The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Turkish threat, what now for Greece and Cyprus

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby SoSolidCrew » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:17 pm

Did you try to respons my question? Because if you did, I see no answer in it but bullshitty pre-historic-sentences-alike-word-groups of yours as usual.
SoSolidCrew
Member
Member
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:46 am

Postby boomerang » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:23 pm

SoSolidCrew wrote:Did you try to respons my question? Because if you did, I see no answer in it but bullshitty pre-historic-sentences-alike-word-groups of yours as usual.


try making sence prior to making a statement... :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby Nikitas » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:42 pm

YFred:

"Nikitas, 29% will mean about 100000 will have their land back and 60000 will be able to live in the north. That is a realistic proposition. "

I agree it would be a realistic proposition, but every time I read a TC or Turkish official giving his take on this aspect I get the feeling that it is not on the table. Christofias too has confused me when he said that it is possible to have a territorial adjustment that will enable almost all displaced GCs to return and a very small number to be compensated. Try as I might to see how that plan transfers to a map I cannot.

But again, for 60 000 GCs to live under TC administration we need to have full acceptance of the EU aquis, something that Turkey does not want, instead they want a permanent derogation from EU aquis for the northern part of the island. That is why a sliding scale deal should be put on the table, full EU aquis human rights etc, then 25 per cent is fine, less than full human rights and we are talking less territory.

The ideal is a one state solution. But failing the ideal we must be practical and move ahead.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby boomerang » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:45 pm

Nikitas wrote:YFred:

"Nikitas, 29% will mean about 100000 will have their land back and 60000 will be able to live in the north. That is a realistic proposition. "

I agree it would be a realistic proposition, but every time I read a TC or Turkish official giving his take on this aspect I get the feeling that it is not on the table. Christofias too has confused me when he said that it is possible to have a territorial adjustment that will enable almost all displaced GCs to return and a very small number to be compensated. Try as I might to see how that plan transfers to a map I cannot.

But again, for 60 000 GCs to live under TC administration we need to have full acceptance of the EU aquis, something that Turkey does not want, instead they want a permanent derogation from EU aquis for the northern part of the island. That is why a sliding scale deal should be put on the table, full EU aquis human rights etc, then 25 per cent is fine, less than full human rights and we are talking less territory.

The ideal is a one state solution. But failing the ideal we must be practical and move ahead.


you are out of luck Nikitas, this is trully above knucklehead's comprehension...but kudos for trying where others have failed... :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby SoSolidCrew » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:59 pm

Nikitas wrote:YFred:

"Nikitas, 29% will mean about 100000 will have their land back and 60000 will be able to live in the north. That is a realistic proposition. "

I agree it would be a realistic proposition, but every time I read a TC or Turkish official giving his take on this aspect I get the feeling that it is not on the table. Christofias too has confused me when he said that it is possible to have a territorial adjustment that will enable almost all displaced GCs to return and a very small number to be compensated. Try as I might to see how that plan transfers to a map I cannot.

But again, for 60 000 GCs to live under TC administration we need to have full acceptance of the EU aquis, something that Turkey does not want, instead they want a permanent derogation from EU aquis for the northern part of the island. That is why a sliding scale deal should be put on the table, full EU aquis human rights etc, then 25 per cent is fine, less than full human rights and we are talking less territory.

The ideal is a one state solution. But failing the ideal we must be practical and move ahead.


Hey boomerang. This guy (Nikitas) have useful ideas, this is what you lack. If I were in South, I'd like to talk with him for hours on Cyprus and dialogue between communities.
SoSolidCrew
Member
Member
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:46 am

Postby boomerang » Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:03 pm

SoSolidCrew wrote:
Nikitas wrote:YFred:

"Nikitas, 29% will mean about 100000 will have their land back and 60000 will be able to live in the north. That is a realistic proposition. "

I agree it would be a realistic proposition, but every time I read a TC or Turkish official giving his take on this aspect I get the feeling that it is not on the table. Christofias too has confused me when he said that it is possible to have a territorial adjustment that will enable almost all displaced GCs to return and a very small number to be compensated. Try as I might to see how that plan transfers to a map I cannot.

