The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Turkish navy ship hits reef off Greek coast

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby bigOz » Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:37 am

Nikitas wrote:Some references Runway might want to look up- Greek War of Indepence, the liberation of Crete, Macedonian campaign, Balkan Wars, they led to the sixfold territorial gain. World war II and the cessation of the Dodecanese about completes the picture. Next step will be the 12 mile territorial sea extension which will happen despite the protests.

Now give us popsicle's birth date. Maybe some people want to send you a card and a cake.


I beg to differ Nikitas because I am aware how (twisted) history is taught down South!

Liberation of Crete
Greeks did not liberate Greece and Crete but allied forces did! See: http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Crete
http://www.ahistoryofgreece.com/revolution.htm

In both cases, had it not been for the British, French and Russians, Greece and Crete would probably still be Turkish occupied!

QUOTE:
"A series of revolts against the Turks in the 19th cent. reached a climax in the insurrection of 1896–97 that led to war (1897) between Greece and Turkey. The European powers intervened in the war, forcing Turkey to evacuate (1898) Crete. An autonomous Cretan state was formed under nominal Turkish rule, but it was governed by a high commission of the occupying powers (England, France, Russia, and Italy). The Cretan national assembly, led by Eleutherios Venizelos Venizelos Eleutherios (ĕlĕfthâr`yôs vĕnēzĕ`lôs), 1864–1936, Greek statesman, declared in favor of union with Greece, but the powers rejected its demand. The Young Turk revolution of 1908, however, enabled the Cretans to proclaim their union with Greece, and in 1909 foreign occupation troops were withdrawn."

QUOTE:
"On March 13th 1821, twelve days before the official beginning of the War of Independence, the first revolutionary flag was actually raised on the island of Spetses by Laskarina Bouboulina. Twice widowed with 7 children but extremely rich she owned several ships. On April 3rd Spetses revolted, followed by the islands of Hydra and Psara with a total of over 300 ships between them. Bouboulina and her fleet of 8 ships sailed to Nafplion and took part in the seige of the impregnable fortress there. Her later attack on Monemvasia managed to capture that fortress. She took part in the blockade of Pylos and brought supplies to the revolutionairies by sea. Bouboulina became a national hero, one of the first women to play a major role in a revolution. Without her and her ships the Greeks might not have gained their independence. What is less well known is that she was Albanian.

The Greeks, led by local heroes like Theodoros Kolokotronis from the Mani, capture the Peloponessos and form a provisional government, electing the Phanariot Alexandros Mavrokordatos president. On April 26th the Greeks attack Athens and the Turks of the city are forced to flee to the Acropolis. They are rescued in August by Turkish troops but finally surrender in June of 1822 and are then massacred after being promised safe passage. In the meantime the Greeks in the Peloponessos, (or the Morea as it was called), are fighting amongst themselves. In European cities intellectuals and poets like Lord Byron embrace the Greek cause and sway public opinion. The Greek struggle is interpreted by many Europeans simplistically and romantically as a battle between the ideals of the ancient Greeks against the ruthless Turks who had been occupying and supressing the decendents of Pericles, Socrates and Plato. Many, including Lord Byron volunteer to fight and become leaders and heroes of the revolution, known as the Philhellenes (friends of the Greeks). Some sing the praises of the modern Greeks but many are completely disillusioned by the pettiness and greed of the Greek klefth leaders who seem to just want glory and riches. Though some of these warlords are elevated to the role of saviors and heroes in the national mythology, the reality is that many of them were just pirates and thieves looking out for their own self-interest. In 1823 Lord Byron arrives in Missolonghi, to take part in the resistance there, but dies three months later, not as romantically as he would have liked, but by disease. In 1826 the Peloponessos is back in Turkish hands and Athens is one of only a few cities controlled by the Greeks. When the Turkish army returns a major battle takes place and on June 5th the Acropolis is surrendered. Among the fifteen hundred Greek dead are 22 of the 26 Philhellenes. By 1827 the Turks have all of Greece with the exception of Nafplion and a few islands.

But the Greeks are rescued by their own history as support for them in their struggle grows. The Treaty of London, backed by Britain, Russia and France. declares that the three great powers can intervene 'peacefully' to secure the autonomy of the Hellenes. In October of that year the British, French and Russian show the power of peaceful intervention when they destroy the Turkish-Egyptian fleet in the bay of Navarino (Pylos) in what may have been the world's biggest and most fatal 'misunderstanding'. Whether by accident or not, when an Egyptian ship fires on a small boat filled with British sailors, all hell breaks loose and when the smoke clears the entire Turkish-Egyptian fleet is at the bottom of the bay, (where they can still be seen). It is the most one-sided battle in the history of naval warfare. For more see www.greecetravel.com/peloponessos/navarino With the destruction of the Egyptian-Turkish fleet the Hellenes have a clear path to nationhood except for the usual fighting amongst themsleves."

I do not hnow which Macedonian campaign you are referring to (there a few in history - depending on context) BUT the Balkan war involved no Greek heroics either! They were part of a four nation force against the, by then disintegrating and collapsing, Ottoman army...

QUOTE:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Balkan_War
"The First Balkan War, which lasted from October 1912 to May 1913, pitted the Balkan League (Serbia, Montenegro, Greece, and Bulgaria) against the Ottoman Empire. The combined armies of the Balkan states overcame the numerically inferior and strategically disadvantaged Ottoman armies, and achieved rapid success. As a result of the war, almost all remaining European territories of the Ottoman Empire were captured and partitioned among the allies. Ensuing events also led to the creation of an independent Albanian state. Despite its success, Bulgaria was unsatisfied with the peace settlement and with the Ottoman threat gone, soon would start a Second Balkan War, this time against its First Balkan War allies."

Cessation of the Dodecanese
Understandably this is a sour point with Turkey! Tell me how much of what's below you've been taught in your history lessons:

QUOTE:

Ottoman Rule:
Thus began a period of several hundred years in the Ottoman Empire. The Dodecanese formed the Vilayet of the islands. The population was allowed to retain a number of privileges provided it submitted to Ottoman rule. By Suleiman's edict, they paid a special tax in return for a special autonomous status that prohibited Ottoman generals from interfering in their civil affairs or mistreating the population. These guarantees, combined with a strategic location at the crossroads of Mediterranean shipping, allowed the islands to prosper. Although sympathies of the overwhelmingly Greek population (only Rhodes and Kos had Turkish communities) leaned heavily towards Greece following its declaration of independence in 1822, the islanders did not join the Greek War of Independence, continuing instead a semi-autonomous existence as an archipelago of Greek merchants within the Ottoman Empire. Indeed, the 19th century turned out to be one of the islands' most prosperous, and a number of mansions date from this era.

Italian rule
After the outbreak of the Italian-Turkish war over nearby Libya, the islands finally declared independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1912, proclaiming an independent state as the Federation of the Dodecanese Islands. This nascent state was quashed almost immediately by the invasion of Italy, which wanted the islands, and particularly the fortress of Rhodes, to control communication between Turkey and Libya. The Italians occupied all the Dodecanese except for Kastelorizo, which was later temporarily seized by France.

After the end of the war, according to the First Treaty of Lausanne, Italy maintained the occupation of the islands, as guarantee for the execution of the treaty. Following the declaration of War of Italy against the Ottoman Empire (21 August 1915), the war occupation of the islands started again.

During World War I, with Italy allied to France and Britain, the islands became an important British and French naval base, used as a staging area for numerous campaigns, most famously the one at Gallipoli. During the war, some of the smaller islands were occupied by the French and British, with Rhodes continuing as Italian-occupied.

Following the war, the Tittoni - Venizelos agreement, signed on July 29, 1919 called for the smaller islands to join with Greece, with Rhodes remaining Italian. Italy should have got in exchange southwest Anatolia with Antalya. The Greek defeat in the Greco-Turkish War and the foundation of modern Turkey made this solution impossible.
With the Treaty of Lausanne the Dodecanese was then formally annexed by Italy, as the Possedimenti Italiani dell'Egeo.

Mussolini embarked on a program of Italianization, hoping to make Rhodes a modern transportation hub that would serve as a focal point for the spread of Italian culture in Levant. The islands were overwhelmingly Greek-speaking, punctuated only by a Turkish-speaking minority (nearly 10,000) and even smaller Ladino-speaking Jewish minority (with only a few immigrated Italian speakers).

During World War II, Italy joined the Axis Powers, and used the Dodecanese as a naval staging area for its invasion of Crete in 1940. After the surrender of Italy in September 1943, the islands briefly became a battleground between the Germans and Allied forces, including the Italians (see Battle of Leros). The Germans prevailed in the Dodecanese Campaign, and although they were driven out of mainland Greece in 1944, the Dodecanese remained occupied until the end of the war in 1945, during which time nearly the entire Jewish population of 6,000 was deported and killed. Only 1200 of these Ladino speaking Jews survived, thanks to their lucky escape to the nearby coast of Turkey.

Post-World War II [b]
[b]Following the war, the islands became a British military protectorate, and were almost immediately allowed to run their own civil affairs, upon which the islands became informally united with Greece, though under separate sovereignty and military control.
Despite objections from Turkey, which desired the islands as well, they were formally united with Greece by the 1947 Peace Treaty with Italy, ending a seven-century long era of non-Greek rule over the islands. As a legacy of its former status as a jurisdiction separate from Greece, it is still considered a separate "entity" for amateur radio purposes, essentially maintaining its status as an independent country "on the air." Radio call signs in the Dodecanese begin with the prefix SV5."

Now, http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/
refers to only TWO Greco-Turkish Wars (That can actually be classified as war between the two) and this is how it goes:

quote
Two military conflicts between the Greeks and the Turks.

The first, or Thirty Days' War, took place after an 1896 rebellion on Turkish-ruled Crete between Christian residents and their Muslim rulers. Greek troops occupied the island in 1897. The European powers imposed a blockade to prevent assistance to the island. Unable to reach Crete, the Greeks sent a force to attack the Turks in Thessaly, but it was overwhelmed by the superior Turkish army. Though a peace treaty forced the Greeks to withdraw, Turkish troops also left Crete, which had been made an international protectorate and was later (1913) ceded to Greece.

The second war occurred after World War I, when the Greeks attempted to claim territories assigned to them by the Treaty of Sèvres (1920). In 1921 the Greek army launched an offensive in Anatolia against nationalist Turks who would not recognize the treaty. The Greek forces were driven out by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, and the Treaty of Lausanne (1923) returned the disputed territories to Turkey."

The last paragraph also explains why many Greeks (and GCs) violently love mud slinging at a world acclaimed great leader such as Kemal Ataturk... :D
User avatar
bigOz
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:19 am
Location: Girne - Cyprus

Postby Nikitas » Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:39 am

You are a funny guy Big Oz. Your eclectic texts suit your skewed version of reality.

The Turks did not retake lost territory in the war of independence. They brought in Ibrahim of Egypt to do it for them. It was his excesses and the savage depopulation of Morea that led to the Navarino naval action agains tthe combined Turkish and Egyptian fleets. None of the Turkish generals sent from Turkey managed to put down the revolt.

Dodecanese, so wonderfully treated by the Turks, that several islands were burned during the war of independence. Look up the destruction of Kasos, a glorious annal for the Turkish army. And by all accounts, including yours, the islands were populated by Greeks since time immemorial. Presumably they did not want to be a minority and be ruled by Turks anymore. Is that not the point you and VP and others make in here about TCs?

Balkan wars. Actions in Greece were exclusively between the Greek and Ottoman armies and the Ottomans managed to lose them all. Naval actions were exclusively between Greece and the Ottoman navy, as the landlocked states of the Balkans had no navies. Again the Ottoman navy managed to lose them all.

You had better look up some military history texts and see details of the military actions and realise that the Turks, like all people in the world, are fully capable of making some major military blunders. No army is invincible, and no empire lasts forever.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby Paphitis » Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:05 am

Nikitas wrote:Paphitis said:

"I don't know how they do it."

At least two points- the HAF has more resources than at first appears, secondly there is a very tight training regime for pilots so as to keep things where Athens wants them to be.


Yes absolutely.

The HAF is certainly very well resourced, and at the very least, is almost on par with the TAF. It could be argued that the HAF has better capability in terms of Ground Attack (A7 corsair) and high level interdiction (M2000).

Personally, I can't see Turkey defeating Greece in the Aegean, but that is a matter of debate and perception.

What I find amazing is the volume of Turkish violations within the FIR and within Greece's National Airspace itself. As far as I can see, Greece has proven a very high level of readiness by intercepting over 4,500 Turkish Aircraft in the last 12 months, proving beyond doubt that Greece has the firepower to give Turkey more than a bloody nose both in the air and at sea.

Many Greeks and Cypriots belittle the capability of the Greek Armed Forces when up against Turkey, but some people who are in the know, can see that Greece does possess greater capability than Turkey within the Aegean, at least until the TAF F-35s enter service.

I believe Greece's weakness (Achilles Heel) lies with its politics and not with the HAF and HN.

Nikitas wrote:
Often the goal of the intruding flights is to cause a reaction to gauge the total capability of the air defence web, especially its data linking and redundant systems. For obvious reasons the Greeks do not want to do that, so they send up interceptors.

The Turks would love to cause an activation of the S300s that are in Crete to figure out their positioning and deployment. Just keep an eye on how many annual exercises Turkey holds in the waters between Crete and Cyprus. But this is not happening.


It would be pointless turning the S300's on unless Greece will use the weapon, and this is unlikely to eventuate in the current climate.

But I would of thought that Turkey would already know the location of the S300s. In fact. some of this information is even available on the Internet and through Google Earth (although it may be inaccurate)....

I believe Turkey has always conducted exercises between Crete and Cyprus and also around the Karpathos Area, where a Turkish F-16 crashed(?). But the violations into the FIR and national airspace are mainly to gauge the response and readiness of the HAF, and then perhaps to see whether Greece activates any Air Defence sites (unlikely).

Also, Turkey's tactic in the Aegean is not unusual. There are many countries around the world that do this. For example, I have a neat little photograph of an Australian Orion being intercepted by TNI (Indonesian) F-5 aircraft carrying Sidewinder AAM. As far as the Orion was concerned, it was officially in International Airspace (Jakarta FIR), but the Indonesians intercepted the aircraft within 12 nms off their coastline. :lol:

I found an interesting blog that you may be interested in reading:

http://geimint.blogspot.com/2008/05/cyp ... risis.html

Let me know your thoughts Nikitas, once you have read the material.

The S-300PMU-1 facilities on the island of Crete are located at the following coordinates:

35°20'33.79"N 25°10'58.77"E (Nikos Kazantzakis)
35°19'52.02"N 25°13'20.74"E (64N6E EW site)
35°04'02.43"N 24°45'10.01"E (Tympaki)
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby runaway » Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:03 am

Nikitas wrote:Some references Runway might want to look up- Greek War of Indepence, the liberation of Crete, Macedonian campaign, Balkan Wars, they led to the sixfold territorial gain. World war II and the cessation of the Dodecanese about completes the picture. Next step will be the 12 mile territorial sea extension which will happen despite the protests.

Now give us popsicle's birth date. Maybe some people want to send you a card and a cake.


Greece does not have a single victory against modern day Türkiye since 1922.(popsicle's birthday. You shall send the card to south cyprus greek administration) Latest confrontation was in 1974. They were so afraid they didn't even show up in Cyprus. :P You might want to take a map and compare modern day territories to see Greece is a tiny piece of land.
User avatar
runaway
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: Istanbul

Postby Nikitas » Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:30 pm

Greece is a tiny piece of land, so is Bulgaria, Austria, Switzerland, Portugal, and a bunch of other European states your are desperately trying to join.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby Nikitas » Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:45 pm

Paphitis,

THe pressure exerted by Turkey in daily violations and overflights is an old tactic used since 1973. THe strategic goal is to force Greece to agree to a new Aegean sea regime that will diminish Greece's sovereignty in the area.

A hot incident is unlikely. The more likely scenario are disputes over uninhabited rocks like Imia. It would be politically hard to occupy inhabited EU space even for a few days.

Turkey will have to figure out a new tack in this problem if it is serious about entering the EU. To do so it has to agree to and sign a series of international conventions and submit all its claims to international arbitration.

In this case, as in Cyprus, the law favors the Greeks side. So their hurry is to get things done before entering the EU. One way it is trying is by baptising unilateral claims as disputes and thus convince our "friends and allies" to intercede. But even these "well meaning" allies have to admit that these claims are baseless, as happened in the case when a Turkish general said that the island of Gavdos (!!!!) in the south of Crete was Turkish territory. Nicholas Burns' response was "nonsense".
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby Nikitas » Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:48 pm

Paphitis,

One thing about the S-300s. The result of the Turkish objections was their installation in Crete. Often I wonder if that was not the point from the start. Their location in Crete gives greater usefulness than their originallly announced location in Paphos. If you draw a 300 km circle in eastern Crete you will see what I mean.

So was the S300 affair a fiasco or a strategic manouver of some genius? Hard to tell.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby runaway » Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:48 pm

Nikitas wrote:Greece is a tiny piece of land, so is Bulgaria, Austria, Switzerland, Portugal, and a bunch of other European states your are desperately trying to join.


What's the relevance? I love the gc way of diverting the subject. Greece lost Anatolia for good in 1922 and now stands at:

Türkiye Area: 779,452 sq km (300,948 sq miles)
Greece Area: 131,957 sq km ( 50,949 sq miles)
User avatar
runaway
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: Istanbul

Postby Nikitas » Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:53 pm

Greece did not lose Anatolia, it lost the shores of the Aegean. There was no intention to occupy the whole of what is now Turkey for a simple reason: it never had the people to put there.

But you forget that the result is a nation entirely occupied by a 98 per cent Greek and christian population. You ended up with a huge country in which one third of the population claims independence.

And except for Cyprus, can you cite any more glorious campaigns for the "best in Nato"?
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby runaway » Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:14 pm

Nikitas wrote:Greece did not lose Anatolia, it lost the shores of the Aegean. There was no intention to occupy the whole of what is now Turkey for a simple reason: it never had the people to put there.


I don't think Sakarya and Afyon are coastal towns. What the fuck were Greek soldiers doing in central parts of Türkiye, trying to reach Ankara maybe?? They ended up being poured into the sea in İzmir. :lol:

Nikitas wrote:But you forget that the result is a nation entirely occupied by a 98 per cent Greek and christian population. You ended up with a huge country in which one third of the population claims independence.


Your maths is poor as always. Population of Türkiye: 75 million Population of Kurds thought to be 25 million. Population of DTP voters: 5 million. 5/75 doesn't make 1/3. And even DTP leader says they are not after independence. And let me add another figure: 100% of Kurds dislike south cypriots. Enemy of my enemy is my friend thing doesn't always work. 8)

Nikitas wrote: And except for Cyprus, can you cite any more glorious campaigns for the "best in Nato"?


Turkish troops in Bosnia, Kosova, Albania, Macedonia, Afghanistan, Somalia...... Where the hell are south cypriot soldiers??
User avatar
runaway
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: Istanbul

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests