The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Bakoyiannis on system of guarantees

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:21 am

Nikitas wrote:VP you realise we are talking about federal states with defined territory, a great deal of autonomy and therefore no excuse for anyone to encroach on the other's area or inner dealings. BOth communities will share the EU civil service positions so there is no chance the GCs could outmanouver the TCs in the EU.

As to the EU turning a blind eye to wrongdoings by any state, there is the precedent of the fascist elected in Austria. The EU essentially put Austria on ice till he got out. The EU does not give any member a blank check.


We have no reason to trust the EU without Turkey becoming a full member we will not dump our guarantee, forget it we will not place ourselves in unnecessary danger. If GC try to step outside of the agreements between our 2 states they can easily opt out by saying its an internal problem eg the Blacks revolt in France and do nothing to aid us.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby kurupetos » Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:26 am

Turks should not accept anything, because otherwise it will be more difficult for the RoC and Greece to justify their veto in December. :wink:
User avatar
kurupetos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18855
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Cyprus

Postby Kikapu » Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:44 am

Viewpoint wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Turkeys rights for and interim period until they also enter the EU using the time to build trust and cooperaiton after which we will no longer need such guarantees.


VP, in all seriousness, because you have repeated this statement many times before and I'm having a hard time to really understand it.

Why is the EU security guarantees are not good enough for the TCs if Turkey is not a EU member, but all is OK, if Turkey was a EU member.?? What would Turkey do as a EU member unilaterally, if the rest of the EU is not willing to act to protect the TCs as you suspect in time of crises, if Turkey was not a EU member.? In another words, if the EU did not act to help the TCs in time of need before Turkey is a EU member, they are not going to act to protect the TCs, if Turkey was a EU member, are they.? How could Turkey then do anything as a EU member unilaterally to help the TCs.??? Do you expect Turkey to go against the wishes of the EU and if that is the answer, then why would the EU will ever want Turkey as a renegade EU member.??

Also, a unified Cyprus will be one country with two Federal states, lets say like the US, so how can Turkey be a guarantor to the north state if the south state does not want them, because it is still one country, is it not.? How do you get around this problem, because in effect, Turkey will have the right to intervene/invade in any part of Cyprus if they wanted as she sees fit, because the country of Cyprus gave that OK to do so, just like in 1960, because Turkey never had the right to ONLY help the TCs, but to help restore the government of Cyprus in time of crisis for all Cypriots, and since in 1974 Turkey did not live up to her responsibilities as a guarantor, and in fact violated all of her responsibilities, how do you expect the GCs to ever agree for Turkey to be a guarantor for any part of Cyprus, because as the saying goes, there is no such thing as being a little pregnant and in the same way, Turkey cannot just be guarantor to only one part of Cyprus and not the rest. This will be impossible to draft an agreement where every inch of Cyprus will be under the Federal Government, which Turkey will violate it's sovereignty if they ever came to Cyprus again under any reason. Just where do you draw the line as to when Turkey can and cannot come if she were to be a guarantor. Only after 1 TC is killed by a revenge seeking GC husband, after 10 TCs killed at a football game riots.? When exactly.??


Its OK for the GCs to have Greece in the EU to support their everymove but not us? why is that? Turkey outside of the EU can move in times of need she is not bound to what the EU demands...when she is in the EU as a full member the 2nd largest she will have the clout to stop any problems that may arise in a united Cyprus, the EU without Turkeys influence is no security at all.


Basically VP, you did not answer my questions at all, which then leads people to suspect any guarantees from Turkey to the TCs to be anything other than just providing security for them You got an A for attempt in the first part of my question but an F for it's content. As to my second part of the question which you did not even attempt to answer, you got an F all around for that one.! If you can't make an argument as to why you want something, how are you going to convince people to accept it at face value. You always say that some people will not learn from the past, but in reality, people have learned from the past and that's the reason why the GCs will reject any guarantorship from Turkey (or anyone else for that matter), either before Turkey is in the EU or after Turkey is in the EU.!



Its OK for the GCs to have Greece in the EU to support their everymove but not us? why is that?


Both the RoC and Greece are in the EU, therefore any cooperation between them is a fair game as well as from all other EU members. Once the TCs accept being part of the EU also (officially), they too will enjoy the support from all EU members.

Turkey outside of the EU can move in times of need she is not bound to what the EU demands...


