The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Who the hell authorised Christofias?..

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby denizaksulu » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:46 am

Lit wrote:
Oracle wrote:dp


Uh ohh, Deniz, don't do it. Even if Oracle is wrong, you can not win this. ;-)

Back away slowly and go back to playing with GR!. Quickly, tell him what a good little Cherickidian he is! Yeah, maybe GR will start another anti-Hellenic thread for you if you do....

Its the little things in life that bring real joy, right Deniz? :lol:



She is persistent, I'll give her that. I love to see her.............squirm. :lol: Without loosing her rag. :wink:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby Kifeas » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:54 am

Tony-4497 wrote:
Nikitas wrote:"Has he even stopped to think what it would mean to have for 2 years in every term a Cyprus President that is fully controlled by Turkey??"

That is the purpose of the cross communal voting, to stop either motherland from having undue political influence in the choice of the two leaders.


If you believe that the TC President will not be FULLY controlled by Turkey, then you do not understand much about the composition of the "TC" population post-solution (i.e. settlers will be a majority) or the role that the TC community has played in Cyprus throughout its (short) history on the island - or Turkey's history for that matter.

Your views on this are clearly shared by Christofias, which is the worrying part.


It is in our capacity, during negotiations, not to accept the settlers -or at least the vast majority of them, to stay and obtain citizenship. This, with the fact that at least 20% of the electorate for the election of the TC VP will originate from the GC community, should provide the necessary safeguards to avoid what you suggest, although personally I have my doubts. Christofias initial proposal to elect the two presidents on a common ticket, like in the US, was a much better proposal from which he should not have backed down.
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby -mikkie2- » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:13 am

I think that Christophias should have stood his ground on the common ticket for president as it would force Tc and Gc parties to form common manifestos and enhance cooperation between communities. I think he is gambling on getting concessions on land so we have to see how that goes. In my mind, the Tc's will have to make significant concessions here.
-mikkie2-
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1298
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 12:11 am

Postby Oracle » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:59 am

These are all proposals and Christofias has already categorically stated that all the proposals will be nullified if the fundamental conditions for a settlement are not met. He can afford to be as "generous" as he likes with these proposals because Turkey will never accept the most basic condition which is removal of its "guarantorship" (already violated) after its withdrawal of Turkish troops and settlers ... These little "gifts" mean nothing to Turkey if it cannot have full control of Cyprus as a military base, either through occupation or guarantorship, (effectively) governmentship ...
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby YFred » Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:04 am

denizaksulu wrote:
Lit wrote:
Oracle wrote:dp


Uh ohh, Deniz, don't do it. Even if Oracle is wrong, you can not win this. ;-)

Back away slowly and go back to playing with GR!. Quickly, tell him what a good little Cherickidian he is! Yeah, maybe GR will start another anti-Hellenic thread for you if you do....

Its the little things in life that bring real joy, right Deniz? :lol:



She is persistent, I'll give her that. I love to see her.............squirm. :lol: Without loosing her rag. :wink:

What on earth do you mean Deniz? I didn't know O has taken to wearing rags I thought she was a rich bitch.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby zan » Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:12 am

Oracle wrote:These are all proposals and Christofias has already categorically stated that all the proposals will be nullified if the fundamental conditions for a settlement are not met. He can afford to be as "generous" as he likes with these proposals because Turkey will never accept the most basic condition which is removal of its "guarantorship" (already violated) after its withdrawal of Turkish troops and settlers ... These little "gifts" mean nothing to Turkey if it cannot have full control of Cyprus as a military base, either through occupation or guarantorship, (effectively) governmentship ...


You ignore the basic rule of : It is better to give than to receive: Agent O...Obviously you do not subscribe to that human condition!! :roll: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:42 am

Oracle wrote:These are all proposals and Christofias has already categorically stated that all the proposals will be nullified if the fundamental conditions for a settlement are not met. He can afford to be as "generous" as he likes with these proposals because Turkey will never accept the most basic condition which is removal of its "guarantorship" (already violated) after its withdrawal of Turkish troops and settlers ... These little "gifts" mean nothing to Turkey if it cannot have full control of Cyprus as a military base, either through occupation or guarantorship, (effectively) governmentship ...



