this was posted on google news 28th june 2005
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... xhome.html
N Cyprus advert ban 'was unlawful'
By Joshua Rozenberg, Legal Editor
(Filed: 28/06/2005)
A ban by Transport for London on advertisements for holidays in Turkish-controlled North Cyprus was an unlawful and politically motivated attack on free speech, the High Court was told yesterday.
Michael Beloff, QC, made the claim on behalf of the North Cyprus Tourism Centre and a travel company specialising in package tours to the northern part of the island, which has been partitioned since Turkish troops landed there in 1974.
Mr Beloff argued that banning posters advertising North Cyprus on buses, Tube trains and other sites was an abuse of power, "animated by legally immaterial political considerations".
It was also a breach of Article 10 of the Human Rights Convention, which protects freedom of expression.
The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which funds the tourism centre, is recognised internationally only by Turkey. But companies promoting tourism in the north had advertised widely in Britain for more than 20 years, Mr Beloff said.
Last November, Transport for London refused to accept further advertisements by the tourism centre after a single complaint from Brian Coleman, the chairman of the Greater London Assembly, about an advertisement that described North Cyprus as "a sanctuary of unspoilt beauty".
It was as innocuous as an advertisement for Butlins, said counsel.
However, Transport for London said advertisements for North Cyprus were likely to "cause widespread or serious offence".
The authority later explained that Ken Livingstone, the mayor of London, had agreed that advertisements of this kind would not be acceptable.
The hearing continues.
I've been able to find no further news of the case - any ideas anyone?