The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Islamic crimes against humainty - another day in paradise.

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Postby Milo » Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:51 am

Simon, good post indeed.

Floda is yet another worrying member of society whose twisted mindset causes problems for majorities anywhere.

Floda knows nothing about Muslims, only about extremists. Which makes me glad that very very few agree with him.

What an a***e :roll:
User avatar
Milo
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 529
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 8:38 am

Postby Floda » Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:56 am

Milo wrote:Simon, good post indeed.

Floda is yet another worrying member of society whose twisted mindset causes problems for majorities anywhere.

Floda knows nothing about Muslims, only about extremists. Which makes me glad that very very few agree with him.

What an a***e :roll:


For a man who cannot even spell 'Arse' (albeit that you chose to disguise it) you certainly qualify for a position in the ranks of those who are prepared to be led by the nose. :lol: :lol: :roll:

Not I my friend, I like to consider the reasons for such disharmony as we are currently witnessing in our troubled world.

I can see much evidence of the political and military ambitions of the Western powers and the lengths they are prepared to go in the pursuit of them.

I can understand the 'Twisted Mindset' (as you describe it) of those who are opposed to standing mute whilst their lands and countries are stolen by foreign forces which seek to subjugate the indigenous populations.

Perhaps YOU can find justification in the murderous slaughter of innocent civilians who were (and still are being) wiped out by the mighty West (and it's Eastern allies).

Fortunately, I cannot. :wink:
User avatar
Floda
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Wherever TRUTH prevails

Postby Oracle » Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:11 am

Floda wrote:Strange how it seems to be so obvious to me. :wink:


Welcome back, Floda.

It seems the West has not moved on from its Missionary position ....
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Floda » Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:19 am

Oracle wrote:
Floda wrote:Strange how it seems to be so obvious to me. :wink:


Welcome back, Floda.

It seems the West has not moved on from its Missionary position ....


I think it may well be a case of a certain amazement that the 'Fuzzy Wuzzies' have risen once again :lol: :lol: :wink:
User avatar
Floda
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: Wherever TRUTH prevails

Postby Get Real! » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:16 pm

Simon wrote:Firstly, many suicide bombers are/were not blowing themselves up to resist the occupation (or 'oppression'), especially in Iraq. Even the vast majority of the British troops that are dying in Helmand for instance are killed by IEDs. Most of these suicide bombers (especially in Iraq) were actually blowing themselves up in markets filled with women and children, areas packed with civilians, even mosques, in revenge attacks on certain religious communities or rival tribes. It is a type of power struggle with the intention of destabilising the country.

:idea: And who would benefit more from destabilizing these countries?

THE OCCUPIER OF COURSE!

And not to mention that “suicide bombings” were totally unheard of prior to these countries’ invasion & occupation by the US/UK!

You’re finally waking up to reality Simon! :wink:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Oracle » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:20 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Simon wrote:Firstly, many suicide bombers are/were not blowing themselves up to resist the occupation (or 'oppression'), especially in Iraq. Even the vast majority of the British troops that are dying in Helmand for instance are killed by IEDs. Most of these suicide bombers (especially in Iraq) were actually blowing themselves up in markets filled with women and children, areas packed with civilians, even mosques, in revenge attacks on certain religious communities or rival tribes. It is a type of power struggle with the intention of destabilising the country.

:idea: And who would benefit more from destabilizing these countries?

THE OCCUPIER OF COURSE!

And not to mention that “suicide bombings” were totally unheard of prior to these countries’ invasion & occupation by the US/UK!

You’re finally waking up to reality Simon! :wink:


So are these suicide bombers in fact paid mercenaries of the West?
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Get Real! » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:41 pm

Oracle wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Simon wrote:Firstly, many suicide bombers are/were not blowing themselves up to resist the occupation (or 'oppression'), especially in Iraq. Even the vast majority of the British troops that are dying in Helmand for instance are killed by IEDs. Most of these suicide bombers (especially in Iraq) were actually blowing themselves up in markets filled with women and children, areas packed with civilians, even mosques, in revenge attacks on certain religious communities or rival tribes. It is a type of power struggle with the intention of destabilising the country.

:idea: And who would benefit more from destabilizing these countries?

THE OCCUPIER OF COURSE!

And not to mention that “suicide bombings” were totally unheard of prior to these countries’ invasion & occupation by the US/UK!

You’re finally waking up to reality Simon! :wink:


So are these suicide bombers in fact paid mercenaries of the West?

A mercenary is a professional soldier for hire but these individuals are just paid thugs for hire who instead of heading to the front to fight off the invader, opt for easy financial benefit by committing treasonous and cowardly acts against anyone they’re asked.

These individuals thrive under a state of chaos created by the invader because it creates “opportunities” for them! Every country has them but no one knows better how to exploit them than the US/UK! :wink:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Oracle » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:51 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Oracle wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Simon wrote:Firstly, many suicide bombers are/were not blowing themselves up to resist the occupation (or 'oppression'), especially in Iraq. Even the vast majority of the British troops that are dying in Helmand for instance are killed by IEDs. Most of these suicide bombers (especially in Iraq) were actually blowing themselves up in markets filled with women and children, areas packed with civilians, even mosques, in revenge attacks on certain religious communities or rival tribes. It is a type of power struggle with the intention of destabilising the country.

:idea: And who would benefit more from destabilizing these countries?

THE OCCUPIER OF COURSE!

And not to mention that “suicide bombings” were totally unheard of prior to these countries’ invasion & occupation by the US/UK!

You’re finally waking up to reality Simon! :wink:


So are these suicide bombers in fact paid mercenaries of the West?

A mercenary is a professional soldier for hire but these individuals are just paid thugs for hire who instead of heading to the front to fight off the invader, opt for easy financial benefit by committing treasonous and cowardly acts against anyone they’re asked.

These individuals thrive under a state of chaos created by the invader because it creates “opportunities” for them! Every country has them but no one knows better how to exploit them than the US/UK! :wink:


I should have put 'mercenaries'. But, you've spelt it out how people/thugs are psychologically exploited by politicians, to fight their wars.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Svetlana » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:06 pm

I think the first known suicide bomber attack was that of the assassination of Czar Alexandra II in Saint Petersburg in 1881.
User avatar
Svetlana
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3094
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Paphos

Postby Get Real! » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:16 pm

Svetlana wrote:I think the first known suicide bomber attack was that of the assassination of Czar Alexandra II in Saint Petersburg in 1881.

You may recall this thread… :)

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/cyprus17931.html
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests