Cyprus-Forum.com

[shahmaran]

Well we are nobodies who own half of the island and hold a LOT of weapons.

Call me a fool, but in most places of the world that would indeed make you a "somebody", a very dangerous "somebody" as well

[boomerang]

dp

[boomerang]

Well we are nobodies who own half of the island and hold a LOT of weapons.

Call me a fool, but in most places of the world that would indeed make you a "somebody", a very dangerous "somebody" as well

you hold no weapons..it's make believe...the turks do...or has someone been lying to you...

they say jump, you say when can i go down on you...

[Get Real!]

Well we are nobodies who own half of the island and hold a LOT of weapons.

Call me a fool, but in most places of the world that would indeed make you a "somebody", a very dangerous "somebody" as well

Make that very confused nobodies...

That you are somehow “Turkey” and yet an independent entity, is the crux of your delusions…

[shahmaran]

Well we are nobodies who own half of the island and hold a LOT of weapons.

Call me a fool, but in most places of the world that would indeed make you a "somebody", a very dangerous "somebody" as well

you hold no weapons..it's make believe...the turks do...or has someone been lying to you...

they say jump, you say when can i go down on you...

Well I have done my army services here Boomerang and I can assure you that we DO have weapons here

[boomerang]

Well we are nobodies who own half of the island and hold a LOT of weapons.

Call me a fool, but in most places of the world that would indeed make you a "somebody", a very dangerous "somebody" as well

you hold no weapons..it's make believe...the turks do...or has someone been lying to you...

they say jump, you say when can i go down on you...

Well I have done my army services here Boomerang and I can assure you that we DO have weapons here [/u]

I didn't doubt that...it's the when can I go down I have a problem with...

[SoSolidCrew]

Unfortunately the GC leaderships is all tied up in a masturbatory process and are not paying attention to the territory aspect.

The deal should have a sliding scale aspect, the more the other side emphasises separation and leans towards partition or confederation they must exchange this advantage with territory. Outright partition can be had if the territory is 15-85, confederation with 18-82, federation 25-75, and so on.

28-72 is no deal, for the simple reason that it contains no territorial adjustment, this presupposes returning the dead zone. Unless this proposal is accompanied by full property restitution then it is a non event. But the TC side, as explained by Nami in a recent interview, is that they want 29 per cent of territory with no right of property return. Anyone who agrees to such a deal is a fool.

Nikitas, 29% will mean about 100000 will have their land back and 60000 will be able to live in the north. That is a realistic proposition.

Yes it is.

And I cant believe that those people are willing to accept a 2 stated island if North takes only around %15.

What happened to their 'one island one flag' idealism? Were all fake?

[SoSolidCrew]

Well we are nobodies who own half of the island and hold a LOT of weapons.

Call me a fool, but in most places of the world that would indeed make you a "somebody", a very dangerous "somebody" as well

you hold no weapons..it's make believe...the turks do...or has someone been lying to you...

they say jump, you say when can i go down on you...

They do.

And anyway, Cyprus is not that far from Anatolian coast; and Turks do well know the way

[shahmaran]

Well we are nobodies who own half of the island and hold a LOT of weapons.

Call me a fool, but in most places of the world that would indeed make you a "somebody", a very dangerous "somebody" as well

you hold no weapons..it's make believe...the turks do...or has someone been lying to you...

they say jump, you say when can i go down on you...

Well I have done my army services here Boomerang and I can assure you that we DO have weapons here [/u]

I didn't doubt that...it's the when can I go down I have a problem with...

Sorry I thought you said "you hold no weapons..it's make believe", my bad...

[boomerang]

Unfortunately the GC leaderships is all tied up in a masturbatory process and are not paying attention to the territory aspect.

The deal should have a sliding scale aspect, the more the other side emphasises separation and leans towards partition or confederation they must exchange this advantage with territory. Outright partition can be had if the territory is 15-85, confederation with 18-82, federation 25-75, and so on.

28-72 is no deal, for the simple reason that it contains no territorial adjustment, this presupposes returning the dead zone. Unless this proposal is accompanied by full property restitution then it is a non event. But the TC side, as explained by Nami in a recent interview, is that they want 29 per cent of territory with no right of property return. Anyone who agrees to such a deal is a fool.

Nikitas, 29% will mean about 100000 will have their land back and 60000 will be able to live in the north. That is a realistic proposition.

Yes it is.

And I cant believe that those people are willing to accept a 2 stated island if North takes only around %15.

What happened to their 'one island one flag' idealism? Were all fake?

one look at your red lines tells us you are a fake...ever thought about this myeyeballsarescrewedtothemax.......

tasmania is the smallest state and apart from cousins marrying each other, have the same rights as everyone else...they just get less fed money thats all...so size does no matter myeyeballsarescrewedtomyass...