shahmaran wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:shahmaran wrote:I'm pretty sure we also have Church's in use on our side, and some in good condition.
I have 2 Church waiting to be fixed in Lefke if anyone is interested
I also remember a Chapel on the way to Lefke which was around for many years and one day it became a roundabout
Shame really, it was a cute one...
Well, I have travelled quite a bit in the north and the only Orthodox church that I have personally witnessed to be in good condition is Agios Mamas in Morphou - which officially is an 'icon museum'. This church is well hidden away and it took me some time to find it. Venetian heritage has fared better and one can encounter churches from this era in the old part of Famagusta. In terms of protecting the religious heritage left behind by the other community, the south - even if not all mosques have survived here - wins hands down in my book. A casual visitor to the north nowadays sees little visible evidence that many Orthodox Christians once inhabited this space. I do not think this is a mere coincidence - it is part of a slow psychological war of attrition that the Turkish deep state has been waging here for decades to remove all traces of Cypriotness and prepare the way for annexation. Contrast this to the experience of the casual visitor to Limassol who strolls along the western end of St Andrew's Street, one of the main shopping streets, and cannot avoid being reminded of the bicommunal past of this city when they catch sight of the minaret of the Grand Mosque.
Tim that is absurd.
Basically what you are saying is that "the number of destroyed and still standing Churches or Mosques" decide whether who is worse?
So if there are more Churches destroyed on the North, that means it is a systematic policy to destroy all the evidence that the Christians used to live there, but when there are less Mosques destroyed in the South, that just means they are old?
What kind of twisted logic is that?
First of all to know for sure we need to know the exact number of Mosques and Churches on both sides and the number of how many still actually exist today, and boil it down to a ratio, and then you can say one side has done more damage.
If you have more Churches and you have lost more Churches, when we have a few Mosques and have lost less Mosques that does not mean one side has destroyed more and more importantly it cannot possibly mean that one side actually has a "policy" to do so and the other side does not.
It just means both sides have been destroying each others heritage and you cannot only blame one side while ignoring the doings of your own side.
Plus there is that other Church in Karpaz up and standing.
You surprise me as one who has recently said:
http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... c&start=40
“Long term agenda working like a charm, what more can one ask for?!”
By ‘agenda’ I understand that you are speaking of the campaign that the Turkish deep state has been waging in Cyprus since August 1958. (For more information see the article ‘Othello’nun güzel ülkesi Kıbrıs’ by Turkish historian Ayşe Hür published in Taraf on 27.07.2008
http://www.tumgazeteler.com/?a=3942699
)
You clearly support this process, as you are entitled to do. I do not understand why you get on your high horse so much when mention is made of one plank of this campaign, the wilful removal of visible evidence that Orthodox Christians once lived north of the green line in Cyprus.
Trying to be purely objective and based on my own observations as one who has travelled to most parts of the island, I believe, hand on heart, that the TC religious heritage in the south has been better preserved than has GC religious heritage in the north. This is not to say that there has been no destruction of TC heritage in the south. I have made this point before and am surprised at the emotional outburst that it always seems to provoke. I don’t have any axe to grind and I am not trying to support one community over another; this is simply the evidence of my own eyes.
The first time that I visited the southern part of Cyprus was in 2003. I had previously made numerous visits to the north in the 1990’s. My mother, who was living in Cyprus at the time, collected me from Larnaca airport and took me to her house near Limassol. One of the first things that struck me at the time was, while driving along the main motorway you pass some formerly mixed or TC villages in Larnaca province and the mosques in these villages are clearly visible and appear to be in a good state of repair. I know that one of these villages is Deniz’s old village and he says that the mosque in his village has been destroyed. Even so, the point is that somebody arriving in the south is immediately aware that Muslims once lived here. Racking my memory, I cannot think of one former Orthodox church, even one in dilapidated condition, that is visible to the casual observer travelling along one of the main thoroughfares of north Cyprus, say the roads from Nicosia to Morphou, Kyrenia or Famagusta. Please correct me if I am wrong and I will look out for them next time I am there. Yes, as you say, a church is standing out in Karpasia, off the beaten track. I remember how hard it was to find Agios Mamas in Morphou. There are signposts to the ‘icon museum’ in the town centre, but if you follow these signs they eventually peter out before you get there. I have in my possession a map entitled ‘North Cyprus Tourist Map’ which I obtained free of charge from the Tourist Information Office on my first ever visit. It is curious that the only buildings identified as churches on the town plans are former Venetian churches.
Is this all co-incidence? Perhaps. On the other hand, as I have remarked before, if you speak to foreign tourists in the north you will find that most of them have the idea that the Turks have always lived in the north and the Greeks have lived in the south. This is the impression that any causal visitor who is not actively searching out GC heritage will easily gain. It is only a short logical step from here for them to say, “Well, the GCs and TCs have never got along, so why not let them just go their separate ways?’ Is this not one small victory in the propaganda war that is being fought? Is this not part of what you (rightly) describe as the ‘long term agenda working like a charm’? If so, I cannot understand your righteous indignation when somebody points this out.