Cyprus-Forum.com

[Floda]

Actually, to step even further into the firing line, when a mighty and superior force imposes it's will upon a weaker one, I believe the term 'Cowardice' fits the pistol more appropriately.

I do wonder if we might agree on THAT small point.

IMHO.

Subsequent to the recent announcement that a further 30,000 troops (courtesy of the mighty US) plus a few thousand more from various other 'Arse Licking Nations' which will achieve a force of around 300,000 troops arrayed against an opposing force of about 25,000.

I do wonder if the term 'Hero' should be more readily imposed on the fallen of the SMALLER force ?, after all, THEY are only resisting the aggression and oppression of nations that wish to rob them of their own identities, perhaps replacing their 'Culture' with one that (to those who resist) regard as inferior to their own.

Wootton Bassett is on standby, the Yanks have set up 'Hot Dog' stands along the route for those who stand and weep in the rain.

[Get Real!]

Little War Criminals Get Punished, Big Ones Don’t

I have no sympathy for people who make others suffer. Nevertheless, I wonder at the International Criminal Court’s pick from the assortment of war criminals? Why al-Bashir?

Is it because Sudan is a powerless state, and the International Criminal Court hasn’t the courage to name George W. Bush and Tony Blair as war criminals?

Bush and Blair’s crimes against humanity in Iraq and Afghanistan dwarf, at least in the number of deaths and displaced persons, the terrible situation in Darfur. The highest estimate of Darfur casualties is 400,000, one-third the number of Iraqis who have died as a result of Bush’s invasion. Moreover, the conflict in the Sudan is an internal one, whereas Bush illegally invaded two foreign countries, war crimes under the Nuremberg Standard. Bush’s war crimes were enabled by the political leaders of the UK, Spain, Canada, and Australia. The leaders of every member of the “coalition of the willing to commit war crimes” are candidates for the dock.

But of course the Great Moral West does not commit war crimes. War crimes are charges fobbed off on people demonized by the Western media, such as the Serbian Milosovic and the Sudanese al-Bashir.

Every week the Israeli government evicts Palestinians from their homes, steals their land, and kills Palestinian women and children. These crimes against humanity have been going on for decades. Except for a few Israeli human rights organizations, no one complains about it. Palestinians are defined as “terrorists,” and “terrorists” can be treated inhumanely without complaint.

Iraqis and Afghans suffer the same fate. Iraqis who resist US occupation of their country are “terrorists.” Taliban is a demonized name. Every Afghan killed--even those attending wedding parties--is claimed to be Taliban by the US military. Iraqis and Afghans can be murdered at will by American and NATO troops without anyone raising human rights issues.

The International Criminal Court is a bureaucracy. It has a budget, and it needs to do something to justify its budget. Lacking teeth and courage, it goes after the petty war criminals and leaves the big ones alone.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e20294.htm

[SKI-preo]

When Taliban blow themselves up they are told they will have 72 virgins in heaven. What about the persepective of those 72 virgins? They stayed virgins died and went to heaven then they are forced to have to have sex with these hairy bearded terrorists for all eternity. How is that paradise for the virgins?

[miltiades]

Actually, to step even further into the firing line, when a mighty and superior force imposes it's will upon a weaker one, I believe the term 'Cowardice' fits the pistol more appropriately.

I do wonder if we might agree on THAT small point.

IMHO.

Subsequent to the recent announcement that a further 30,000 troops (courtesy of the mighty US) plus a few thousand more from various other 'Arse Licking Nations' which will achieve a force of around 300,000 troops arrayed against an opposing force of about 25,000.

I do wonder if the term 'Hero' should be more readily imposed on the fallen of the SMALLER force ?, after all, THEY are only resisting the aggression and oppression of nations that wish to rob them of their own identities, perhaps replacing their 'Culture' with one that (to those who resist) regard as inferior to their own.

Wootton Bassett is on standby, the Yanks have set up 'Hot Dog' stands along the route for those who stand and weep in the rain.

You are so bloody consistent and so bloody full of crap too!!

[Me Ed]

Mosque attacked in Pakistani city of Rawalpindi

At least 10 people have been killed in an attack at a mosque in the garrison city of Rawalpindi, Pakistani military officials say

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8394694.stm

[Floda]

Actually, to step even further into the firing line, when a mighty and superior force imposes it's will upon a weaker one, I believe the term 'Cowardice' fits the pistol more appropriately.

I do wonder if we might agree on THAT small point.

IMHO.

Subsequent to the recent announcement that a further 30,000 troops (courtesy of the mighty US) plus a few thousand more from various other 'Arse Licking Nations' which will achieve a force of around 300,000 troops arrayed against an opposing force of about 25,000.

I do wonder if the term 'Hero' should be more readily imposed on the fallen of the SMALLER force ?, after all, THEY are only resisting the aggression and oppression of nations that wish to rob them of their own identities, perhaps replacing their 'Culture' with one that (to those who resist) regard as inferior to their own.

Wootton Bassett is on standby, the Yanks have set up 'Hot Dog' stands along the route for those who stand and weep in the rain.

You are so bloody consistent and so bloody full of crap too!!

Consistency can be a virtue when applied to the resistance of 'EVIL' or in the thought processes required in determining the sources of such 'EVIL'.

Unfortunately, a person such as yourself has not the capability of recognising that which is concealed behind ANY action your personal 'Mentors' (US, UK and Israel) may take in the enforcement of their particular policies.

Thus, the ONLY consistency YOU are capable of (as a traitor to your own country) is to offer insult and abuse to any who may contest your own pusillanimous opinions.

In my opinion (and I welcome contradiction) the FORMER consistent attitude is far superior to the LATTER.

Unless of course one wishes to be led by the nose by the original enemies of one's own homeland which, again unfortunately, would appear to be a true representation of YOUR attitude. (IMHO) of course.

[Me Ed]

Car bombs cause carnage in the capital of Iraq

A series of car bombings have killed at least 101 people and wounded 182 in the centre of the Iraqi capital, Baghdad.

The first blast targeted a police patrol in the Dora district of the city. Four others occurred near official buildings within minutes.

In October, co-ordinated bombs attacks killed at least 155 people and wounded hundreds in Baghdad.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8400865.stm

[Floda]

Car bombs cause carnage in the capital of Iraq

A series of car bombings have killed at least 101 people and wounded 182 in the centre of the Iraqi capital, Baghdad.

The first blast targeted a police patrol in the Dora district of the city. Four others occurred near official buildings within minutes.

In October, co-ordinated bombs attacks killed at least 155 people and wounded hundreds in Baghdad.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8400865.stm

Subsequent to the above bomb attacks, the US ambassador to Iraq Christopher Hill and General Raymond Odierno (America's top commander in Iraq) issued a joint statement pledging assistance to the Iraqi government (such as it is) in bringing those groups or individuals responsible for 'Murder' to justice.

One wonders IF the same commitment in the pursuit of justice will be applied to the task of placing George Bush and Tony Blair in the dock.

After all, since it is now generally known that the unlawful and murderous attack on Iraq was based on fabricated and concocted evidence of WMD (Blair having acted on the information of a 'Taxi Driver's' assumption that Iraq could attack Cyprus at 45 minutes notice), is it not a fact that BOTH of these individuals, quite apart from the slaughter of SO many innocents, actually brought about the hanging of an 'Innocent' man ? (I refer to Sadam Hussein ) who, despite whatever WE of the West may think of HIM, has in fact been proven to be innocent of the crime he was hanged for.

Strangely enough, I (as with millions of others world wide) was under the impression that the US had control of Baghdad, it would appear that the insurgents are finally getting their priorities right in attacking the government departments which feign to be acting in the interests of the people. (IMHO) as ever .

[Free Spirit]

They've to stop the promise to prospective suicide bombers of 72 virgins since 'Susan Boyle' became famous; most of them left the training camp after watching X factor.

[Free Spirit]

Car bombs cause carnage in the capital of Iraq

A series of car bombings have killed at least 101 people and wounded 182 in the centre of the Iraqi capital, Baghdad.

The first blast targeted a police patrol in the Dora district of the city. Four others occurred near official buildings within minutes.

In October, co-ordinated bombs attacks killed at least 155 people and wounded hundreds in Baghdad.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8400865.stm

Subsequent to the above bomb attacks, the US ambassador to Iraq Christopher Hill and General Raymond Odierno (America's top commander in Iraq) issued a joint statement pledging assistance to the Iraqi government (such as it is) in bringing those groups or individuals responsible for 'Murder' to justice.

One wonders IF the same commitment in the pursuit of justice will be applied to the task of placing George Bush and Tony Blair in the dock.

After all, since it is now generally known that the unlawful and murderous attack on Iraq was based on fabricated and concocted evidence of WMD (Blair having acted on the information of a 'Taxi Driver's' assumption that Iraq could attack Cyprus at 45 minutes notice), is it not a fact that BOTH of these individuals, quite apart from the slaughter of SO many innocents, actually brought about the hanging of an 'Innocent' man ? (I refer to Sadam Hussein ) who, despite whatever WE of the West may think of HIM, has in fact been proven to be innocent of the crime he was hanged for.

Strangely enough, I (as with millions of others world wide) was under the impression that the US had control of Baghdad, it would appear that the insurgents are finally getting their priorities right in attacking the government departments which feign to be acting in the interests of the people. (IMHO) as ever .

And this is the excuse for muslims blowing each other up? What strange logic.
Obviously a student of the 'Get Real Brain Dead Flat Earth Society'