The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


“EU WILL APPOINT A COORDINATOR”

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby barouti » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:24 pm

Viewpoint wrote:You are the minority in the south...I am the majority in the north now work it out.


George, before you answer take a good look at his avatar.

Image

So work this out. If Viewpoint supports your vision of "Cyprus for the Cypriots" then why does he have the image of a Turkish flag on his avatar?

That's right. Don't be so eager to turn against your fellow GC countrymen so easily, because the TC's consider you as one of their useful idiots.
User avatar
barouti
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 2:28 pm

Postby wallace » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:26 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
GeorgeV97qaue wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:George you are now living why we cannot find a solution and it stems clearly from your side, the mindset of the 50s 60s still exsists in the south and will ensure we stay divided forever.


VP thats not quite true is it. You have the same sort of idiots on your side that would not be prepared to budge an inch.

But with enough will for both leaders they can reach a deal that will make most people happy but you will always get people on both side calling everyone else traitors.


You are the minority in the south...I am the majority in the north now work it out.


That's right....he's the minority in the south and gladly so. Cyprus is not for sale! And we know that the majority in the north are partitionists. The only reason you have a majority like that is because you can not life by the rules of law. It satisfies people in the north that they can life from the spoils of war. Derrogations this.....derrogations that.....what is it with you people? Backward thinking.....that's what its called. The only one that has a mindset of the 50s and 60s is you! You are the ones that will loose out this time. We lost it in 74. Now come and take the rest of the island :lol:
User avatar
wallace
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Far Away

Postby Viewpoint » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:27 pm

barouti wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:You are the minority in the south...I am the majority in the north now work it out.


George, before you answer take a good look at his avatar.

Image

So work this out. If Viewpoint supports your vision of "Cyprus for the Cypriots" then why does he have the image of a Turkish flag on his avatar?

That's right. Don't be so eager to turn against your fellow GC countrymen so easily, because the TC's consider you as one of their useful idiots.


Do I have the right to love and respect my roots? The country that was there for me when I needed them the most..why do you want to demolish that right?
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby barouti » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:28 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
barouti wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Do the kurds have an internationally recognized agreement giving them 30% partnership and a veto rights?


I'm sure if offered they would readily accept.


barouti they dont....if they did I would support them 100%.


I'm certain you won't. That's why there's the PKK and the "Mountain Turk" tag.

But just to make it official, if Turkey's Kurds were to demand it Turkey should give them 30% of parliamentary seats and a veto on everything, you would support it! You're talking shit.
Last edited by barouti on Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
barouti
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 2:28 pm

Postby barouti » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:32 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Do I have the right to love and respect my roots? The country that was there for me when I needed them the most..why do you want to demolish that right?


But George wants a Cyprus for all Cypriots, no sucking cock from Turkey or Greece. If you and he forms some kind of symbiotic circle, as you're insinuating, George needs to step in now and say, "That's right! TC's can be proud of their Turkish roots and thankful to Turkey for the invasion, but GC's should scorn Greece."
Last edited by barouti on Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
barouti
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 2:28 pm

Postby wallace » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:35 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
barouti wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:You are the minority in the south...I am the majority in the north now work it out.


George, before you answer take a good look at his avatar.

Image

So work this out. If Viewpoint supports your vision of "Cyprus for the Cypriots" then why does he have the image of a Turkish flag on his avatar?

That's right. Don't be so eager to turn against your fellow GC countrymen so easily, because the TC's consider you as one of their useful idiots.


Do I have the right to love and respect my roots? The country that was there for me when I needed them the most..why do you want to demolish that right?


You have every right. Why do you want to demolish the rights of 80% of the people that life on this island?
User avatar
wallace
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Far Away

Postby barouti » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:43 pm

insan wrote:Kurdish problem is very different than Cyprus problem:

1- Turks and Kurds fought together and founded Republic of Turkey;


Indeed they did. Ataturk promised them autonomy if they lent the Ghazi a helping hand. And boy did they get burnt for it real good in 1927 when they asked Mustafa to make good on his promise.

2- Seperatist Kurds; demand soil from 4 countries to establish their Kurdish state whereas TCs demand soil on a part of Cyprus to establish a federative state or a seperate independent state.


Oh, I see. Conditions apply in this instance. So if the Kurds were only in Turkey, then independence would have been acceptable. You Turks were simply thinking for the territorial integrity of Iran, Syria and Iran.
Last edited by barouti on Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
barouti
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 2:28 pm

Postby B25 » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:48 pm

GeorgeV97qaue wrote:
B25 wrote:
GeorgeV97qaue wrote:
B25 wrote:George, I don't agree with the settlers staying and I don't agree with the troops staying for 10 years. Don't you dare speak on my behalf. You cannot just legalise the illegal criminal acts over a passage of time. This is Turkeys game and unfortunately she has soft people like you playing along with her actions.

Settlers came illegally, they have to go. In the UK the deport illegal immigrants whether they have family there or not, they are ILLEGAL and thats thats that.

Troops to stay! What? Are you F mad, it is because of them we have this shit now, no way, if the TCs want to intergrate in a normal society then they don't need those troops. With troops on the ground Turkey would be open to do to the GCs what she did in '74 all over again, she cannot be trusted on anything, infact I wouldn't even trust any signed solution she may sign today.

Who are you to give away 20% of our country to invaders and be happy with it as a compromise, we are giving away nothing, the country is one, they can live in it with us or can go back to mongolia, they were never invited here, they came by force and killed, murdered and raped tens of thousands of your fellow country men and women and don't you forget that.

So when you want to speak about giving the country away give them your arse, not mine! Katalaves!


Then my freind we will continue to live in partition. By the way who is giving away 20% of the country that is the proportion TC's owned before he war so why are athey not entitled to 20%. We are going to be a united country the difference is 20% of the country will be administered by TC's and 80% by GC's.

As for Turkey being allowed to stay for 10 years. I'm not suggesting they keep 40,000 troops here. If you had read my post at the start of my conversation with VP I stated 1000 troops no more no less.

You are what I call a Malaka. We have listened to people like yyou since 74 where has it got us. No where Turkey is still here the settlers continue to arrive and nothing is done. The Island belongs to all Cypriots wether you like it or not so no compromise no solution what cant you understand.

We have so many fu@ing idiots on both sides. How can we build trust when we wont give it a chance.


And you my dear friend is what I would call a cock sucker, go give the country to your mates, the idiots are those that have defeatists attitudes like you who wnat to 'Compromise' yeah right! We compromise the country and they shit all over us.

Bravo sou malaka of the 10th degree na pas na gamithis.


Se where has your attitude got us no where. You know fully well that turkey will not just hand Cyprus back to us no matter what the world says and does. Another 20 years their will more settlers in the north than GC's in the south. If we let it get to that point we will never get anything back will that make you happy.

Again why am I handing my country to the turks as I said they had 20% of the land before 74 so why are they not entitled to 20%. So I tell you what why dont go and suck sampsons cock because it is because of people like you that we are in the situation now. Sucking Greeces cock wanting enosis. No thanks I wanted Cyprus for the Cypriots.


Malak akouse me, I will give you an akin to what you are asking of the GC nation.

I will come you your house, shoot your son, fuck your wife and daugther take over the house and then, oh yes I will compromise and let you rent one of the rooms back. Thats what you are offering.

Well koumbare, I already told you what to do, if you like the Turkish cock that much you only have to go north.

The TCs own 20% of the land mass, this does not give them 37% of the island and 50% power sharing does, you moron.
They will accept nothing less and the more of the likes of you to kiss their arses the harder it will be for the GCs to get their country back.

Now you tell me, if you accept to happen to you what I said above I will go along with whatever you want.

Tourkospore.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Postby Oracle » Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:13 pm

GeorgeV97qaue wrote: By the way who is giving away 20% of the country that is the proportion TC's owned before he war so why are athey not entitled to 20%.


The TCs are entitled to their individual properties back and NOT 20% of the ongoing asset of RoC administered Cyprus. There is a difference between owning a house and expecting to also govern the area around it and create a separate state over your property.

All the land, in the end, belongs to the RoC.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby B25 » Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:52 pm

Oracle wrote:
GeorgeV97qaue wrote: By the way who is giving away 20% of the country that is the proportion TC's owned before he war so why are athey not entitled to 20%.


The TCs are entitled to their individual properties back and NOT 20% of the ongoing asset of RoC administered Cyprus. There is a difference between owning a house and expecting to also govern the area around it and create a separate state over your property.

All the land, in the end, belongs to the RoC.


Bravo, you said it much better than I, but sadly it will fall on deaf ears!
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest