YFred said:
"Don't get me wrong, I agree with what is being said but the question is where would it lead to? "
Inevitably it would bring about cross communal political cooperation for the election of the two leaders. By extension it would diminish the influence of the "motherlands" in Cypriot politics. It would force the media of each side to look at the political goings on of the other side, which has not happened in the past. It will give prestige to the two leaders when dealing with the opposite "motherland". Turkey cannot easily dismiss a GC president who was elected with TC votes. Such a vote gives him the undeniable moral legitimacy.
Practically it would be hard for deadlocks to arise when both President and Vice President are elected on the same ticket and have similar political affiliation.
Against the system would be the lack of clear ethnic divisions which for some are a necessary element and give them a sense of security.
What is easily forgotten is the dynamic of the post settlement period. It is easy to assume that people will remain fixed in the ethnic and regional divides agreed in a settlement. I think that this is unrealistic. People move and try to find the best means to improve their lives. The idea that Karpasia will blossom into a wealthy tourist and industrial complex is a pipe dream. The traditional centers of wealth of the island will remain the same and that is where people will move. In one generation the population will be as interspersed as it was pre 1960.
From this point of view the election system will minimise the probability of tension, since all citizens will be involved in the choice of both leaders.