The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


TRNC established through the use of Force.

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Get Real! » Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:18 pm

shahmaran wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
shahmaran wrote:Plus the fact that Cyprus was rented or annexed or whatever is irrelevant as Turkey had kept her guarantor rights over the island either way...

Nope! Technically, Turkey had and has ZERO rights on Cyprus.

It was the spiteful British that dragged Turkey back into the scene to piss Makarios off.


Did Turkey have guarantor rights or not?

She was gifted something ILLEGAL by the corrupt British, despite the 1960 international decolonization law of the UN.
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby elko » Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:20 pm

What a bunch of lunies not capable of understanding what they read. Let us take "Get Real", he wrote:
That's only part of the story! You conveniently forgot the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne whereby Turkey abandoned all claims to Cyprus, and the Turkish Cypriots their "Tukishness"...

I did not forget anything. I simply pointed out that Cyprus was hired to the British and not sold. As a circumstantial evidence I pointed out that later in 1914 it was annexed by the British. The Lausanne treaty you quoted only confirms what I have written.
Until the point of annexation all the inhabitants of Cyprus had Turkish Nationality. By official recognition of this annexation it was natural to accept that these people also lost their Turkish nationality, in fact they all became British. That includes the Greek Cypriots too.

Quite honestly, you must look seriously at your education system, they are bringing up people who do not properly understand what they read and they all make them think that Greek Cypriots are the cornerstone of the European civilization. I call them the spoilt children of Europe.

Did someone say that I do not know enough of the cyprus problem? Hah, I remember the sound of the first bomb of Eoka. Probably most of you were not born yet. Let me tell you. The fist bomb was placed at the compressor room of the chemistry laboratory of the English School at strovolos, Nicosia and it went off at 3.00 am. on 1st April 1955. I was only 100 yards away at the "School House" Boarding house. What can I say, I think most of you are uncurable!!
ismet
elko
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:27 am

Postby DT. » Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:25 pm

elko wrote:What a bunch of lunies not capable of understanding what they read. Let us take "Get Real", he wrote:
That's only part of the story! You conveniently forgot the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne whereby Turkey abandoned all claims to Cyprus, and the Turkish Cypriots their "Tukishness"...

I did not forget anything. I simply pointed out that Cyprus was hired to the British and not sold. As a circumstantial evidence I pointed out that later in 1914 it was annexed by the British. The Lausanne treaty you quoted only confirms what I have written.
Until the point of annexation all the inhabitants of Cyprus had Turkish Nationality. By official recognition of this annexation it was natural to accept that these people also lost their Turkish nationality, in fact they all became British. That includes the Greek Cypriots too.

Quite honestly, you must look seriously at your education system, they are bringing up people who do not properly understand what they read and they all make them think that Greek Cypriots are the cornerstone of the European civilization. I call them the spoilt children of Europe.

Did someone say that I do not know enough of the cyprus problem? Hah, I remember the sound of the first bomb of Eoka. Probably most of you were not born yet. Let me tell you. The fist bomb was placed at the compressor room of the chemistry laboratory of the English School at strovolos, Nicosia and it went off at 3.00 am. on 1st April 1955. I was only 100 yards away at the "School House" Boarding house. What can I say, I think most of you are uncurable!!
ismet


That wasn't a bomb you plonker, my uncle was never good in chemistry and thats about the same time he went to school there. :lol:

By the way the school house you quote had a name...do you remember what it was since you lived there?
Last edited by DT. on Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby shahmaran » Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Get Real! wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
shahmaran wrote:Plus the fact that Cyprus was rented or annexed or whatever is irrelevant as Turkey had kept her guarantor rights over the island either way...

Nope! Technically, Turkey had and has ZERO rights on Cyprus.

It was the spiteful British that dragged Turkey back into the scene to piss Makarios off.


Did Turkey have guarantor rights or not?

She was gifted something ILLEGAL by the corrupt British, despite the 1960 international decolonization law of the UN.


So the British annexing Turkey and Turkey accepting it is "legal", but when Turkey decides to exercise her right given by the same people around the same time, that is "illegal"? :lol:

I don't have to point out the dilemma do I? :lol:
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby DT. » Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:29 pm

shahmaran wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
shahmaran wrote:Plus the fact that Cyprus was rented or annexed or whatever is irrelevant as Turkey had kept her guarantor rights over the island either way...

Nope! Technically, Turkey had and has ZERO rights on Cyprus.

It was the spiteful British that dragged Turkey back into the scene to piss Makarios off.


Did Turkey have guarantor rights or not?

She was gifted something ILLEGAL by the corrupt British, despite the 1960 international decolonization law of the UN.


So the British annexing Turkey and Turkey accepting it is "legal", but when Turkey decides to exercise her right given by the same people around the same time, that is "illegal"? :lol:

I don't have to point out the dilemma do I? :lol:


Wher ein her gaurantor rights does it say she can occupy Cypriot land?
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby elko » Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:36 pm

DT wrote:
That wasn't a bomb you plonker, my uncle was never good in chemistry and thats about the same time he went to school there.

By the way the school house you quote had a name...do you remember what it was since you lived there?


I loved the joke, so it was your uncle who "bombed" the place. Good one :)

There were three boarding houses: 1. The School House, 2. Alks and 3. Loyds.
"The School House" also compromised the house of the Principal and it was the smallest boarding house of the three. I remember some friends there from Trikomos, the village of Grivas.
ismet
elko
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:27 am

Postby Tim Drayton » Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:40 pm

Britain unilaterally annexed Cyprus on 5 November 1914 by means of the "Cyprus (Annexation) Order in Council". Turkey did not consent to this state of affairs until signing the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923.
User avatar
Tim Drayton
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8799
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:32 am
Location: Limassol/Lemesos

Postby Get Real! » Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:43 pm

elko wrote:Until the point of annexation all the inhabitants of Cyprus had Turkish Nationality.

Utter rubbish! :lol: Only Turkish Cypriots had Turkish nationality which is why the Treaty of Lausanne only mentions THEM as losing it to acquire the British.

But anyway, the important point is that Turkey lost all claims to Cyprus period!

Quite honestly, you must look seriously at your education system,

They HAVE looked at the GC and TC education systems and here's the result... :lol:

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle23.htm

they are bringing up people who do not properly understand what they read and they all make them think that Greek Cypriots are the cornerstone of the European civilization. I call them the spoilt children of Europe.

Why don't you stick around here on a REAL forum to show everyone your knowledge? Ha? :lol:

Did someone say that I do not know enough of the cyprus problem?

That must've been me! :D

Hah, I remember the sound of the first bomb of Eoka. Probably most of you were not born yet. Let me tell you. The fist bomb was placed at the compressor room of the chemistry laboratory of the English School at strovolos, Nicosia and it went off at 3.00 am. on 1st April 1955. I was only 100 yards away at the "School House" Boarding house. What can I say, I think most of you are uncurable!!
ismet

Incorrect again! :( It seems a recurring theme with you... :lol:

The attacks of April 1st, were against the CBS station, some targets in Varosi, and the British Wolseley barracks.

Unfortunately, this is not the C44 were even you can look good… Image
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby shahmaran » Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:49 pm

DT. wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
shahmaran wrote:Plus the fact that Cyprus was rented or annexed or whatever is irrelevant as Turkey had kept her guarantor rights over the island either way...

Nope! Technically, Turkey had and has ZERO rights on Cyprus.

It was the spiteful British that dragged Turkey back into the scene to piss Makarios off.


Did Turkey have guarantor rights or not?

She was gifted something ILLEGAL by the corrupt British, despite the 1960 international decolonization law of the UN.


So the British annexing Turkey and Turkey accepting it is "legal", but when Turkey decides to exercise her right given by the same people around the same time, that is "illegal"? :lol:

I don't have to point out the dilemma do I? :lol:


Wher ein her gaurantor rights does it say she can occupy Cypriot land?


Where does it say that you can torture another ethnic group on their own country?
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby DT. » Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:01 pm

shahmaran wrote:
DT. wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
shahmaran wrote:Plus the fact that Cyprus was rented or annexed or whatever is irrelevant as Turkey had kept her guarantor rights over the island either way...

Nope! Technically, Turkey had and has ZERO rights on Cyprus.

It was the spiteful British that dragged Turkey back into the scene to piss Makarios off.


Did Turkey have guarantor rights or not?

She was gifted something ILLEGAL by the corrupt British, despite the 1960 international decolonization law of the UN.


So the British annexing Turkey and Turkey accepting it is "legal", but when Turkey decides to exercise her right given by the same people around the same time, that is "illegal"? :lol:

I don't have to point out the dilemma do I? :lol:


Wher ein her gaurantor rights does it say she can occupy Cypriot land?


Where does it say that you can torture another ethnic group on their own country?


I don't know!! :shock: And yet Turkey still went ahead and did it. :roll:
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest