The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The Spectrum of Probability about God's existence...

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.
Post a reply

Where do you fit in about God's existence or non existence?

Strong theist: 100% probability of God - 'I do not believe, I know'.
4
14%
De facto theist: very high probability but short of 100% - 'I strongly believe in God and live my life on the assumption he is there'.
3
11%
Higher than 50%, but not very high. Technically agnostic but leaning towards theism - 'I am very uncertain but I am inclined to believe in God'.
2
7%
Impartial agnostic: exactly 50% - 'God's existence and non-existence are exacly equiprobable'.
2
7%
Technically agnostic: lower than 50% but not very low. Technically agnostic but leaning towards atheism - 'I don't know whether God exists but I'm inclined to be sceptical'.
0
No votes
De facto atheist: very low probability but short of zero. 'I cannot know for certain , but I think God is very improbable, and I live my life on the assumption he is not there'.
9
32%
Strong atheist: 'I do not believe there is a God because I know he does not exist'.
8
29%
 
Total votes : 28

Re: New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

Postby Tim Drayton » Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:14 pm

Cap wrote:http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/audio/newevidence.htm


This analysis is based on a literal interpretation of the text of the Bible, so if this text actually says God only created people and animals but not the Universe, then the whole analysis breaks down.
User avatar
Tim Drayton
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8799
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:32 am
Location: Limassol/Lemesos
Top

Re: New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

Postby Get Real! » Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:23 pm

Tim Drayton wrote:
Cap wrote:http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/audio/newevidence.htm


This analysis is based on a literal interpretation of the text of the Bible, so if this text actually says God only created people and animals but not the Universe, then the whole analysis breaks down.

And on the eighth day God created Tim Drayton... :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia
Top

Re: New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

Postby zan » Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:42 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:
Cap wrote:http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/audio/newevidence.htm


This analysis is based on a literal interpretation of the text of the Bible, so if this text actually says God only created people and animals but not the Universe, then the whole analysis breaks down.

And on the eighth day God created Tim Drayton... :lol:


Which was known as "Nortday".......Anangram of Drayton!! 8) :oops:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm
Top

Re: New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

Postby Get Real! » Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:44 pm

zan wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:
Cap wrote:http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/audio/newevidence.htm


This analysis is based on a literal interpretation of the text of the Bible, so if this text actually says God only created people and animals but not the Universe, then the whole analysis breaks down.

And on the eighth day God created Tim Drayton... :lol:


Which was known as "Nortday".......Anangram of Drayton!! 8) :oops:

Pun intended? :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia
Top

Re: New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God

Postby zan » Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:46 pm

Get Real! wrote:
zan wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:
Cap wrote:http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/audio/newevidence.htm


This analysis is based on a literal interpretation of the text of the Bible, so if this text actually says God only created people and animals but not the Universe, then the whole analysis breaks down.

And on the eighth day God created Tim Drayton... :lol:


Which was known as "Nortday".......Anangram of Drayton!! 8) :oops:

Pun intended? :lol:



If my spelling was better than I would have claimed it!! :oops: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm
Top

Postby Talisker » Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:51 pm

An intriguing hypothesis:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/6318034/Could-the-Large-Hadron-Collider-be-held-back-by-its-own-future.html
User avatar
Talisker
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1029
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:41 pm
Location: UK
Top
Previous
Post a reply

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron
© 2002 - 2015 Cyprus-Forum.com
powered by phpbb
Cyprus Forum RSS Feed Cyprus Forum Atom Feed