Piratis wrote:runaway wrote:Malapapa wrote:runaway wrote:Malapapa wrote:Like Cyprus, Sarkozy's country of origin, Hungary, endured many, many years of Ottoman rule. It's fair to say Turkey, to this day, isn't the favourite country of most Hungarians.
wrong. HUNs are our brothers.
I'm afraid not, runaway. Indigenous Hungarians (the Magyars), like many others in Europe, tend to despise Turks as a result of what happened to their ancestors at the hands of the Ottomans. Turkey still has a hell of a lot of PR work to do.
wrong againnnnnnn
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of people including existing societies such as the Azerbaijani, Kazakhs, Tatar, Kyrgyz, Turkish, Turkmen, Uyghur, Uzbeks, and as well as past civilizations such as the Huns, Kumans, Avars, Seljuks, Khazars, Ottomans, Mamluks, Timurids, and possibly the Xiongnu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples
It seems you are confusing "Huns" with "Hungarians"
runaway wrote:Piratis wrote:runaway wrote:Malapapa wrote:runaway wrote:Malapapa wrote:Like Cyprus, Sarkozy's country of origin, Hungary, endured many, many years of Ottoman rule. It's fair to say Turkey, to this day, isn't the favourite country of most Hungarians.
wrong. HUNs are our brothers.
I'm afraid not, runaway. Indigenous Hungarians (the Magyars), like many others in Europe, tend to despise Turks as a result of what happened to their ancestors at the hands of the Ottomans. Turkey still has a hell of a lot of PR work to do.
wrong againnnnnnn
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of people including existing societies such as the Azerbaijani, Kazakhs, Tatar, Kyrgyz, Turkish, Turkmen, Uyghur, Uzbeks, and as well as past civilizations such as the Huns, Kumans, Avars, Seljuks, Khazars, Ottomans, Mamluks, Timurids, and possibly the Xiongnu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples
It seems you are confusing "Huns" with "Hungarians"
It is evident you have no clue where Hungarians came from. We even have a common name which you dislike pretty much: ATILLA (ATTILA)
Piratis wrote:runaway wrote:Malapapa wrote:runaway wrote:Malapapa wrote:Like Cyprus, Sarkozy's country of origin, Hungary, endured many, many years of Ottoman rule. It's fair to say Turkey, to this day, isn't the favourite country of most Hungarians.
wrong. HUNs are our brothers.
I'm afraid not, runaway. Indigenous Hungarians (the Magyars), like many others in Europe, tend to despise Turks as a result of what happened to their ancestors at the hands of the Ottomans. Turkey still has a hell of a lot of PR work to do.
wrong againnnnnnn
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of people including existing societies such as the Azerbaijani, Kazakhs, Tatar, Kyrgyz, Turkish, Turkmen, Uyghur, Uzbeks, and as well as past civilizations such as the Huns, Kumans, Avars, Seljuks, Khazars, Ottomans, Mamluks, Timurids, and possibly the Xiongnu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples
It seems you are confusing "Huns" with "Hungarians"
Huns, Hunogurs and Magyars
Origins of the Hungarian Nation
The Hungarians have an interesting and complex history about their origins, that in different versions, historic or legendary, always indicate an association of two main peoples, to which other tribes joined. In the dawn of history, they are directly related to Sumerians and Scythians, with contribution of Subartians, Mitanni, Hurrites and Elamites. After their long "wandering" in Asia, they make irruption in European history in different migratory waves, first as Huns and then as Magyars, but also Onogurs (all these groups related to both Scythians and Sumerians), and mixed with Khazars, Alans, Avars and other Turkic tribes, including the Hurritic Khwarezmians. In fact, their nation is still widely recognized under two different names: Magyarország and Hungária. The controversy still subsists, if the Magyars were Huns or not. There are elements that suggest that Magyars and Huns were one and the same people in ancient Mesopotamia, and that in early times migrated in different stages, thus becoming separate groups that developed independently, though being always in touch with each other. Conventionally, we have to give a name to that original stock (being itself a mixture of Sumerians and Scythians), and either that name is Hun or Magyar is of secondary importance, though the term "Magyar" seems to be the oldest of both. Nevertheless, this term became the name of one single tribe, while Huns is suitable to the whole; therefore, we can define the Magyars as one of the Hun tribes, probably, the Sumerian/Mitanni component of the Scythian tribes that later became the Huns.
The Hungarian parliament have rejected an attempt by people claiming descent from Attila the Hun to be recognised as an ethnic minority.
A spokesman for the group, Gyorgy Kisfaludy, told the BBC that to be a Hun today was a matter of feeling and cultural identity.
insan wrote:Piratis wrote:runaway wrote:Malapapa wrote:runaway wrote:Malapapa wrote:Like Cyprus, Sarkozy's country of origin, Hungary, endured many, many years of Ottoman rule. It's fair to say Turkey, to this day, isn't the favourite country of most Hungarians.
wrong. HUNs are our brothers.
I'm afraid not, runaway. Indigenous Hungarians (the Magyars), like many others in Europe, tend to despise Turks as a result of what happened to their ancestors at the hands of the Ottomans. Turkey still has a hell of a lot of PR work to do.
wrong againnnnnnn
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of people including existing societies such as the Azerbaijani, Kazakhs, Tatar, Kyrgyz, Turkish, Turkmen, Uyghur, Uzbeks, and as well as past civilizations such as the Huns, Kumans, Avars, Seljuks, Khazars, Ottomans, Mamluks, Timurids, and possibly the Xiongnu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples
It seems you are confusing "Huns" with "Hungarians"Huns, Hunogurs and Magyars
Origins of the Hungarian Nation
The Hungarians have an interesting and complex history about their origins, that in different versions, historic or legendary, always indicate an association of two main peoples, to which other tribes joined. In the dawn of history, they are directly related to Sumerians and Scythians, with contribution of Subartians, Mitanni, Hurrites and Elamites. After their long "wandering" in Asia, they make irruption in European history in different migratory waves, first as Huns and then as Magyars, but also Onogurs (all these groups related to both Scythians and Sumerians), and mixed with Khazars, Alans, Avars and other Turkic tribes, including the Hurritic Khwarezmians. In fact, their nation is still widely recognized under two different names: Magyarország and Hungária. The controversy still subsists, if the Magyars were Huns or not. There are elements that suggest that Magyars and Huns were one and the same people in ancient Mesopotamia, and that in early times migrated in different stages, thus becoming separate groups that developed independently, though being always in touch with each other. Conventionally, we have to give a name to that original stock (being itself a mixture of Sumerians and Scythians), and either that name is Hun or Magyar is of secondary importance, though the term "Magyar" seems to be the oldest of both. Nevertheless, this term became the name of one single tribe, while Huns is suitable to the whole; therefore, we can define the Magyars as one of the Hun tribes, probably, the Sumerian/Mitanni component of the Scythian tribes that later became the Huns.
http://www.imninalu.net/Huns.htmThe Hungarian parliament have rejected an attempt by people claiming descent from Attila the Hun to be recognised as an ethnic minority.A spokesman for the group, Gyorgy Kisfaludy, told the BBC that to be a Hun today was a matter of feeling and cultural identity.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4435181.stm
FragnaticDeath wrote:runaway wrote:Piratis wrote:runaway wrote:Malapapa wrote:runaway wrote:Malapapa wrote:Like Cyprus, Sarkozy's country of origin, Hungary, endured many, many years of Ottoman rule. It's fair to say Turkey, to this day, isn't the favourite country of most Hungarians.
wrong. HUNs are our brothers.
I'm afraid not, runaway. Indigenous Hungarians (the Magyars), like many others in Europe, tend to despise Turks as a result of what happened to their ancestors at the hands of the Ottomans. Turkey still has a hell of a lot of PR work to do.
wrong againnnnnnn
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of people including existing societies such as the Azerbaijani, Kazakhs, Tatar, Kyrgyz, Turkish, Turkmen, Uyghur, Uzbeks, and as well as past civilizations such as the Huns, Kumans, Avars, Seljuks, Khazars, Ottomans, Mamluks, Timurids, and possibly the Xiongnu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples
It seems you are confusing "Huns" with "Hungarians"
It is evident you have no clue where Hungarians came from. We even have a common name which you dislike pretty much: ATILLA (ATTILA)
Living for 2 years now in Hungary and now have family member who are Hungarians I can honestly say Hungarians the Magyar as one said do not like the Turks. Ask any old Hungarian person above 40 and he will tell you his opinion
Gasman wrote:I have a Hungarian Stepfather and three Hungarian/English half sisters. And have been visiting Hungary for some years. Mostly around the Balaton and Heviz regions. It's the first I've ever heard that Hungarians don't like the Turkish.
runaway wrote:Gasman wrote:I have a Hungarian Stepfather and three Hungarian/English half sisters. And have been visiting Hungary for some years. Mostly around the Balaton and Heviz regions. It's the first I've ever heard that Hungarians don't like the Turkish.
You'll hear many made up south cypriot stories on this forum. Imagination has no limits.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests