Oracle wrote:Paphitis wrote:[The interpretation is quite clear to most people on this forum, and you have just been playing word games and even come up with the most ridiculous interpretations of things.
No Paphitis ... you had the interpretation completely wrong and The Cypriot confirmed it. I wasn't the one who made a thing about it, but you chose to make assumptions about TCs which were not implied in my posts.
The Cypriot confirmed that it does not include
ALL TCs and nothing more, which means your argument just does not hold water.
Most TCs are in fact Muslim, but may not be over religious zealots, that is true.
But I would say that Atheists TCs are a minority, and so you are still wrong no matter how you wish to slice this debate and wiggle and squirm like a menopausal hyena....
You even stated that anyone who puts Cyprus and its legitimate inhabitants first is some kind of endorsement of Turkish Settlers!!!
Oracle wrote:
I did nothing of the sort and unless you want to be ridiculed over that claim also, you had better accept you are grasping at straws to save face.
Once again, this is what I stated earlier:!
The Cypriot was not referring to the 300,000 Settlers, because then he would not have classified them as Turkish/Muslim.
and this is what you stated in reply:
Oh but that's precisely how he DID classify them!
So how stupid can you get, because a Turkish settler can only be classified as a Turkish Settler and not as a Turk/Muslim!
Nice one Oracle...and now you have the audacity to say that I am amending interpretations to suit my argument?
Oracle wrote:
Your amendment is there for all to see!
You legless argument is self evident.
You categorically state that a Cypriot is
NOT a Turk/Muslim and you couldn't be anymore wrong.
So give it up because it's over and your not going to turn the tables and wiggle your way out.
I'll accept you must be very, very tired ... so off you go for a nap!