the killing of a pregnant woman brought justice to the Palestinian cause?


Perhaps I would have been able to answer your question IF it was posed as one.

I see you have added the word 'DO' to your initial remarks (am I to assume that 'STFU' means the same ?.)

I think GR has now answered your question quite satisfactorily and I have little to add to it.

As to the death of the pregnant young Lady, perhaps such an awful occurrence might lend weight to public opinion and relieve some of the suffering inflicted upon the rightful owners of the territory which is (by encroachment) being stolen from them by the illegal 'Terror State of Israel'. (IMHO) :wink:


It is a poor show when one has to resort to chicanery in order to press a point (particularly one of little consequence) thus your clumsy dissection of my response to your ORIGINAL post, clearly illustrates your inability to engage in an intelligent exchange of views.

Attempted ridicule in response to ANY exchange is the hallmark of defeat, the use of vulgarity is the hallmark of ignorance, may I suggest that you avoid both ?.

As to the 'Smiley', closer examination will reveal that it is in fact a 'Wink' and should not be taken as a sign of approval, rather as an invitation to THINK about whatever the subject matter may be.

Your eagerness to 'Score Points' may have deprived you of the ability to accept that there may be fault on BOTH sides of a conflict, I would encourage a little more 'Open Mindedness' when dealing with the situation in Palestine. :wink:


Schnauzer, the crudity and arrogance is all in your comment! I must say you are displaying the mark of an uncivilized village twat. You, here forth known as "Shnozz", have no place in what is called the Western Culture until and unless you learn how to deal with prrrrrovocation! SIR, murder is murder is murder is murder.

One more thing to add. I got you all rrrrooooused up and that means my work is done!

Now you know how i feel when i read your drrrrrivel!

:wink:<~~~~ look, its a winking smiley! Good day, Shnozz!
Lit
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:32 am
Location: Right behind ya

Postby Lit » Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:24 am

Linichka wrote:"Hamas claims responsibility for Jewish settlers attack"

Moreover, the vermin are even celebrating the results of their savagery.


A pregnant woman is killed...time to start waving the Islamic flags in the streets and pass sweets to the children! U-lululululululululululululu
Lit
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:32 am
Location: Right behind ya

Postby Schnauzer » Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:40 am

Lit wrote:
Schnauzer wrote:
Schnauzer wrote:
Lit wrote:
Schnauzer wrote:
Lit wrote:
Schnauzer wrote:"A natural response by the Palestinian resistance to the enemy's crimes" is how the OTHER side views the matter.

Perhaps the resistance considers those attacked as 'Unwelcome Trespassers' or even something more.


STFU. You see Greek Cypriots slaughtering Turkish settlers, asshole? The Turkish settlers need to be removed but i dont think the answer is to kill them all.


Schnauzer wrote:Not quite sure what the term 'STFU' means


Google is your friend.

Schnauzer wrote:I'm afraid, as to the rest of your contribution, the removal of the crudity contained in it leaves little to respond to.


Uhuh. Why are you avoiding my question? Do you see any GCs killing Turkish Settlers? Would it be wise for the RoC to apply the same extremist policies as Hamas? We have a problem with settlers ....should we also kill them?

Schnauzer wrote:I can only assume that you are quite unaware of the slaughter which has and is taking place in Palestine at the behest of the Israeli military commanders. :roll:


Oh, i am certainly aware of the Palestinian suffering but has the killing of a pregnant woman brought justice to the Palestinian cause?


Perhaps I would have been able to answer your question IF it was posed as one.

I see you have added the word 'DO' to your initial remarks (am I to assume that 'STFU' means the same ?.)

I think GR has now answered your question quite satisfactorily and I have little to add to it.

As to the death of the pregnant young Lady, perhaps such an awful occurrence might lend weight to public opinion and relieve some of the suffering inflicted upon the rightful owners of the territory which is (by encroachment) being stolen from them by the illegal 'Terror State of Israel'. (IMHO) :wink:


It is a poor show when one has to resort to chicanery in order to press a point (particularly one of little consequence) thus your clumsy dissection of my response to your ORIGINAL post, clearly illustrates your inability to engage in an intelligent exchange of views.

Attempted ridicule in response to ANY exchange is the hallmark of defeat, the use of vulgarity is the hallmark of ignorance, may I suggest that you avoid both ?.

As to the 'Smiley', closer examination will reveal that it is in fact a 'Wink' and should not be taken as a sign of approval, rather as an invitation to THINK about whatever the subject matter may be.

Your eagerness to 'Score Points' may have deprived you of the ability to accept that there may be fault on BOTH sides of a conflict, I would encourage a little more 'Open Mindedness' when dealing with the situation in Palestine. :wink:


Schnauzer, the crudity and arrogance is all in your comment! I must say you are displaying the mark of an uncivilized village twat. You, here forth known as "Shnozz", have no place in what is called the Western Culture until and unless you learn how to deal with prrrrrovocation! SIR, murder is murder is murder is murder.

One more thing to add. I got you all rrrrooooused up and that means my work is done!

Now you know how i feel when i read your drrrrrivel!

:wink:<~~~~ look, its a winking smiley! Good day, Shnozz!


Actually, as any person with a modicum of intelligence will recognize, your comments are a clear indication of DEFEAT and I (as a gentleman) graciously accept your obvious resignation from this minor affray, although I must confess a certain amount of surprise at the alacrity you display in so doing.

In order to exhibit some magnanimity on my part, may I compliment you on the fact that you managed to resign your position WITHOUT resorting to abusive language ?. :lol: :lol: :wink:
User avatar
Schnauzer
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2155
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Touring Timbuktu.

Postby Schnauzer » Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:44 pm

Lit wrote: SIR, murder is murder is murder is murder.


Upon making a speech relative to the 'Hunger Strikers' (during the IRA struggles against British oppression) Margaret Thatcher PM uttered the immortal phrase "A crime is a crime is a crime!"

The actual origin of this phrase is held to be from the Poem by Gertrude Stein 'Sacred Emily' in which she states, "Rose is a Rose is a Rose is a Rose"

There have been many other distortions of Gertrude Stein's words, particularly where an emphasis is required by an 'Orator' but I must confess that I have seldom seen it written.

The use of such is commonly known as 'The rhetoric law of thricefold repetition' and what interests me about YOUR application is the fact that you have quadrupled a word in order to gain emphasis.

I do wonder if your intention is to create a rhetoric law of 'Fourfold repetition' ?, OR (more likely) that you suffered a fleeting attack of 'Margaret Thatcheritis'.

If the latter of the two is correct, a glass of whisky may cure you of the malady, if the former, you will need to be in touch with the relative Dept of Law which deals with the recognition of new uses for the English Language.

Good Luck either way but, as a matter of further interest, Sir Winston Churchill (ex PM) was a notorious 'Toper' and was also quite renowned for his 'Oratory' contributions to his public, in HIS case, the excess of drink did NOT produce the 'TRUTH' so many folk insist it does. :wink:
User avatar
Schnauzer
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2155
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Touring Timbuktu.

Postby Get Real! » Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:11 pm

Lit wrote:Hamas claims responsibility:

If I were to post links to articles of Israelis killing Palestinians, I’d be doing nothing else all day!
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Me Ed » Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:58 am

Get Real! wrote:
Lit wrote:Hamas claims responsibility:

If I were to post links to articles of Israelis killing Palestinians, I’d be doing nothing else all day!

Stick to your alleged "Israel is commiting war crimes" thread.

As for you pretending that you don't spend all day doing nothing else than spend your time on CF, pull the other one!
User avatar
Me Ed
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:24 pm
Location: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Postby Lit » Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:44 am

Pakistan Shiites mourn those killed in triple bomb

By BABAR DOGAR (AP) – 12 hours ago

LAHORE, Pakistan — Thousands of Shiite Muslims, thumping their chests and crying, mourned Thursday at funeral prayers for victims of a triple bombing that heaped more tragedy on Pakistan, which is already struggling to cope with devastating floods.

The blasts that targeted a Shiite ceremony late Wednesday in this eastern city were the first major attacks since flood waters tore through the country over the past month, destroying or damaging more than one million homes and prompting a major international relief effort that continues to struggle with the scale of the destruction.

The Pakistan Taliban claimed responsibility for the attacks in a phone call to an Associated Press reporter.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... AD9HVS69G1
Lit
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:32 am
Location: Right behind ya

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests