turkcyp wrote:When you say puppet master it implies that there maybe scenarios where puppets (TCs) would not like but puppet master (Turkey) still approves and that scenario becomes reality. It basically means that we are forced to accept things that is against our own wish. As I have said on the previous paragraph, first of all I do think that chances of such a scenario existing s very slim, and secondly even if it existed it would not be accepted by TCs and hence will not become reality.
turkcyp wrote:Blame the silent majority always. By not actively opposing to those arrangements and choosing the leaders that support those arrangekments in the past we had given a TACIT approval of their existence.
Metecyp wrote: Just because TCs policies had been alligned with Turkeys's policies does not mean that Turkey is the puppet master and TCs are the puppets.
magikthrill wrote:a bicommunal republic with certain bizonal restrictions and no turkish military presence would satisfy many TCs but this would NEVER happen because it does not satisfy Turkey.
MicAtCyp wrote:Metecyp wrote: Just because TCs policies had been alligned with Turkeys's policies does not mean that Turkey is the puppet master and TCs are the puppets.
Are they aligned???? Hundreds of times we ve seen Turkey "aligning you up" to what she wants. There where we could see some progress we see Turkey stepping in and distroying everything.
Two recent examples:
1.The matter of opening 2 new checkpoints in Nicosia.
2.The matter of Varoshia. (quote Sezer: I did not give such an authorisation to Talat"
magikthrill wrote:a bicommunal republic with certain bizonal restrictions and no turkish military presence would satisfy many TCs but this would NEVER happen because it does not satisfy Turkey.
MicAtCyp wrote: Metecyp wrote:
Just because TCs policies had been alligned with Turkeys's policies does not mean that Turkey is the puppet master and TCs are the puppets.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests