Cyprus-Forum.com

[zan]

There are stereotypical traits in all aleXISS...I am basing my use of "Greek" in the area of those traits......If it makes you feel better for me to attach a disclaimer every time then I will spoon feed you and apologise for giving you the credit of being able to read between the lines......

So if I were to use the word "Turk" as a descriptor of a set of negative stereotypes you would not be bothered because you'd be "reading between the lines" and would've figured out I'm more than just a racist? I doubt it

I have not been paying attention to your use of words aleXISS because I trust you to be fair on most occasions...Accept when it comes to defending the indefensible and that is not too often from what I have seen.

[alexISS]

FOREIGN MINISTER AVCI RECEIVED MACEDONIAN FOUNDING PRIME MINISTER KLJUSEV

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Turgay Avcý yesterday (12 November) received a Macedonian delegation headed by the founding Prime Minister, President of Macedonian Sciences Academy Strategic Research Center and Executive Member of Foreign Investments Agency Nikola Kljusev who came to the TRNC to attend the ceremonies marking the 24th anniversary of the establishment of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

Speaking during the visit Nikola Kljusev expressed his country’s willingness to take steps towards improving cooperation with the TRNC.

Stating that warm-hearted Turkish Cypriot people made him to feel himself at home, Kljusev said his country would always be by the side of Turkish Cypriots.

Kljusev pointed out that the Greek Cypriot side was creating problems for Turkey, Macedonia and TRNC, adding that the future should be established by laying aside chauvinism and the past.

Underlining that sport, cultural, commercial and every kind of relations should be established between the TRNC and Azerbaijan, Kljusev said: “Therefore, we could convince those who don’t want us.”

Explaining that the two countries should discuss the ways of improving cooperation between them, Kljusev said the Foreign Investments Agency in Azerbaijan was a turning point for them.

For his part, Foreign Minister Avcý expressed pressure for hosting Kljusev and his accompanying delegation in the TRNC.

Foreign Minister Avcý announced that he would pay a visit to Macedonia in the near future.

Avcý explaining that the Turkish Cypriot people had not come to these days very easily, did not want to experience the painful years of the past again, said the isolation imposed upon the Turkish Cypriot people would be overcome with the support of friendly countries like Macedonia.

Stating that this visit have created the opportunity to improve bilateral relations between the two countries, Avcý said the TRNC and Macedonia could establish close relations in many fields such as trade, education, culture, arts and sports.

Pointing to the Greek Cypriot side’s attempts to dampen the improving relations between the TRNC and other countries, Avcý said despite this, the relations established would be further strengthened; representative offices would be established in these countries such efforts of the Turkish Cypriots would continue.

Stressing that the Turkish Cypriot people had come to these days with the help of Turkey, Avcý said: “This beautiful country is your home; Turkish Cypriot people are embracing you.”


http://www.trncinfo.com/tanitmadairesi/ ... 131107.htm

[alexISS]

I have not been paying attention to your use of words aleXISS because I trust you to be fair on most occasions...Accept when it comes to defending the indefensible and that is not too often from what I have seen.

Can you be more specific? Did I defend Greece on the displacement of Macedonian Slavs after the Balkan wars? Did I defend Greece on the Asia Minor campaign? Did I defend Greece on the way it treated the Muslim (Turkish, Roma and Gypsy) minority up till the 80s?

No

So, what are you talking about?

[halil]

Congrats GR for the constructive thread. Now you'll have to deal with Cyprus Greeks. I wish you the best of luck.

It is not the GR writings of thread .... i am writing for him .........

good afternoon all ...........Goodmorning Greeks !!!!!!!!!!

[YFred]

Congrats GR for the constructive thread. Now you'll have to deal with Cyprus Greeks. I wish you the best of luck.

It is not the GR writings of thread .... i am writing for him .........

good afternoon all ...........Goodmorning Greeks !!!!!!!!!!

Halil, you are even braver than GR.

[insan]

As long as the Greek State denies our existence as Macedonians with rights and privileges, we will continue to publish these types of articles

In other words "we will continue to make up crap about you until you recognize us as "Macedonia" ".
Well, nobody cares about their "articles" and there's no way in hell they'll get Greece's recognition so, good news Get Real!, there'll soon be more crap for you to eat

[NOTE: Our apologies to the Greek people if they find these articles offensive. Our objective here is NOT to create tension between the Macedonian and Greek people but rather to highlight the problem that exists within the Greek State and its institutions. As long as the Greek State denies our existence as Macedonians with rights and privileges, we will continue to publish these types of articles.]

He also notes... taking just a little part of the note out there and trying to change it's meaning does not help solving the problem between Macedonians and Greeks.

How did I change the meaning?!?

What u quoted was associated with the first sentence of author. The object of author was mentioned in the first sentence. However u prefered to skip the first sentence of author and qute the second sentence of author as if what mentioned in second sentence of author was his object. Thus, u supposedly twisted the object of author.

[alexISS]

What u quoted was associated with the first sentence of author. The object of author was mentioned in the first sentence. However u prefered to skip the first sentence of author and qute the second sentence of author as if what mentioned in second sentence of author was his object. Thus, u supposedly twisted the object of author.

And what about the other sentences before or those after the one I quoted? Should they be quoted too lest I twist the meaning? The two sentences had individual meanings. But I ask again, how did I twist the meaning? What was it originally and what did I turn it into?

[insan]

What u quoted was associated with the first sentence of author. The object of author was mentioned in the first sentence. However u prefered to skip the first sentence of author and qute the second sentence of author as if what mentioned in second sentence of author was his object. Thus, u supposedly twisted the object of author.

And what about the other sentences before or those after the one I quoted? Should they be quoted too lest I twist the meaning? The two sentences had individual meanings. But I ask again, how did I twist the meaning? What was it originally and what did I turn it into?

Instead coming with credibble counter arguments, u simply describe the authors arguments as "crap" just like how Greek officials behave. By quoting only the last sentence of the authors note; ur aim was to create an impression that his sole aim was getting recognition of Macedonia by making up "crap".

Actually, author has too many strong arguments and valid grounds in his articles that prove what he claim.

[Lit]

What u quoted was associated with the first sentence of author. The object of author was mentioned in the first sentence. However u prefered to skip the first sentence of author and qute the second sentence of author as if what mentioned in second sentence of author was his object. Thus, u supposedly twisted the object of author.

And what about the other sentences before or those after the one I quoted? Should they be quoted too lest I twist the meaning? The two sentences had individual meanings. But I ask again, how did I twist the meaning? What was it originally and what did I turn it into?

Instead coming with credibble counter arguments, u simply describe the authors arguments as "crap" just like how Greek officials behave. By quoting only the last sentence of the authors note; ur aim was to create an impression that his sole aim was getting recognition of Macedonia by making up "crap".

Actually, author has too many strong arguments and valid grounds in his articles that prove what he claim.

Let me ask you a simple question, Insane. Do you believe the Rosetta Stone contains the ancient FYROM language on it? Its a yes or no question.

[alexISS]

Instead coming with credibble counter arguments, u simply describe the authors arguments as "crap" just like how Greek officials behave. By quoting only the last sentence of the authors note; ur aim was to create an impression that his sole aim was getting recognition of Macedonia by making up "crap".

Actually, author has too many strong arguments and valid grounds in his articles that prove what he claim.

The author says that until Greece does "something", he will post more of these articles. This means that if Greece satisfies his "demands", he will stop. But, why would he stop enlightening people if Greece were to recognize "Macedonia"? Doesn't the world deserve to know the truth about those evil "Grekomans"? Or are they evil only as long as they do not recognize "Macedonia"?

Now, the word "crap" was my addition to what he said. Of course he considers his shitty articles to be "credible", the fact that I did not quote that sentence changes nothing