Cyprus-Forum.com

[Lit]

Eroglu says he is satisfied with Erdogan’s statements at the Congress of the AKP
Turkish Cypriot daily Kibris newspaper (05.10.09) reports that the self-styled prime minister Dervis Eroglu has evaluated the statements made by the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan on the Cyprus problem and said that the words of Mr Erdogan satisfied and relieved them. Talking to illegal Bayrak television after his return from Ankara where he participated in the 3rd Congress of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), Mr Eroglu said that a great interest was shown towards them in Ankara and added that he was given the opportunity to convey some messages with his address at the Congress of the AKP.

Pointing out that a long part of Mr Erdogan’s address at the Congress was related to the Cyprus problem, Mr Eroglu expressed his satisfaction about this fact and added that he was relieved from the fact that clear views were expressed by Mr Erdogan on the Cyprus problem.

Alleging that there are “two separate peoples, two separate democracies and two separate states” in Cyprus, Mr Eroglu noted that they have been always saying that a lasting agreement would be possible with the acceptance of “the reality of the equal regimes” and added that they were satisfied with the fact that Mr Erdogan as well drew attention to this (during the congress of the AKP).

Asked what was the aim of the statement made by Mr Erdogan that the non-solution could never be accepted, Mr Eroglu replied that Mr Erdogan “wanted to say that the current situation in Cyprus will not be accepted”.
Moreover, Kibris reports that during his address at the Congress Mr Eroglu argued that the Turkish Cypriots are fortunate to have a “motherland” such as Turkey and added that they would carry out together “the holly Cyprus cause”.

Furthermore, Turkish Cypriot daily Gunes newspaper (05.10.09) reports that in statements to CNN-Turk television, Mr Eroglu argued that in case solution is not found in the Cyprus problem “the will of the Turkish Cypriots should be recognized”. Under the title “’The citizens want two separate states’”, the paper reports that Mr Eroglu expressed the view that this will be the last chance for a solution in Cyprus and wished for this to be the last chance. Mr Eroglu argued that in case a result is not achieved in the ongoing negotiations, “the Greeks should go their way and the Turks their own”. Eroglu alleged: “Because the Turkish Cypriot people have been tired. Around 80-82% of the citizens want two separate states”. Mr Eroglu supported the statement made by Mr Erdogan in New York that “if there is no solution, the normalization of the status of the TRNC is a necessity that cannot be postponed”. He also supported the time table given by the Turkish Prime Minister and said that a referendum should be held in Spring 2010. He expressed the view that the Greek Cypriots have no intention of reaching to reconciliation.

Mr Eroglu further argued: “Turkey is a world state. It is a big state. Now the interests of the world are in accordance with the friendly relation with Turkey. Therefore, it is a reality that the voice of Turkey will be heard louder than the voice of the south and the TRNC will be recognized by the world”.

In addition, illegal Bayrak television (04.10.09) broadcast the following:
“Prime Minister Dervis Eroglu has said that the National cause has come to the stage it has today due to the sacrifices made by the Turks of Cyprus and Turkey’s efforts.

Speaking during the AK Party’s congress meeting yesterday, the TRNC Prime Minister said ‘we will continue to defend this holy cause hand in hand and heart to heart’.

Noting that Turkey has become a member of important international organizations such as the United Nations Security Council and NATO, Mr. Eroglu said that Turkey has reached its aim of modern civilization. Explaining that the Turks of Cyprus had after many years of struggle obtained freedom with the support of Motherland Turkey the Prime Minister said ‘when we look at what situation Palestine is in we once again say ‘how wonderful for us that we have this motherland’.

Prime Minister Dervis Eroglu and the leaders of the political parties with seats at the Republic’s Assembly attended the AK Party’s congress.”
(I/Ts.)

[bill cobbett]

Bleeding Propagandist Codswallop!

Codswallop?

Codswallop

The word codswallop, primarily a British English term meaning "nonsense", is an interjection of uncertain origin.

Popular etymology claims an ancient and vernacular origin for the word, with cod being interpreted from Germanic word for "bag" and later a Middle English term for the male genitals (as in codpiece). The wallop component can be referred to separately: Merriam-Webster gives it as the Middle English "walopen", meaning to gallop.

Another popular etymology places the word's origins in the brewing industry. In 1876, British soft drink maker Hiram Codd designed and patented a bottle designed specifically for fizzy drinks. Though his Codd-neck bottle was a success in the fizzy drink industry, alcohol drinkers disparaged Codd's invention, often saying it was only good for "wallop" (a slang term for beer in the late-19th century). The term soon became "Codd's Wallop" and was eventually used for anything of low-quality or rubbish.[1]

Yet another theory has to do with cod. When cod was landed it went into the sheds for cleaning & preparation. The cold & wet waste trimmings from what were large fish would hit the ground with a distinctive sound, "wallop". By association, the word codswallop became used for any significant amount of sloppy rubbish & from there, for significant spoken/written rubbish.

(from wiki)

[CBBB]

Bleeding Propagandist Codswallop!

Codswallop?

Codswallop

The word codswallop, primarily a British English term meaning "nonsense", is an interjection of uncertain origin.

Popular etymology claims an ancient and vernacular origin for the word, with cod being interpreted from Germanic word for "bag" and later a Middle English term for the male genitals (as in codpiece). The wallop component can be referred to separately: Merriam-Webster gives it as the Middle English "walopen", meaning to gallop.

Another popular etymology places the word's origins in the brewing industry. In 1876, British soft drink maker Hiram Codd designed and patented a bottle designed specifically for fizzy drinks. Though his Codd-neck bottle was a success in the fizzy drink industry, alcohol drinkers disparaged Codd's invention, often saying it was only good for "wallop" (a slang term for beer in the late-19th century). The term soon became "Codd's Wallop" and was eventually used for anything of low-quality or rubbish.[1]

Yet another theory has to do with cod. When cod was landed it went into the sheds for cleaning & preparation. The cold & wet waste trimmings from what were large fish would hit the ground with a distinctive sound, "wallop". By association, the word codswallop became used for any significant amount of sloppy rubbish & from there, for significant spoken/written rubbish.

(from wiki)

So a bit like what you have just posted!

[bill cobbett]

Pollockswallop!

[paliometoxo]

another idiot agreeing with another idiots views.. shocking

[Viewpoint]

Hold onto your hats when he becomes President next year or on second thoughts dont nothing will be happening not even talks.

[B25]

Hold onto your hats when he becomes President next year or on second thoughts dont nothing will be happening not even talks.

oooooooo! We are so afraid, idiot. Who do you think you are kidding, seriously.

Bring it on, like we have told you time and time again, you have more to lose than us. Bye Bye.

[paliometoxo]

scare tactics from turkey... they are diging their grave

[Oracle]

Turks are insignificant to the advancement of Mankind!

[Viewpoint]

Hold onto your hats when he becomes President next year or on second thoughts dont nothing will be happening not even talks.

oooooooo! We are so afraid, idiot. Who do you think you are kidding, seriously.

Bring it on, like we have told you time and time again, you have more to lose than us. Bye Bye.

What have we got to lose? we have what we want a country without bastards like you...being unrecognized is nothing in comparision.