Basically, what you are saying is that these talks are a waste of time (as it stands). Damn it; we are in agreement again. :evil:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby YFred » Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:44 am

denizaksulu wrote:
Oracle wrote:These are all proposals and Christofias has already categorically stated that all the proposals will be nullified if the fundamental conditions for a settlement are not met. He can afford to be as "generous" as he likes with these proposals because Turkey will never accept the most basic condition which is removal of its "guarantorship" (already violated) after its withdrawal of Turkish troops and settlers ... These little "gifts" mean nothing to Turkey if it cannot have full control of Cyprus as a military base, either through occupation or guarantorship, (effectively) governmentship ...



Basically, what you are saying is that these talks are a waste of time (as it stands). Damn it; we are in agreement again. :evil:

Deniz, give them a chance. Let us see how our nationalists feel about Muhtar X by December.
:wink:
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Piratis » Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:59 am

Kifeas wrote:
Tony-4497 wrote:
Nikitas wrote:"Has he even stopped to think what it would mean to have for 2 years in every term a Cyprus President that is fully controlled by Turkey??"

That is the purpose of the cross communal voting, to stop either motherland from having undue political influence in the choice of the two leaders.


If you believe that the TC President will not be FULLY controlled by Turkey, then you do not understand much about the composition of the "TC" population post-solution (i.e. settlers will be a majority) or the role that the TC community has played in Cyprus throughout its (short) history on the island - or Turkey's history for that matter.

Your views on this are clearly shared by Christofias, which is the worrying part.


It is in our capacity, during negotiations, not to accept the settlers -or at least the vast majority of them, to stay and obtain citizenship. This, with the fact that at least 20% of the electorate for the election of the TC VP will originate from the GC community, should provide the necessary safeguards to avoid what you suggest, although personally I have my doubts. Christofias initial proposal to elect the two presidents on a common ticket, like in the US, was a much better proposal from which he should not have backed down.


In my opinion the Settlers is not the main factor that would make a TC president controlled by Turkey.

The main factor is that under any unfair solution that would benefit the TCs on our expense, the TCs will be indebted to Turkey. A TC president elected in some undemocratic way will not own his position to the Cypriot people, but he will own his position to Turkey which used brute force and blackmail in order to enforce some undemocratic system which would allow her own puppets to have control over Cyprus. This means that such president would first and above all serve the interests of Turkey, not those of Cyprus.

And don't hope that the TCs will forget their debt to Turkey after such "solution". They will not forget their debt because they will know full well that if Turkey stops bullying Cypriots, then gradually democracy and human rights will be restored in Cyprus and they would lose the unfair privileges that they would be granted against us.

It is the same thing as we have now with Talat, or whoever else is the pseudo president. Talat knows that without brute force by Turkey there is no "trnc". And without "trnc" he can not be a "president". He knows that he owns his position to Turkey, that means he is indebted to Turkey, and that makes him a puppet of Turkey.

This is the real problem on this topic. The settlers are a problem in terms of the forceful change of demographics, but they are not the main lever that Turkey has to control the TCs.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:04 am

YFred wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Oracle wrote:These are all proposals and Christofias has already categorically stated that all the proposals will be nullified if the fundamental conditions for a settlement are not met. He can afford to be as "generous" as he likes with these proposals because Turkey will never accept the most basic condition which is removal of its "guarantorship" (already violated) after its withdrawal of Turkish troops and settlers ... These little "gifts" mean nothing to Turkey if it cannot have full control of Cyprus as a military base, either through occupation or guarantorship, (effectively) governmentship ...



Basically, what you are saying is that these talks are a waste of time (as it stands). Damn it; we are in agreement again. :evil:

Deniz, give them a chance. Let us see how our nationalists feel about Muhtar X by December.
:wink:


I will, I will, as Halil did promise a surprise. I cant wait. :lol:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests