Piratis wrote:Have it ever passed your mind that the balance in the 1960 agreements with all those 30% and 40% and vetos etc, was actually in favor of TCs and this is one of the reasons we had conflicts?
Ok, let's assume that TCs having excessive rights were one of the reasons why we had conflicts. What would happen if we had one man one vote in Cyprus in 1960? You know it...we would have Enosis. You can't deny this after what happenned in 1960s. Makarious publicly announced that independence was a step for Enosis. Therefore, how could you expect TCs not to ask for safeguards against Enosis?
Piratis wrote:I said that this was one of the problems, not the only one. GCs also have made mistakes that led to the conflict. The main mistake was that they didn't believe in independence and they were trying for something else instead.
There you go. You just said it. GCs didn't believe in independence. If there were no safeguards for TCs in the RoC constitution, Enosis was inevitable. I still don't understand how you can complain about TC veto rights when you accept that your side didn't believe in independence and they were trying something else (i.e. Enosis) How were TCs supposed to protect themselves against Enosis if they didn't have vetoes?
Now TCs have the power (i hope) to make it work, but they still have their maximalistic goals.
I don't agree that only TCs have the power. TCs have the land and the GCs have the representation. TCs complain about having no international representation, GCs complain about their refugees. Both sides have something that the other side wants. Both sides have the power to contribute to a win-win situation.