If what you say above is true, then why would Turkey needs to be officially be granted a guarantorship by the RoC, if they can move unilaterally with or without the approval of the EU.?

when she is in the EU as a full member the 2nd largest she will have the clout to stop any problems that may arise in a united Cyprus,


Turkey may have clout, but she will not be able to act unilaterally, so what good is her clout, if the answer from the EU is a NO.? How will that help the TCs.? What will Turkey do then, go against the EU's demands.?


the EU without Turkeys influence is no security at all.


Wrong.! It will be no different than if Turkey was a member and the EU says NO to intervention in Cyprus. If you don't trust the EU now when Turkey is not a EU member, then you shouldn't really trust the EU when Turkey is a EU member. Very simple really, so lets hear the real reason as to why you want the RoC to give Turkey any guarantorship rights, specially based on Turkey's previous performance as a guarantor. If you can't answer these valid questions, then you are going to have problems in convincing anyone to accept such demands. I hope you can see this rationally rather than making irrational demands, which will not bring settlement to Cyprus in the near future, which will also mean in keeping Turkey out of the EU forever, even though you seem to believe that Turkey will have a lot of clout in the EU as a member, so why would you want to damage Turkey's chances of becoming a EU member in that case.?
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:33 pm

Kikapu you have this annoying habit of rejecting anything that does not conform to your twisted mindset. Without Turkey in the EU we will be bulldozzed over by the GCs if ever a conflict should rear its head and ignored if their should be any internal problems between the 2 states. Spains basque region being just one example where the EU could give a shit about our internal squables.

If Turkey is not in the EU we want security guarantees that will allow her to intervene if we the TCs should ask for help, what is the problem with this? if you have not intention of bring us to that stage? your objections only breed mistrust that you have ulterior motives.

Once Turkey is in the EU then all parties involved in Cyprus will have the same arms length and in times of crisis will be able to use their weight to come to the aid of the TCs or GCs.

We understand the concerns of the GCs, to compromise and find a way that would make both sides happy to move forward I have always supported Turkey only guarantee the North state, if conflicts occur in the south state then Turkey will not have any right to step in not exposing GCs to the their greatest fear the TA and the bad experience of the past. Only if an attack on the north state by terrorists or the south state will Turkey be able to make a move to support the TCs.

Without this sort of a deal the TCs will not dump the guarantee only over time and a building of trust and goodwill can it be erased completely.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Nikitas » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:37 pm

So why cant Turkey unilaterally declare that it is morally bound to defend TCs and leave it at that?
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby Nikitas » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:41 pm

Just got a brilliant idea- if the guarantees are so vital then both the mainland Greek contingent and the the corresponding Turkish one get stationed in the TC constituent state, with no right to enter the GC side for any reason. They can carry out their idiotic spy games up there. And move the British bases there too. All guarantors can stew together in one pot, no need to tire themselves with GCs.

If you think about it , it is reasonable, since the object of these guarantees is the protection of the TCs.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby YFred » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:47 pm

Nikitas wrote:Just got a brilliant idea- if the guarantees are so vital then both the mainland Greek contingent and the the corresponding Turkish one get stationed in the TC constituent state, with no right to enter the GC side for any reason. They can carry out their idiotic spy games up there. And move the British bases there too. All guarantors can stew together in one pot, no need to tire themselves with GCs.

If you think about it , it is reasonable, since the object of these guarantees is the protection of the TCs.

I wonder how many Greek Soldiers would volunteer for such a venture.
I suspect know, if they know what’s good for them.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Get Real! » Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:30 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu you have this annoying habit of rejecting anything that does not conform to your twisted mindset. Without Turkey in the EU we will be bulldozzed over by the GCs if ever a conflict should rear its head and ignored if their should be any internal problems between the 2 states. Spains basque region being just one example where the EU could give a shit about our internal squables.

If Turkey is not in the EU we want security guarantees that will allow her to intervene if we the TCs should ask for help, what is the problem with this? if you have not intention of bring us to that stage? your objections only breed mistrust that you have ulterior motives.

Once Turkey is in the EU then all parties involved in Cyprus will have the same arms length and in times of crisis will be able to use their weight to come to the aid of the TCs or GCs.

We understand the concerns of the GCs, to compromise and find a way that would make both sides happy to move forward I have always supported Turkey only guarantee the North state, if conflicts occur in the south state then Turkey will not have any right to step in not exposing GCs to the their greatest fear the TA and the bad experience of the past. Only if an attack on the north state by terrorists or the south state will Turkey be able to make a move to support the TCs.

Without this sort of a deal the TCs will not dump the guarantee only over time and a building of trust and goodwill can it be erased completely.

You’re like a midget kicking and screaming to play for a basketball team because the ref is your dad… :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:06 pm

Simon
VP, the idea I have of you is one built over years of reading your posts. If you are now saying you support all of the above, then are you saying that your only concern is Turkey's guarantee? You say that GCs have every right to have their concerns about Turkey addressed, but you are not addressing them. You are simply demanding, and then you state that we are inflexible. We are not denying you your right to security. But we want to ensure our independence this time away from anachronistic guarantees that are no longer necessary. Your safeguards are written into law, just like everybody elses.


Simon obvioulsy you have read but not understood where I have been coming from, my main concerns are security and power sharing the rest can be sorted. I did try to address the GCs concerns about security by not denyingthem the right to choose who ever they wish as their guarantors yet again you choose to ignore this fact becuase it doesnt suit your ultimate goal. Your claim for "independence" this time sounds like you want to be given the free hand to do as you wish to TCs, and turn the whole island into a GC state with TCs reduced to minority status. When will you graps the idea that we will never allow this.

VP, we have stated that we will accept a BBF. This is a clear compromise. The only reason nothing has been agreed is because you do not want a federation, you want a confederation with a very weak central government. Essentially you want two separate nations held together by the most tenuous of bonds. You mention the AP, but you just told me you would agree for free movement of people, and yet the Annan Plan did not even allow for this! The AP was not a federation VP! It was far too heavily weighted for the TCs, hence such an overwhelming majority of GCs rejected it.


You may feel that BBF is a compromise but your type of BBf doe snot match ours so in effect you are not compromising you are trying to force a version wherebyy in future you can use your numerical advanatge to take control of the both states and do as you wish again brushing us to one side. You will see any plan that is out forward the GCs will reject as long as there are elements which do not fall in line with your ultimate goal of taking control of the whole island.

The RoC could in fact suspend its citizenship rights for any citizen who is committing acts of treason. It is very easy to argue that this is exactly what many TCs are doing. However, I would not advocate this because it would destroy any goodwill, but I'm just pointing out to you that the GCs have in fact embarked upon many measures of goodwill for the TCs and are trying to give the TCs many incentives to return to the RoC and reject illegality.


Feel free to do so tomorrow if you can, you would face an international backlash that would mean that your mask has dropped and never again could you represent the TCs, which you claim are your citizens and therefore have to provide the basic concessions in order to prove the point. How many Tcs exactly do you know the numbers and who they really are? fugetives? gypsies? tax evadors? treasonists? GC arse lickers?


Both sides are guilty VP, so how does this give you the right to ethnically cleanse the indigenous population and steal their property? This is where you are criminals, and the world has recognised this by not recognising the "TRNC" and stating that the property rights of GCs have not been extinguished in the north. The world has certainly not rushed to your aid because it can see you are guilty. The UN has confirmed this by calling for Turkish troops to withdraw more than once, and declaring the "TRNC" as legally invalid.


I dont exactly see the world rushing to your aid either does this mean you share the guilt and they recognize this by not doing anything to make Turkey leave Cyprus. We have the right to survival first no matter whos land we are on, you messed up big time with your enosis dream and you are now paying the price and wiill continue to do so unless we can agree a solution that both sides can commit to, only then will the Turkish Army leave.

These aren't compromises VP. This is accepting that you are under the law like everybody else. GCs are the legal majority all over Cyprus, so you cannot deny them a say in the island's future. Turkish troops have no right to be here (except those allowed under the 1960 Agreements). And you will not be second class citizens, you will have as much right as anybody else. So what you are saying VP, is that your compromise is accepting the law. Well I'm sorry VP, this this is not a compromise as in the long run, you have no choice!


This is where you are wrong because its not the law we are afraid of but who adminsters it, the GC majority have shown in the past their brand of application and therefore cannot be trusted to have the power that will allow them to manipulate discriminate and persecute the TCs ever again. It is for this reason why the TA arrived and why they will stay until a structure is put forward to guarantee our place in a united cyprus where Gcs cannot brush aside TCs all in the name of the "we are the majority" so we do as we please.

The "TRNC" is recognised only by the country that helped create it. The fact that it is not recognised by the world proves that the law is on our side. Recognition will not come for you because your "state" has already been declared as invalid. Your only option is to negotiate a solution. This is going to require Talat and Turkey to allow Talat to be far more flexible than he is being. As far as I'm aware, the TCs will have some kind of veto, so I fail to see how GCs can dominate you, which is something you keep repeating. The biggest issues are properties, settlers and guarantees. This is where TCs need to show some flexibility and accept the rule of law.


Recognition or not, the current state of affairs is much preferred to what the GCs are offering otherwise we would have all moved south. Veto can you please clarify we have heard nothing of the sort in fact the system demanded by the GCs are wide open to manipulation that would leave us exposed to hostile takeover of seats by GCs in the north state therefore handing over the whole island to the GCs, this is what we have to stop by demanding safeguards and guarantees that will never allow this to happen.

The 2 major issues you refer to should be dealt with as follows;

Property everyone has the right to return where possible or receive compensation where not.

Settlers anyone who has lived on the island for more than 10 years can stay.

Guarantees, Turkey for the TCs and whomever the GCs want.


What if Turkey never joins the EU? What if France, Germany and the Netherlands refuses? You will not be signing your own death warrant VP because nobody is out to kill you. We do not want to deny you security, but we also do not want you to deny ours, by inviting a killing machine like Turkey back to Cyprus. This is why we say that if you insist on a guarantee, (I would be happy without one entirely) let's make it a neutral one which can protect all Cypriots, not one which could cause untold destruction to Cyprus once more.

I personally could only accept Turkey to be a guarantor if it could ONLY act in unison with Britain and Greece, or the EU and UN. The GCs could never agree to giving Turkey the power to act unilaterally again. Even then, any powers must only be temporary. This way, the GCs will not be slaughtered like last time.


You say you do not want to deny me my security and in the same breath you tell me you cant have Turkey but another alternative we all know are a bunch of incompetents and that we will never trust. But I say to address your concerns choose whom ever you want we will accept them and you then say we dent you your right of security.

You are contradicting yourself. You say we should ask the EU for alternative measures against the Turkish threat, but then in the same breath you state that the EU is useless. The only alternative measure I can see is allowing Turkey to intervene only with the EU's permission, and with Turkey acting in unison with the EU. After say 10 years, Turkey's rights shall expire. This is the type of thing that I could personally accept. This should be more than enough time to enable you to build up your trust for the GCs.


Im not contradicting myself you have clearly not understood thats why you think that way, I suggest the EU for you as you trust them we dont. The expiration should ı still believe be in line with Turkey entry into the EU as it would also act as an incentive not to block their progress after getting what you want.

VP, the north of Cyprus does not belong to you, this is the point. No part of Cyprus belongs exclusively to TCs. This is something you fail to understand. This is why you are currently acting like thieves, selling property to corrupt Brits that isn't yours to sell. We cannot exploit our own island VP, GCs only want what is best for Cyprus now. Like I said before, if GCs and TCs put Cyprus first, there is no reason for conflict. As a people, you have the right to live in Cyprus peacefully, just as the GCs do, and once you return to legality, I am sure this could be achieved, just as many TCs live in the south peacefully today.


Ill try and make this simple, who owns Cyprus as a whole? is it the same as the piece of land I own back in my village?

Once you anser those questions try and work out why we cannot steal whats already ours.

Thank you for acknowledging we to have the right to live in Cyprus peacefully without threat persecution or domination, this is what we have in the TRNC pity we are unable to agree the same with GCs, they want us to capitulate to their demands and become a minority in a GC state run by GCs just like the few TCs who have moved south, this will never happen and it is for this reason that we need safeguards and guarantees to ensure we are not excluded from having an effective say in our own country.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:09 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu you have this annoying habit of rejecting anything that does not conform to your twisted mindset. Without Turkey in the EU we will be bulldozzed over by the GCs if ever a conflict should rear its head and ignored if their should be any internal problems between the 2 states. Spains basque region being just one example where the EU could give a shit about our internal squables.

If Turkey is not in the EU we want security guarantees that will allow her to intervene if we the TCs should ask for help, what is the problem with this? if you have not intention of bring us to that stage? your objections only breed mistrust that you have ulterior motives.

Once Turkey is in the EU then all parties involved in Cyprus will have the same arms length and in times of crisis will be able to use their weight to come to the aid of the TCs or GCs.

We understand the concerns of the GCs, to compromise and find a way that would make both sides happy to move forward I have always supported Turkey only guarantee the North state, if conflicts occur in the south state then Turkey will not have any right to step in not exposing GCs to the their greatest fear the TA and the bad experience of the past. Only if an attack on the north state by terrorists or the south state will Turkey be able to make a move to support the TCs.

Without this sort of a deal the TCs will not dump the guarantee only over time and a building of trust and goodwill can it be erased completely.

You’re like a midget kicking and screaming to play for a basketball team because the ref is your dad… :lol:


And whats your argument?
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests