Cyprus-Forum.com

[halil]

The European Court of Human Rights’ Grand Chamber has ordered Turkey to pay 108 thousand Euros in compensation to the families of 18 Greek Cypriots claimed to have gone missing or killed during the 1974 .

The court also ordered Turkey to pay 72 thousand Euros for the court’s expenses but stopped short of holding Ankara responsible for the deaths of the Greek Cypriots.

Each of the Greek Cypriot applicants will be paid 12 thousand Euros in compensation.

The case brought before the European Court of Human Right’s Grand Chamber concerns an application brought by the families of 18 Greek Cypriots, nine of whom disappeared after being captured and detained during the 1974 Turkish Peace Operation.

The nine other applicants are or were relatives of the men who went missing.

In a earlier judgment on the 10th January 2008, the Court held, by six votes to one, that there had been a continuing violation of Article 2,3 and 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning Turkey’s failure to conduct an effective investigation into the whereabouts and fate of the applicants.

The ruling which is the first on a missing persons claim is important as it could set an example for similar cases in the future.

The court ruled that Turkey violated articles 2,3,4,5,8,10,12,13,14 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

[Lit]

The court ruled that Turkey violated articles 2,3,4,5,8,10,12,13,14 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Lit: Wouldnt it have been easier for the court to tell us which articles Turkey did not violate?

ECHR: Turkey, your guilty! You did not violated articles 1,6,7,9,11 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Zan: Phew! What a relief!

Insan: Racist Hellenes! Turkey is not guilty in articles of 1,6,7,9,11 of the EU convention but what about Makarios?

Yfonts: What do you expect Insan, to hear the truth from the EOKA fascists?

[insan]

The court ruled that Turkey violated articles 2,3,4,5,8,10,12,13,14 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Lit: Wouldnt it have been easier for the court to tell us which articles Turkey did not violate?

ECHR: Turkey, your guilty! You did not violated articles 1,6,7,9,11 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Zan: Phew! What a relief!

Insan: Racist Hellenes! Turkey is not guilty in articles of 1,6,7,9,11 of the EU convention but what about Makarios?

Yfonts: What do you expect Insan, to hear the truth from the EOKA fascists?

I didn't deny any rulings of ECHR, did I? If I did, show me just a single example that I denied any of the rulings of ECHR. Questioning the allegations regarding the missings is not denial of ECHR rulings... Is it?

U r mixing ur nuts with Karamanlis' pirillis.

[YFred]

The court ruled that Turkey violated articles 2,3,4,5,8,10,12,13,14 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Lit: Wouldnt it have been easier for the court to tell us which articles Turkey did not violate?

ECHR: Turkey, your guilty! You did not violated articles 1,6,7,9,11 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Zan: Phew! What a relief!

Insan: Racist Hellenes! Turkey is not guilty in articles of 1,6,7,9,11 of the EU convention but what about Makarios?

Yfonts: What do you expect Insan, to hear the truth from the EOKA fascists?

What about the rights of my 3 neighbours. Which rights did roc violate when 21 years old young man at the prime of his life, another with wife and 3 children with one on the way, farm hands disappeared in 1963. What about the rights of a nurse put through the mincing machine. Which one of the rights were violated 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 .........20 thousand millionth.
Which of their rights were violated in 1963.

You stupid excuse for a human.
You can take your echr decision and I think you know what to do with it, being greek an all.

[bill cobbett]

The court ruled that Turkey violated articles 2,3,4,5,8,10,12,13,14 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Lit: Wouldnt it have been easier for the court to tell us which articles Turkey did not violate?

ECHR: Turkey, your guilty! You did not violated articles 1,6,7,9,11 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Zan: Phew! What a relief!

Insan: Racist Hellenes! Turkey is not guilty in articles of 1,6,7,9,11 of the EU convention but what about Makarios?

Yfonts: What do you expect Insan, to hear the truth from the EOKA fascists?

Wonder what VP would have said?

[YFred]

The court ruled that Turkey violated articles 2,3,4,5,8,10,12,13,14 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Lit: Wouldnt it have been easier for the court to tell us which articles Turkey did not violate?

ECHR: Turkey, your guilty! You did not violated articles 1,6,7,9,11 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Zan: Phew! What a relief!

Insan: Racist Hellenes! Turkey is not guilty in articles of 1,6,7,9,11 of the EU convention but what about Makarios?

Yfonts: What do you expect Insan, to hear the truth from the EOKA fascists?

Wonder what VP would have said?

Just read what I said, Billagui Villagui Boreki do Norui meda mavra do vragui.

[bill cobbett]

The court ruled that Turkey violated articles 2,3,4,5,8,10,12,13,14 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Lit: Wouldnt it have been easier for the court to tell us which articles Turkey did not violate?

ECHR: Turkey, your guilty! You did not violated articles 1,6,7,9,11 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Zan: Phew! What a relief!

Insan: Racist Hellenes! Turkey is not guilty in articles of 1,6,7,9,11 of the EU convention but what about Makarios?

Yfonts: What do you expect Insan, to hear the truth from the EOKA fascists?

Wonder what VP would have said?

Just read what I said, Billagui Villagui Boreki do Norui meda mavra do vragui.

Reh Freddouibouhorefkishiftetelli, you know that beer I promised in a Free Kyrenia? Can we make it in a Free Strasbourg or Free Geneva? (Anyone know how deep Lake Geneva is?)

[Oracle]

Listen GC/fair-minded guys ...

Halil has worded this to look like it's all about "compensation" ... when the money is obviously an irrelevancy to the families and the real news is how this is yet more judged crimes by Turkey ....

May I suggest we move over to GR!'s thread (started before halil) where a more honest representation is to be found ...

[YFred]

The court ruled that Turkey violated articles 2,3,4,5,8,10,12,13,14 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Lit: Wouldnt it have been easier for the court to tell us which articles Turkey did not violate?

ECHR: Turkey, your guilty! You did not violated articles 1,6,7,9,11 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Zan: Phew! What a relief!

Insan: Racist Hellenes! Turkey is not guilty in articles of 1,6,7,9,11 of the EU convention but what about Makarios?

Yfonts: What do you expect Insan, to hear the truth from the EOKA fascists?

Wonder what VP would have said?

Just read what I said, Billagui Villagui Boreki do Norui meda mavra do vragui.

Reh Freddouibouhorefkishiftetelli, you know that beer I promised in a Free Kyrenia? Can we make it in a Free Strasbourg or Free Geneva? (Anyone know how deep Lake Geneva is?)

Dear dear dearie me boy. I was wandering how long before you would revert to the alternative GC version of the Geneva Convention.

Which law do you intend to use? No 31 - See if you can swim with a vizzago rotso tied to you legs you old bastard clause?

You self fornicating vaselinised charlui you.

[Lit]

The court ruled that Turkey violated articles 2,3,4,5,8,10,12,13,14 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Lit: Wouldnt it have been easier for the court to tell us which articles Turkey did not violate?

ECHR: Turkey, your guilty! You did not violated articles 1,6,7,9,11 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Zan: Phew! What a relief!

Insan: Racist Hellenes! Turkey is not guilty in articles of 1,6,7,9,11 of the EU convention but what about Makarios?

Yfonts: What do you expect Insan, to hear the truth from the EOKA fascists?

Wonder what VP would have said?

Probably something about a donkey, a saddle, and a race horse.