Omer Seyhan wrote:
1. Sharing ethnicity requires a common ancestry! You cannot even prove yours!
That's because you made the mistake that there was a break in ethnicity and one lost touch with their roots. This happened to Turks with their nomadic habits and revisionism but is not common in the Greek world of strong record keeping (especially more recently with the Byzantines).
2. Common proper name - This is impossible since the Mycaeneans did not refer to themselves as "Greeks". But you could call them Anatolian if you like since that is the land mass from which they came.
The Mycenaeans were from the Peloponnese!
3. There is no memory of Greek migration to Cyprus. All we have are a few ruins. In fact, I dispute that Greek Cypriots are descended from the Mycaeneans. Why not? You can't prove it. Language means nothing. They speak English in Tonga and Jamaica, it doesn't mean they are the same ethnicity as the English.
We know exactly when and why English was introduced to Tonga and the memory of Greek migrations are written in countless records ... a little foreign to Turks as they did not learn to read and write until recently and then set about distorting history. No wonder it seems so strange to you ...
You claim the Mycaeneans were "Greek" even though "Greek" was not a term recognised then... how is that possible? Shall I call the Anglo-Saxons English? Or the Vikings - Norwegians? Or the Gaulish French? Or the Urartians Armenians? And what of the Etrusians, shall we call them Italian-Slovenes? Do you see how stupid your argument is?
You have this the wrong way round ... The word Greek is an English word since that is what we use to communicate now ... that does not mean Greeks did not exist until the English came along and gave them a word. Just because you cannot cope with names in context, it doesn't mean others cannot.
Are you in kindergarten still?
And so what if the Mycaeneans did come to Cyprus? How about the arrival of many other people after the Mycaeneans? How about the Jews of the Roman period, Nestorian Christians (Copts, Assyrians, Chaldeans) who fled to Cyprus, which was a refuge for Christians after the fall of Jerusalem? How about the Arab and Turkish slaves prior to 1571 who were forced to convert to Christianity? How about the Armenians too who settled here or the Templar knights, Franks, Latins, or Maronites?
It didn't stop with the Mycaenians so don't get too hung up ... the Greeks have been sailing to and fro between Cyprus and the other Hellenic holds for thousands of years until the present! BTW The Greeks did not tend to mix with barbarians ...
All these people settled in Cyprus well after the Mycaeneans, constantly adding to the Cypriot DNA pool, how can you dismiss them but emphasize the Mycaeneans?
There is no evidence of such mixing between Ottomans and Cypriots ... other than possible sporadic events which have not left a fingerprint ...
You cannot be so selective about your history or try to rewrite it Simon because it suits your political goals or the present trends.... ok?
Seems to me, between your revisionism and "little knowledge" you have made a Greek salad of your "theories" ...