Cyprus-Forum.com

[NikosGB23]

Is Cyprus Middle Eastern, or European?

It's the cornerstone of european civilization.

no i know that, i mean geographically, technically it's middle eastern.

[kurupetos]

Thank you Kurupetos,
I think the jury may well decide that.
If and when the fair and just trial is allowed.

You may well be called as the prosecution. However you must also allow the defendant representation.
What is the crime that the Northern Cypriots have committed?

Read the numerous UN resolutions and find out.

[shahmaran]

Thank you Kurupetos,
I think the jury may well decide that.
If and when the fair and just trial is allowed.

You may well be called as the prosecution. However you must also allow the defendant representation.
What is the crime that the Northern Cypriots have committed?

Read the numerous UN resolutions and find out.

No really Kurupetos, please elaborate, what have we done?

You don't pay for the actions of the Greek's do you, Mr. Corner-stone-of-the-European-civilisation?

Which you definitely should as you seem to have supported Enosis so dearly!

[EPSILON]

Thank you Kurupetos,
I think the jury may well decide that.
If and when the fair and just trial is allowed.

You may well be called as the prosecution. However you must also allow the defendant representation.
What is the crime that the Northern Cypriots have committed?

Creating a state by use of force (UN declaring this certain action as crime).

[EPSILON]

Secondly, Turkey took the money from the British when it sold Cyprus to them.What to hell now Turkey wants in Cyprus? They sold, they spend the money and now they want the product back?Strange economics!!!

[shahmaran]

Secondly, Turkey took the money from the British when it sold Cyprus to them.What to hell now Turkey wants in Cyprus? They sold, they spend the money and now they want the product back?Strange economics!!!

The "forceful means" was a byproduct of the GC and Greek perpetuated violence that was retaliated by Turkey, the TC's could not possibly play a big role in it as they were not only far from being armed to the teeth like their oppressors, but also seriously outnumbered.

Secondly, Cyprus was rented to the Brit's by the Ottoman's.

There is a world of difference.

[EPSILON]

Secondly, Turkey took the money from the British when it sold Cyprus to them.What to hell now Turkey wants in Cyprus? They sold, they spend the money and now they want the product back?Strange economics!!!

The "forceful means" was a byproduct of the GC and Greek perpetuated violence that was retaliated by Turkey, the TC's could not possibly play a big role in it as they were not only far from being armed to the teeth like their oppressors, but also seriously outnumbered.

Secondly, Cyprus was rented to the Brit's by the Ottoman's.

There is a world of difference.

Well , we have to find the agreement paper between Ottomans and British since "Greek propaganta" stating the word SOLD.

[shahmaran]

Aggreed!

[elko]

Hello my friends, I am back again to see how the business is in this fine and very humorous lunatic assylum. I see that nothing has changed.

Now who was the chap claiming that Cyprus was sold to the British by the Ottomans? My goodness, don't they ever teach you the truth in history lessons? Do they have to lie to you all the time? This is really a serious matter.

My dear, Cyprus was rented to the British by the Ottomans and later on when the Ottomans sided with Germany in WW1, Britain "annexed" the island I think in 1914. Now learn this "annex" word very well because after some time, Turkey might do just that to North Cyprus and show two fingers to Europe!!

The other point is the 20-80 ratio mentioned in London and Zurich agreements. I think the true ratio at the moment is 40-60 and the gap is closing down very fast. So if you want an agreement to the Cyprus problem, the Comrades (Chris and Talat) better act very quickly, not much time left. I hope I do not have to come here again in a few years time and tell you that I told you so. The writing is on the wall.
ismet

[DT.]

Secondly, Turkey took the money from the British when it sold Cyprus to them.What to hell now Turkey wants in Cyprus? They sold, they spend the money and now they want the product back?Strange economics!!!

The "forceful means" was a byproduct of the GC and Greek perpetuated violence that was retaliated by Turkey, the TC's could not possibly play a big role in it as they were not only far from being armed to the teeth like their oppressors, but also seriously outnumbered.

Secondly, Cyprus was rented to the Brit's by the Ottoman's.

There is a world of difference.

No it wasn't. When your naughty guys joined the war with the other naughty guys Britain declared the rental over and Turkey agreed.