Nikitas wrote:Umit,
Truly valuable evidentiary sources are seldom best sellers. I have just ordered the book and am impatient to read it.
From the clips I learned some things that surprised me- one being that Makarios and Kutchuk both had little control of their paramilitaries. That both wanted to end the violence and took active steps to do so. That funding to the TCs was continued via the patrols and that day to day things like water supplies and harvesting were normalising fast. It all changed when the Americans got involved and the British did all their bidding.
I am sure the book will contain much more deail than the clips and will shed light on what happened during those days.
It's true, many controversial written texts seem to pass unnoticed. I think the author saw it as a moral duty to write what he had been a part of. I feel said that TC's and GC's cannot till this day face the facts no matter now ugly they may be. If the generation that went through this shit cannot come to a general consensus of history, how the hell will future generations?
One thing I find hard to believe is that Makarios did not want Enosis. The TC history books and general public conception on the topic is that; MAkarios was closer to Russia and knew that any sudden move in the way to Enosis would trigger a Turkish interception. Where as the other faction wanted a swift union. Makarios is described as being a lot more patient and sneaky but on the same pathway to the ultimate goal. TC books also quote various newspaper articles and speachs by Makarios, ensuring the public that he is not a traitor to the cause of Enosis.