denizaksulu wrote:Oracle wrote:insan wrote:Oracle wrote:insan wrote:Oracle wrote:insan wrote:Oracle wrote:insan wrote:Kurdish MPs, can't speak Kurdish in parliament because put aside the Turkish MPs; vast majority of the Kurdish origin MPs even can't understand and speak Kurdish. Besides if some Kurdish MPs speak and understand one dialect of Kurdish, they can't speak and understand other dialect of Kurdish.
So, you
accept that ONE Official (administrative) language is more practical.
However, Turkey did worse than just ban Kurdish from official meetings: they banned Kurdish dialects from being taught or spoken generally, even by little children!
Under current circumstances of Turkey ONE Official (administrative) language is more practical.
Then I take it you will apply some
similar logic to Cyprus and support the reasonable move to have Greek as the ONE official language in Cyprus.
It is true that Turkish governments had done a very big mistake by banning the Kurdish dialects being spoken and taught.
Thank you insan. Such a thing is deplorable and would never happen in Cyprus.
In case we unite under a federal state which 2 main ethnic groups of Cyprus would have political equality, we couldn't apply some similar logic to Cyprus and support moveing to have Greek as the ONE official language in Cyprus. How?
How would TC MPs speak and understand Greek speaking MPs? How would TCs read and understand what was written on official documents?
Now do you see how impractical, hypocritical and unfair your "2 main ethnic groups" and "political equality" demands in Cyprus are?
You have quashed and silenced the Kurds, in their home territory, and you have set out to do the same with us! If anyone gives you an inch (in trust), you abuse it and take a mile ....
No... I don't see our above mentioned demands as impractical, hypocritical and unfair.
Turkish governments did that mistake under their own political and economic circumstances. There r many other states that did similar mistakes; e.g, Greece to Macedonian,Turkish and muslim minorities, Russia to it's own ethnic groups, Spain to Basque and Catalon people.. etc.
Turkey hasn't set out to do the same to GCs; it's irrelevant... How did u come to a such a conclusion?
If anyone gives us an inch(in trust) be sure we would reciprocate it by having at least an inch of trust towards who trust us...
You see only what you want to see. You are asking of such a small country like Cyprus to accept a
second Official language of Turkish, when the Kurds are denied that "luxury" by Turkey in their
own country. Let alone the fact that Greek has been the language of the majority in Cyprus for thousands of years; yet, you would impose a second foreign language simply because 10% of the population do not want to learn Greek (or English). But, you expect 20 Million Kurds to not only speak Turkish but observe a ban from even social use of their own language.
This all comes about because
you want to impose two ethnic groups with "political equality" to run the country instead of the more sensible and civilised Democracy the rest of us (majority) want. And to suit this outdated system, you add another divisive layer by insisting some speak Turkish!
And don't pretend Turkey is not out to completely remove the Greek language from Cyprus as they seem to have done a pretty good "accidental" job of renaming the GC villages ....
With your argument Oracle, are you saying Turkey is correct in banning the Kurdish Language? Therefore supporting your view that only one official language should be used in Cyprus.
IMO Turkey was wrong to ban these languages, I am sure you agree with this. Do you?
Deniz ... you are completely mixed up with the
difference between having an
Official languages and actually
banning another language.
Turkey is too big to start with but, even so,
ONE Official language is acceptable and practical. Same with the USA; ONE Official language. Same as in UK; ONE Official Language. The
Official language is the legislative and administrative language and it serves to bind a nation, able to communicate as one and allows for the smooth operation of government without multitudes of translators and duplications of paperwork.
So, Turkey is within its rights to have ONE Official language and I would not argue, nor have done, with that prerogative. So, what you and Insan have to understand is that if it is
acceptable in Turkey (your moral guide) to have only
ONE Official language, then by the same token, that applies to Cyprus! The ONE Official language of the majority and historical tradition, Greek, suffices.
Now, it is a great leap to go from having ONE Official language to then BANNING any other language which is what Turkey has done with Kurdish. No way would Cyprus have ever behaved like that even in pre-civilised times; so, it's certainly not likely to follow in Turkeys' bad footsteps now and ban ANY language. Turkish, Armenian, Russian, Sinhalese (?), French can all be freely spoken in Cyprus without constraint ... but they do not ALL/ANY become OFFICIAL languages. I cannot condemn Turkey enough for banning a language with death penalties etc to enforce it ... it is directly equivalent to ethnic genocide!