The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The Little Book of BIG Greek Lies...

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Paphitis » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:17 pm

Guys, this is a JUNK thread, so let's not over indulge GR!, because I know for a fact he is just sitting back and having a good laugh about all of this....

This thread does not deserve so much attention...

:)
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby insan » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:32 pm

Lit wrote:
insan wrote:
alexISS wrote:
insan wrote:What u quoted was associated with the first sentence of author. The object of author was mentioned in the first sentence. However u prefered to skip the first sentence of author and qute the second sentence of author as if what mentioned in second sentence of author was his object. Thus, u supposedly twisted the object of author.


And what about the other sentences before or those after the one I quoted? Should they be quoted too lest I twist the meaning? The two sentences had individual meanings. But I ask again, how did I twist the meaning? What was it originally and what did I turn it into? :lol:


Instead coming with credibble counter arguments, u simply describe the authors arguments as "crap" just like how Greek officials behave. By quoting only the last sentence of the authors note; ur aim was to create an impression that his sole aim was getting recognition of Macedonia by making up "crap".

Actually, author has too many strong arguments and valid grounds in his articles that prove what he claim.


Let me ask you a simple question, Insane. Do you believe the Rosetta Stone contains the ancient FYROM language on it? Its a yes or no question.




In this Ancient Macedonian text there are many words which are used in today's Macedonian language. Is the ancient Macedonian language a precursor to our modern Macedonian language?

Professor Boshevski: We believe that the Ancient Macedonian language is a precursor not only to most modern Balkan languages but also to all of today's Slavic languages. We believe, and time will prove this, that all these languages have descended from the Ancient Macedonian language. Let's say that the Ancient Macedonian language is a proto-Slav language.

Until now we were led to believe that the Slavic speaking populations arrived in the Balkans around the seventh century AD speaking a "Slavic language". With your discovery we now have a basis to establish a new idea, the idea that the so-called "Slavic languages" have their roots in the ancient Macedonian language. Are we now faced with a great contradiction?

Professor Boshevski: It appears that we have come to the same conclusion. In the beginning of the interview I said that we wanted to identify the writing on this stone and if possible reconstruct its language which we naturally assumed would be the language of the Ancient Macedonians. We wanted to know what the Ancient Macedonians themselves had to say, in their own writing, in their own language, not to learn about them from other sources. Based on our discovery, on the evidence we found, we have to come to our own conclusions even if they don't agree with mainstream science. We must apply the facts as we see them even if we need to push aside the mistakes of history with regards to certain migrations of people, origins of people and origins of languages.

Here is a text left by the ancients which is satisfactorily long and rich, which gave us the opportunity to reconstruct and bring to light an alphabet and the rules for reading and writing and to reconstruct what was thought to be a lost language.

All discoveries up to now tell us that this is the text of the Ptolemais who ruled Egypt for about 300 years. We know the Ptolemaic dynasty was Macedonian. We know their origins are from the Balkans, more precisely, from the Pelagonian valley.

The next step for us is to have these facts acknowledged by world science. We need our world contemporaries to verify our work and what we have found and then to appropriately revise science as required.

There are remarks made by some who believe it's impossible to have two thousand year old words survive in a language when speaking about our current Macedonian language. In other words they say two thousand years is far too long for Ancient Macedonian words to have survived in the modern Macedonian language. If that were so then I pose this question to them: "How can some words, such as those from the third text on the Rosetta Stone, survive two thousand years and be present in today's modern Greek language?" Why is no one disputing that fact and better yet why are they not making remarks about it? Why does it bother people that in today's Macedonian language there are words the Ancient Macedonians spoke?

No one can now deny or destroy the writing on the Rosetta Stone. Once our methodology is verified and proven, then no one will be able to contest it.


http://www.maknews.com/html/articles/ri ... evski.html


Where's creddible Greek counter argument regarding this issue? Lemme check it...
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby alexISS » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:35 pm

YFred wrote:
alexISS wrote:
YFred wrote:
alexISS wrote:Guys, don't get greedy. Get Real! belongs to all Turks equally :lol:

GR has more integrity in his little finger than you and the likes of you have in your whole body, however he is an irritating slut, so attack him all you like, I give you my permission.
:lol: :lol: :lol:


"the likes of you"? What does this mean? Did I ever speak to you in such a manner? What makes you think you know who I am and what I stand for?

Your unkindness towards a fellow Cypriot is not taken lightly. Only a fascist would accuse another of what you just did unless the accused is also a fascist. As GR is not, then the likes of you are obvious.

Accuse who of what you son of a bitch? Who the fuck are you to call me a fascist? Should I accuse your whore of a mother of inbreeding or are you just an unfortunate mutation?
User avatar
alexISS
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1543
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 2:48 pm
Location: Athens, Greece

Postby Paphitis » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:36 pm

@ INSAN....

You really do need to have a read of the "What Constitutes Credible Evidence" thread....

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... t=credible

:)

If you provide a Credible Argument based on Credible Links, then we will provide you with a more Credible Counter Argument....
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby insan » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:41 pm

Paphitis wrote:@ INSAN....

You really do need to have a read of the "What Constitutes Credible Evidence" thread....

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... t=credible

:)


Come with an counter argument Bafidi... it could be from a Greek website. The above quoted view is just a part of an argument not a creddible evidence yet. I just want to hear the counter argument of Greek side regarding Macedonian language.
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby Paphitis » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:44 pm

insan wrote:
Paphitis wrote:@ INSAN....

You really do need to have a read of the "What Constitutes Credible Evidence" thread....

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... t=credible

:)


Come with an counter argument Bafidi... it could be from a Greek website. The above quoted view is just a part of an argument not a creddible evidence yet. I just want to hear the counter argument of Greek side regarding Macedonian language.


No counter argument required as you don't have a Credible Argument for me to counter...

@ INSAN....

You really do need to have a read of the "What Constitutes Credible Evidence" thread....

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... t=credible

:)

If you provide a Credible Argument based on Credible Links, then we will provide you with a more Credible Counter Argument....


:)
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby insan » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:48 pm

Paphitis wrote:
insan wrote:
Paphitis wrote:@ INSAN....

You really do need to have a read of the "What Constitutes Credible Evidence" thread....

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... t=credible

:)


Come with an counter argument Bafidi... it could be from a Greek website. The above quoted view is just a part of an argument not a creddible evidence yet. I just want to hear the counter argument of Greek side regarding Macedonian language.


No counter argument required as you don't have a Credible Argument for me to counter...

@ INSAN....

You really do need to have a read of the "What Constitutes Credible Evidence" thread....

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... t=credible

:)

If you provide a Credible Argument based on Credible Links, then we will provide you with a more Credible Counter Argument....


:)


Some last second additions to ur post ehh? Reh Bafidi, u r really too sneaky. :lol:
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby Paphitis » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:49 pm

insan wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
insan wrote:
Paphitis wrote:@ INSAN....

You really do need to have a read of the "What Constitutes Credible Evidence" thread....

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... t=credible

:)


Come with an counter argument Bafidi... it could be from a Greek website. The above quoted view is just a part of an argument not a creddible evidence yet. I just want to hear the counter argument of Greek side regarding Macedonian language.


No counter argument required as you don't have a Credible Argument for me to counter...

@ INSAN....

You really do need to have a read of the "What Constitutes Credible Evidence" thread....

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... t=credible

:)

If you provide a Credible Argument based on Credible Links, then we will provide you with a more Credible Counter Argument....


:)


Some last second additions to ur post ehh? Reh Bafidi, u r really too sneaky. :lol:


That is why I re quoted it, so that you don't miss it Insan! :)

Nothing sneaky about this at all...
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby YFred » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:52 pm

alexISS wrote:
YFred wrote:
alexISS wrote:
YFred wrote:
alexISS wrote:Guys, don't get greedy. Get Real! belongs to all Turks equally :lol:

GR has more integrity in his little finger than you and the likes of you have in your whole body, however he is an irritating slut, so attack him all you like, I give you my permission.
:lol: :lol: :lol:


"the likes of you"? What does this mean? Did I ever speak to you in such a manner? What makes you think you know who I am and what I stand for?

Your unkindness towards a fellow Cypriot is not taken lightly. Only a fascist would accuse another of what you just did unless the accused is also a fascist. As GR is not, then the likes of you are obvious.

Accuse who of what you son of a bitch? Who the fuck are you to call me a fascist? Should I accuse your whore of a mother of inbreeding or are you just an unfortunate mutation?

My my, touched a raw nerve did we? Only a fascist would say "Get Real! belongs to all Turks equally ". Its the kind of thing all fair minded GC get accused of by the fascists.
I never said anything about your mother, but I suspect you have some dark memories of yours which tend to surface at unfortunate times.
As to my linage, although my I was born in Lurucina, One grandparent from each side is not from Lurucina. Although Cyprus is a small place, it does not constitute inbreeding you asshole.
But I would be interested to hear your linage to test your inbreeding ness.
Regards.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Lit » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:56 pm

insan wrote:
No one can now deny or destroy the writing on the Rosetta Stone. Once our methodology is verified and proven, then no one will be able to contest it.[/b]

http://www.maknews.com/html/articles/ri ... evski.html


Where's creddible Greek counter argument regarding this issue? Lemme check it...


Bravo Insane. So you believe there are three languages on the Rosetta Stone....Egyptian, Greek, and (FYR) Macedonian. Excellent, I just wanted to point out your stupidity to everyone. Carry on.

:lol:
Lit
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:32 am
Location: Right behind ya

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests