cannedmoose wrote:There is a great deal of truth in what Anglo says. Most people in the UK know nothing about the Cyprus problem, in this country Cyprus is just another place in the travel agent's window - many even think that Ayia Napa is a Greek island rather than located in Cyprus. In London the GC community tend to vote labour and in seats where there is a large concentration of GCs (I believe there are 4 parliamentary seats in London in which GCs determine the balance of power), Labour are invariably returned to office. As the Labour mayor of London, Ken Livingstone therefore has a greater interest in nurturing this section of the community than the lesser numbers of TCs. As was evidenced by the poor showing at the TRNC march in London, the TCs are not a vocal population, whereas the GCs are very active in local politics. Therefore, for Ken, the choice was clear.
Apparently, the fact that a great deal (the vast majority,) of the tourist establishments in the occupied “North” Cyprus are practically stolen GC properties and consequently, any direct or indirect advertising equates to an act of accepting stolen goods (a criminal offence by most national laws,) means absolutely nothing to you to comment upon. You are only concerned and therefore concentrate your comments only on the hypothetical politically motivated act of banning such adverts by the mayor of London and you are also trying to explain it in a “logical” sense.
Of course!
brother wrote:Kifeas wroteApparently, the fact that a great deal (the vast majority,) of the tourist establishments in the occupied “North” Cyprus are practically stolen GC properties and consequently, any direct or indirect advertising equates to an act of accepting stolen goods (a criminal offence by most national laws,) means absolutely nothing to you to comment upon. You are only concerned and therefore concentrate your comments only on the hypothetical politically motivated act of banning such adverts by the mayor of London and you are also trying to explain it in a “logical” sense.
Of course!
So according to you then all the GC that are currently occupying and using TC lands and buildings (however small or large is happening) in the south is accepting stolen goods and because there is no ambargoes has been profiting from this for over 30 years, it seems to me you are the ones accepting this.
Wether recognised or not the principle is exactley the same.
gabaston wrote:look i aint arguing the rights n wrongs of the adverts, right???
i just asked if anyone knew the outcone of the trial.
anglo and moosey have said it all.
oh by the way it was only the gc londoners who were offended, nobody else.
Anglo wrote:This is contrary to what Magikthrill would have us believe - that people have weighed the information, come to a moral conclusion and then applied pressure on their elected representatives.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests