YFred wrote:Nikitas wrote:"Fighting for what you believe in comes from the heart, and one thing for sure is the bravery of the average mehmetcik."
Do not give me this crap. No other force in Cyprus proved itself to the extent that the Greek contingent did, as much as we all hate to admit it. It was the only force that held together against vastly superior forces, facing two brigades of Mehmecik backed up with tanks, artillery and direct air strikes. And above all it was the only contingent which did not harm civilians. A two day attack by two brigades pushed back the Greek batallion about 150 meters and failed to secure Nicosia ariport. Look up the distances up on Google.
As for the value of bravery , it is far down in my list. It takes no bravery for a pilot to fire rockets at his own ships, and even less to bomb a mental hospital. In modern warfare the ability to use hardware properly is much more important and the Gazi pilots could not manage that very well.
I have been living in Greece for 35 years and experienced the daily violations of air space by these brave pilots. It must take a lot of guts to fly over an undefended island, at 300 meters at 6 am in a crude a la Turca psywar operation. Trying to scare who? The sixty people who live there and their donkeys!
Do you really believe that Turkey wanted to take Nicosia airport but couldn't?
The Greeks massed soldiers in Thrace to Attack Turkey in 74. What did the General mean when he said "I would rather fire towards Athens then the Turks".
Please let as face reality when thinking about such things and not live in cuckoo land. I just cannot believe that anybody actually thinks that Greece and Cyprus and Serbs are a match against Turkey and I hate war and I hate militarism but I am realist.
What are you talking about? The General uttered those words because, like most people in Greece, they hated the Junta. It had nothing to do with being scared of the Turks, sorry to destroy your wet dreams.
You are simply a deluded Turkish nationalist. The truth is, the gap between the Turkish and Greek Armed Forces is not as big as you would like to believe. Whilst Turkey often has more equipment than Greece, it is also true that Greece often has more advanced equipment. Geography in the Aegean and in Thrace also heavily favours Greece. Look at the massive difference in size and technology of Italy and Greece during World War 2, yet Greece still defeated the Italians. The gap between Greece and Turkey is not nearly as big, despite the huge differences in population, yet you tell us that Greece has no chance! It is a testament to Greece in fact that despite its size, it has maintained a military balance with Turkey for so long. In 2008, Greece spent around $9 billion on defence, whilst Turkey spent about $11 billion, according to SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute) which is one of the most respected sources on this subject. Not a big difference, especially considering the TAF is far bigger than that of Greece, which means that Greece actually spends more per man.
Greece has also recently acquired Scalp missiles, which could cause major damage to Turkish cities. Greece's policy has always been deterrence, i.e. having the firepower to cause so much damage to Turkey that Turkey would want to avoid a conflict with Greece. And Greece certainly has sufficient firepower to fulfil this objective.