YFred wrote:Regarding fair access, I mean outnumbering the solutionists 4 to 1 on any debate and the Chair who should not be biased laughing at a comment a solutionist makes ridiculing him or making people walk off a debate through unfair treatment.
On the contrary the ones who are more are the solutionists and only 1 in 4 is a partitionist. This is a fair distribution since the partitionists (those who voted for the Annan partition plan) only represent 1/4th of the population, while the remaining 76% wants a solution and not a dissolution.
Regarding the Alcohol problem in USA, are you suggesting that prohibition if applied now would be better?
Regarding Heroin, why not legalise it and control its strength. Criminalising it does not stop people from using it, encourages people to steal to be able to buy it. It is the main driver of criminal activity. In my opinion cigarettes, alcohol, cannabis and heroine are no different. Banning them simply drives them underground. It takes balls to actually do what is necessary and good for all the population.
What I am saying YFred is that legalizing something does not solve the problem. Legalizing alcohol does not solve the problem of alcohol abuse. Similarly, legalizing the illegalities in Cyprus will not solve the problems that those illegalities create.
And while legalizing alcohol consumption at least has the benefit of transferring the control of alcohol distribution from the criminals to the government, in the Cyprus Problem case we would not even get that with the kind of "solution" that you want. The control of north Cyprus will remain to the criminals, and the criminals will now even have a say to what happens to Cyprus as a whole.
So in the Cyprus problem case by legalizing the illegalities not only we do not gain any control, we actually lose control. Therefore the only benefit of legalizing alcohol distribution does not apply to the case of the Cyprus Problem.