But again, for 60 000 GCs to live under TC administration we need to have full acceptance of the EU aquis, something that Turkey does not want, instead they want a permanent derogation from EU aquis for the northern part of the island. That is why a sliding scale deal should be put on the table, full EU aquis human rights etc, then 25 per cent is fine, less than full human rights and we are talking less territory.

The ideal is a one state solution. But failing the ideal we must be practical and move ahead.


Hey boomerang. This guy (Nikitas) have useful ideas, this is what you lack. If I were in South, I'd like to talk with him for hours on Cyprus and dialogue between communities.


provided he doesn't bleed otherwise the smell will send you wild... :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby SoSolidCrew » Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:05 pm

boomerang wrote:
SoSolidCrew wrote:
Nikitas wrote:YFred:

"Nikitas, 29% will mean about 100000 will have their land back and 60000 will be able to live in the north. That is a realistic proposition. "

I agree it would be a realistic proposition, but every time I read a TC or Turkish official giving his take on this aspect I get the feeling that it is not on the table. Christofias too has confused me when he said that it is possible to have a territorial adjustment that will enable almost all displaced GCs to return and a very small number to be compensated. Try as I might to see how that plan transfers to a map I cannot.

But again, for 60 000 GCs to live under TC administration we need to have full acceptance of the EU aquis, something that Turkey does not want, instead they want a permanent derogation from EU aquis for the northern part of the island. That is why a sliding scale deal should be put on the table, full EU aquis human rights etc, then 25 per cent is fine, less than full human rights and we are talking less territory.

The ideal is a one state solution. But failing the ideal we must be practical and move ahead.


Hey boomerang. This guy (Nikitas) have useful ideas, this is what you lack. If I were in South, I'd like to talk with him for hours on Cyprus and dialogue between communities.


provided he doesn't bleed otherwise the smell will send you wild... :lol:


Same smell as it was in Srebrenica right?
SoSolidCrew
Member
Member
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:46 am

Postby SoSolidCrew » Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:06 pm

And it is really hard to believe that ppl like you still exist.. Against any communication and peace.. Again, Internet is a real fortune for you, since you'd have nothing to do at home all day long, nerd.
SoSolidCrew
Member
Member
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:46 am

Postby boomerang » Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:12 pm

SoSolidCrew wrote:
boomerang wrote:
SoSolidCrew wrote:
Nikitas wrote:YFred:

"Nikitas, 29% will mean about 100000 will have their land back and 60000 will be able to live in the north. That is a realistic proposition. "

I agree it would be a realistic proposition, but every time I read a TC or Turkish official giving his take on this aspect I get the feeling that it is not on the table. Christofias too has confused me when he said that it is possible to have a territorial adjustment that will enable almost all displaced GCs to return and a very small number to be compensated. Try as I might to see how that plan transfers to a map I cannot.

But again, for 60 000 GCs to live under TC administration we need to have full acceptance of the EU aquis, something that Turkey does not want, instead they want a permanent derogation from EU aquis for the northern part of the island. That is why a sliding scale deal should be put on the table, full EU aquis human rights etc, then 25 per cent is fine, less than full human rights and we are talking less territory.

The ideal is a one state solution. But failing the ideal we must be practical and move ahead.


Hey boomerang. This guy (Nikitas) have useful ideas, this is what you lack. If I were in South, I'd like to talk with him for hours on Cyprus and dialogue between communities.


provided he doesn't bleed otherwise the smell will send you wild... :lol:


Same smell as it was in Srebrenica right?


the only safe bet here is that you don't know if you are coming or going... :lol:

how come myeyebalsarestuckupmybum you have no clue about cyprus but suddently you became an expert on another country?...care to share some light here my brainwashed myeyebalsarestuckupmybum?... :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby SoSolidCrew » Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:12 pm

ya bi siktir git be
SoSolidCrew
Member
Member
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:46 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests