Tim Drayton wrote:shahmaran wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:shahmaran wrote:I'm pretty sure we also have Church's in use on our side, and some in good condition.
I have 2 Church waiting to be fixed in Lefke if anyone is interested
I also remember a Chapel on the way to Lefke which was around for many years and one day it became a roundabout
Shame really, it was a cute one...
Well, I have travelled quite a bit in the north and the only Orthodox church that I have personally witnessed to be in good condition is Agios Mamas in Morphou - which officially is an 'icon museum'. This church is well hidden away and it took me some time to find it. Venetian heritage has fared better and one can encounter churches from this era in the old part of Famagusta. In terms of protecting the religious heritage left behind by the other community, the south - even if not all mosques have survived here - wins hands down in my book. A casual visitor to the north nowadays sees little visible evidence that many Orthodox Christians once inhabited this space. I do not think this is a mere coincidence - it is part of a slow psychological war of attrition that the Turkish deep state has been waging here for decades to remove all traces of Cypriotness and prepare the way for annexation. Contrast this to the experience of the casual visitor to Limassol who strolls along the western end of St Andrew's Street, one of the main shopping streets, and cannot avoid being reminded of the bicommunal past of this city when they catch sight of the minaret of the Grand Mosque.
Tim that is absurd.
Basically what you are saying is that "the number of destroyed and still standing Churches or Mosques" decide whether who is worse?
So if there are more Churches destroyed on the North, that means it is a systematic policy to destroy all the evidence that the Christians used to live there, but when there are less Mosques destroyed in the South, that just means they are old?
What kind of twisted logic is that?
First of all to know for sure we need to know the exact number of Mosques and Churches on both sides and the number of how many still actually exist today, and boil it down to a ratio, and then you can say one side has done more damage.
If you have more Churches and you have lost more Churches, when we have a few Mosques and have lost less Mosques that does not mean one side has destroyed more and more importantly it cannot possibly mean that one side actually has a "policy" to do so and the other side does not.
It just means both sides have been destroying each others heritage and you cannot only blame one side while ignoring the doings of your own side.
Plus there is that other Church in Karpaz up and standing.
You surprise me as one who has recently said:
http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... c&start=40
“Long term agenda working like a charm, what more can one ask for?!”
By ‘agenda’ I understand that you are speaking of the campaign that the Turkish deep state has been waging in Cyprus since August 1958. (For more information see the article ‘Othello’nun güzel ülkesi Kıbrıs’ by Turkish historian Ayşe Hür published in Taraf on 27.07.2008 http://www.tumgazeteler.com/?a=3942699
)
Tim, it was just a sarcastic reply to Nikitas who said;
Independence from Turkey. You know, like GCs have established independece from Greece. But I am not too hopeful for you YFred. Erosion of the TC community has gone unchecked for two generations.
I was, of course, talking about the TC community erroding and many GC's being happy to see it.
I hate to believe that I come across as being a GC hater, I have not once made such a remark nor have I once opened a thread that would attack them, unlike %90 of the threads here that are specifically designed to attack us.
I could not possibly hate any group of people simply for their race or ethnicity or anything else, it is a notion that is way beyond my understanding.