Bananiot wrote:Mikkie, you cannot talk sense to arteriosclerotics. Interesting to watch "to sizitame" tonight at RIK.
Bana, when have you ever talked sense? I mean really, wtf?
-mikkie2- wrote:Well, whichever way you take it, the net result is the same.
I would like you guys to explain to me how Turkey being blocked from the EU will make her beg to join? How badly does Turkey need the EU? The answer is not a great deal. She already has the customs union so trade is not really an issue, energy supplies are still going to come via Turkey. If anything Turkey and Russia could hold the EU to ransom in the future, particualry now that Russian and Turkish economic ties are strengthening.
Of course the mere fact that northern Cyrpus will continue to be flooded by settlers and continue to have an offensive army in no way safeguards our 67% of the island. In fact it puts what is left at risk. And if you think the French or the Germans or for that matter the Greeks will come rushing to our aid should hostilities break out then I suggest you think again. Perhaps the NG is much better trained with better weapons than it was in 1974 but its probably the same for the Turks.
So basically, a Turkey that is firmly anchored to the EU is what is required if we are to have any hope. Pushing Turkey away will destabilse things even more and if you think under these circumstances the balance of power would shift in our favour then I beg to differ.
One doesn't need to capitulate in order to get something that is favourable. It seems to me that the 'patriots' equate negotiating for a solution to capitulation. Well, that is not the case if we have skilfull politicians that can do what is right. In fact, I can well understand the stance of the 'patriots' because in the absence of any skilled politicians in Cyprus that can analyse, understand and manipulate the geopolitical scene in the region the only protection they have is to try to let things stay as they are!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest