Floda is yet another worrying member of society whose twisted mindset causes problems for majorities anywhere.
Floda knows nothing about Muslims, only about extremists. Which makes me glad that very very few agree with him.
What an a***e
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b126f/b126f3b4a8329a34f7938d8c263f6da5367c663d" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Milo wrote:Simon, good post indeed.
Floda is yet another worrying member of society whose twisted mindset causes problems for majorities anywhere.
Floda knows nothing about Muslims, only about extremists. Which makes me glad that very very few agree with him.
What an a***e
Oracle wrote:Floda wrote:Strange how it seems to be so obvious to me.
Welcome back, Floda.
It seems the West has not moved on from its Missionary position ....
Simon wrote:Firstly, many suicide bombers are/were not blowing themselves up to resist the occupation (or 'oppression'), especially in Iraq. Even the vast majority of the British troops that are dying in Helmand for instance are killed by IEDs. Most of these suicide bombers (especially in Iraq) were actually blowing themselves up in markets filled with women and children, areas packed with civilians, even mosques, in revenge attacks on certain religious communities or rival tribes. It is a type of power struggle with the intention of destabilising the country.
Get Real! wrote:Simon wrote:Firstly, many suicide bombers are/were not blowing themselves up to resist the occupation (or 'oppression'), especially in Iraq. Even the vast majority of the British troops that are dying in Helmand for instance are killed by IEDs. Most of these suicide bombers (especially in Iraq) were actually blowing themselves up in markets filled with women and children, areas packed with civilians, even mosques, in revenge attacks on certain religious communities or rival tribes. It is a type of power struggle with the intention of destabilising the country.
And who would benefit more from destabilizing these countries?
THE OCCUPIER OF COURSE!
And not to mention that “suicide bombings” were totally unheard of prior to these countries’ invasion & occupation by the US/UK!
You’re finally waking up to reality Simon!
Oracle wrote:Get Real! wrote:Simon wrote:Firstly, many suicide bombers are/were not blowing themselves up to resist the occupation (or 'oppression'), especially in Iraq. Even the vast majority of the British troops that are dying in Helmand for instance are killed by IEDs. Most of these suicide bombers (especially in Iraq) were actually blowing themselves up in markets filled with women and children, areas packed with civilians, even mosques, in revenge attacks on certain religious communities or rival tribes. It is a type of power struggle with the intention of destabilising the country.
And who would benefit more from destabilizing these countries?
THE OCCUPIER OF COURSE!
And not to mention that “suicide bombings” were totally unheard of prior to these countries’ invasion & occupation by the US/UK!
You’re finally waking up to reality Simon!
So are these suicide bombers in fact paid mercenaries of the West?
Get Real! wrote:Oracle wrote:Get Real! wrote:Simon wrote:Firstly, many suicide bombers are/were not blowing themselves up to resist the occupation (or 'oppression'), especially in Iraq. Even the vast majority of the British troops that are dying in Helmand for instance are killed by IEDs. Most of these suicide bombers (especially in Iraq) were actually blowing themselves up in markets filled with women and children, areas packed with civilians, even mosques, in revenge attacks on certain religious communities or rival tribes. It is a type of power struggle with the intention of destabilising the country.
And who would benefit more from destabilizing these countries?
THE OCCUPIER OF COURSE!
And not to mention that “suicide bombings” were totally unheard of prior to these countries’ invasion & occupation by the US/UK!
You’re finally waking up to reality Simon!
So are these suicide bombers in fact paid mercenaries of the West?
A mercenary is a professional soldier for hire but these individuals are just paid thugs for hire who instead of heading to the front to fight off the invader, opt for easy financial benefit by committing treasonous and cowardly acts against anyone they’re asked.
These individuals thrive under a state of chaos created by the invader because it creates “opportunities” for them! Every country has them but no one knows better how to exploit them than the US/UK!
Svetlana wrote:I think the first known suicide bomber attack was that of the assassination of Czar Alexandra II in Saint Petersburg in 1881.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests