The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Financial Times or Turkeys?

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Financial Times or Turkeys?

Postby The Cypriot » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:35 pm

Engaging Turkey
Published in the Financial Times: September 8 2009 19:59

Turkey and Armenia, neighbours divided by bitter conflict for almost a century, are intent on early diplomatic recognition and reopening their long-closed border. That was the good news that slipped out last week. The plan still has to get mutual parliamentary approval. There is strong nationalist opposition on both sides. But the Swiss-mediated negotiations have made much better progress than was expected.

Ankara’s announcement last week of new measures to ease cultural restrictions on the restive Kurdish minority was also good news. They stop short of constitutional amendments or an amnesty for former militants, but they are a step in the right direction.

Both actions should encourage faster progress in the languishing negotiations on Turkey’s membership application to join the European Union. Yet those talks are caught in a vicious cycle of mutual disenchantment, as spelt out this week in a disturbing report by the Independent Commission on Turkey, a group of eminent Europeans chaired by Martti Ahtisaari, former president of Finland.

They argue that EU credibility is at stake because Turkey is not being treated as a normal accession candidate. In spite of a unanimous decision five years ago to open the talks, France, Germany and Austria are all now backing an alternative “privileged partnership” that stops well short of full membership. France is blocking negotiations on several issues. So is Cyprus. Such behaviour is dangerously counter-productive.

Failure to reach agreement on the reunification of Cyprus has poisoned the process. The EU members made a fundamental mistake in allowing that divided island to join without a deal. Now there is little incentive for the Greek Cypriots, already enjoying the full benefits of membership, to negotiate one in good faith.

As Europe hesitates, Turkey also drags its feet. There is little political incentive in backing EU membership in Ankara. Young Turks are increasingly sceptical. There are worrying signs of anti-democratic behaviour, too, such as the government’s latest imposition of massive fines on the Dogan media group, the country’s largest.

Both the EU and Turkey should urgently refocus attention both on the Cyprus talks and the wider accession negotiations. To allow them to fail by default would be a tragedy. It would also sour relations between the EU and a vital partner whose engagement is essential for Europe’s future security, prosperity and dynamism.

Are we to let the FT get away with this unadulterated drivel? Surely the free Cypriots need the ‘incentive’ of a reunified homeland on a basis consistent with the European rights and freedoms - just like all other free Europeans.

Not a legitimised apartheid arrangement enshrining racist separation, abandonment of birthrights and continued interference by foreign military aggressors.

Now do you see the devastating harm caused by allowing the world to perceive the free citizens of the Republic of Cyprus as petty-minded ‘Greek’ Cypriots?

I'm hopeful this article will prove extremely costly to the FT - in financial terms - the only terms these bastards understand.
User avatar
The Cypriot
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2326
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:27 pm

Re: Financial Times or Turkeys?

Postby Oracle » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:44 pm

The Cypriot wrote:Now do you see the devastating harm caused by allowing the world to perceive the free citizens of the Republic of Cyprus as petty-minded ‘Greek’ Cypriots?


Why are there inverted commas flanking "Greek"?
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Re: Financial Times or Turkeys?

Postby The Cypriot » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:48 pm

Oracle wrote:
The Cypriot wrote:Now do you see the devastating harm caused by allowing the world to perceive the free citizens of the Republic of Cyprus as petty-minded ‘Greek’ Cypriots?


Why are there inverted commas flanking "Greek"?


Ask an Armenian or a Maronite.
User avatar
The Cypriot
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2326
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:27 pm

Re: Financial Times or Turkeys?

Postby Oracle » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:57 pm

The Cypriot wrote:
Oracle wrote:
The Cypriot wrote:Now do you see the devastating harm caused by allowing the world to perceive the free citizens of the Republic of Cyprus as petty-minded ‘Greek’ Cypriots?


Why are there inverted commas flanking "Greek"?


Ask an Armenian or a Maronite.


So, your main concern is that only 'Greek' Cypriots are perceived as "petty-minded" and not the whole repertoire of Cypriots?
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Re: Financial Times or Turkeys?

Postby The Cypriot » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:27 pm

Oracle wrote:
The Cypriot wrote:
Oracle wrote:
The Cypriot wrote:Now do you see the devastating harm caused by allowing the world to perceive the free citizens of the Republic of Cyprus as petty-minded ‘Greek’ Cypriots?


Why are there inverted commas flanking "Greek"?


Ask an Armenian or a Maronite.


So, your main concern is that only 'Greek' Cypriots are perceived as "petty-minded" and not the whole repertoire of Cypriots?


No. My main concern is what the FT published.
User avatar
The Cypriot
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2326
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:27 pm

Re: Financial Times or Turkeys?

Postby YFred » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:39 pm

Oracle wrote:
The Cypriot wrote:
Oracle wrote:
The Cypriot wrote:Now do you see the devastating harm caused by allowing the world to perceive the free citizens of the Republic of Cyprus as petty-minded ‘Greek’ Cypriots?


Why are there inverted commas flanking "Greek"?


Ask an Armenian or a Maronite.


So, your main concern is that only 'Greek' Cypriots are perceived as "petty-minded" and not the whole repertoire of Cypriots?

I think some of us predicted that some time ago that EU is tired of the Cyprus Problem and can see right through your unnecessary delaying tactics for the hope that you can get more at some stage in the future. It's costin them time and time is money and money talks, dearest lady.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby -mikkie2- » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:45 pm

The FT is as pro-Turkey as they come!
-mikkie2-
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1298
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 12:11 am

Postby insan » Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:04 pm

The EU members made a fundamental mistake in allowing that divided island to join without a deal. Now there is little incentive for the Greek Cypriots, already enjoying the full benefits of membership, to negotiate one in good faith.


Fundamental mistake? :lol: It was a very well pre-planned plot. :lol:

GCs enjoy the full benefits of EU memebership? :lol: Their soci-ecomomic conditions were far better before they joined EU. :lol:
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Re: Financial Times or Turkeys?

Postby Get Real! » Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:14 pm

The Cypriot wrote:"The EU members made a fundamental mistake in allowing that divided island to join without a deal."

The fundamental mistake was to ignore international law in the first place; which calls for the complete withdrawal of Turkish forces and the dismantling of the illegal puppet “state”.

http://www.un.int/cyprus/resolut.htm
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Oracle » Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:23 pm

insan wrote:
The EU members made a fundamental mistake in allowing that divided island to join without a deal. Now there is little incentive for the Greek Cypriots, already enjoying the full benefits of membership, to negotiate one in good faith.


Fundamental mistake? :lol: It was a very well pre-planned plot. :lol:


For what purpose? Just to keep Turkey out of the EU?

GCs enjoy the full benefits of EU memebership? :lol: Their soci-ecomomic conditions were far better before they joined EU. :lol:


Any short-term sacrifice in socio-economics will be more than made up for once the French forces have familiarised themselves with military sea-manoeuvres around our shores. :)

Another due soon, methinks ....
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest