Cyprus-Forum.com

[shahmaran]

At least, we have no blood on our hands

Now that is a bit far fetched even by your standards Oracle, don't you think?

[Oracle]

At least, we have no blood on our hands

Now that is a bit far fetched even by your standards Oracle, don't you think?

And yet, even out of its full explanatory context .... how justifiably true it still remains!

If we had ventured off to go and invade, conquer, colonise, ethnically cleanse others from their lands, who were merely trying to exist on their bit of space, then we would have had blood on our hands.

But, we haven't done any of the above. We have merely tried (unsuccessfully) to defend ourselves and our thousands of years heritage from extinction by the Expansionist Turks ...

[shahmaran]

At least, we have no blood on our hands

Now that is a bit far fetched even by your standards Oracle, don't you think?

And yet, even out of its full explanatory context .... how justifiably true it still remains!

If we had ventured off to go and invade, conquer, colonise, ethnically cleanse others from their lands, who were merely trying to exist on their bit of space, then we would have had blood on our hands.

But, we haven't done any of the above. We have merely tried (unsuccessfully) to defend ourselves and our thousands of years heritage from extinction by the Expansionist Turks ...

We have been here for 500 years Oracle, what are you exactly "defending" yourself from, and why now?

Plus how does annihilating 3 unarmed villages fit anywhere within the term "defense" ?

This was roughly around the time when the TC's were all trapped in the enclaves dying for years with no means of attacking anything, which further requires you to define your understanding of "defense".

Or you could just stop disguising yourself as the "foolish and ignorant victim" because it is insulting to the level of intelligence you portray in other posts, it just doesn't fit and clearly shows how sinister your intentions really are.

[runaway]

At least, we have no blood on our hands

Now that is a bit far fetched even by your standards Oracle, don't you think?

And yet, even out of its full explanatory context .... how justifiably true it still remains!

If we had ventured off to go and invade, conquer, colonise, ethnically cleanse others from their lands, who were merely trying to exist on their bit of space, then we would have had blood on our hands.

But, we haven't done any of the above. We have merely tried (unsuccessfully) to defend ourselves and our thousands of years heritage from extinction by the Expansionist Turks ...

We have been here for 500 years Oracle, what are you exactly "defending" yourself from, and why now?

Plus how does annihilating 3 unarmed villages fit anywhere within the term "defense" ?

This was roughly around the time when the TC's were all trapped in the enclaves dying for years with no means of attacking anything, which further requires you to define your understanding of "defense".

Or you could just stop disguising yourself as the "foolish and ignorant victim" because it is insulting to the level of intelligence you portray in other posts, it just doesn't fit and clearly shows how sinister your intentions really are.

Şahmaran tebrik ediyorum. Bu kötü kadına daha iyi cevaplar verilemez.

[Piratis]

At least, we have no blood on our hands

Now that is a bit far fetched even by your standards Oracle, don't you think?

And yet, even out of its full explanatory context .... how justifiably true it still remains!

If we had ventured off to go and invade, conquer, colonise, ethnically cleanse others from their lands, who were merely trying to exist on their bit of space, then we would have had blood on our hands.

But, we haven't done any of the above. We have merely tried (unsuccessfully) to defend ourselves and our thousands of years heritage from extinction by the Expansionist Turks ...

We have been here for 500 years Oracle, what are you exactly "defending" yourself from, and why now?

Plus how does annihilating 3 unarmed villages fit anywhere within the term "defense" ?

This was roughly around the time when the TC's were all trapped in the enclaves dying for years with no means of attacking anything, which further requires you to define your understanding of "defense".

Or you could just stop disguising yourself as the "foolish and ignorant victim" because it is insulting to the level of intelligence you portray in other posts, it just doesn't fit and clearly shows how sinister your intentions really are.

So lets get this right. You are saying that the killing of 1000s of innocent Greek Cypriots and the ethnic cleansing of 100s of thousands of innocent Greek Cypriots were all excused, and the only thing that was not excused was the killing of 200 or so TCs in that same war started by Turkey and TCs?

Personally I would say that the killing of innocent people is not excused. In fact the President of Cyprus, in the most official way has condemned those murders. It is unfortunate that you don't say the same, and you value only the life of Turks, while at the same time you celebrate the killing and the ethnic cleansing of innocent people!

Also, you should not mix up the cause and the effect. The big Turkish lie says that Turkey invaded Cyprus in order to save the TCs who were being massacred. This is a big fat LIE. The truth is that the Turks invaded and started to kill GCs first, and the TC casualties came after. The cause was the Turkish invasion. The death of many 1000s of GCs and a couple of 100 of TCs were the result of the Turkish invasion.

Personally I condemn all such killings of innocent people.
What I always support is that instead of choosing force to kill and violate the human rights of people, we should instead take decisions democratically, one person one vote, and always with respect to the human rights of every single citizen. Unfortunately you do not care about democracy, nor about human rights, and you believe you have the right to use brute force to get whatever suits you, even at the expense of the human rights of innocent people.

[Nikitas]

Slaughter of TCs? Can Gqbira and Shah name ONE TC harmed between 1/1/1968 and 20/7/1974? Rhetorical question since none were harmed.

There is a surreal side to this issue. THe community that struggled to prevent enosis and its eradication now has achieved both. The TC are effectively united with Turkey and are rapidly becoming extinct, from a community of more than 100 000 there are 40 000 left after thirty five years of "freedom". Strange......

[miltiades]

We already have established that NOT ONE SINGLE T/C LOST LIFE 6 YEARS PRIOR TO THE INVASION.

[YFred]

Slaughter of TCs? Can Gqbira and Shah name ONE TC harmed between 1/1/1968 and 20/7/1974? Rhetorical question since none were harmed.

There is a surreal side to this issue. THe community that struggled to prevent enosis and its eradication now has achieved both. The TC are effectively united with Turkey and are rapidly becoming extinct, from a community of more than 100 000 there are 40 000 left after thirty five years of "freedom". Strange......

Please confirm that Sampson had no plans what so ever to harm any TCs after he finished with the GC opposition and while you are at it, please explain what the coup was for. What was Sampson going to do different to Makarios, which was following a political and economic suffocation of the TCs. Please tell me he did not have any military plans against the TCs and we can all have a good laugh.

[wyoming cowboy]

YFred you ignorant slut, keep spewing your garbage about the coup and the annihilation of the Turk cyps. Sampson was a puppet placed in power by the fascist regimes of usa,uk,nato. Turkey was only a spoke in the wheel of negating Cyprus's independence. If the GC wanted to annihilate the Tc and was a form of government policy then why didnt they do it. between 64-74. You forget that i lived on the island before 74 and saw first hand what was happening. Nicosia was a mix of Gc and Tc not all Tc voluntarily left for Denktashs enclaves, Tc villages were spread throughout Cyprus, and 71-74 the enclave Tc were going back to their villages. Noone can tell me that government policy was to annihilate the Tc from Cyprus. The plan by the fascist regimes started in 64 67 with the overthrow of papandreou from Greece and a right wing colonel being the leader of Greece. A 15000 Greek division was removed from Cyprus right after the junta took power in Greece in 71 Grivas comes back and forms Eoka B in order to overthrow Makarios(The Castro of the Mediterranean) as described by Kissinger, and cause chaos. The fascist could not use the Tc to destabalize makarios so they brought in Grivas. Hence we have the coup of 74 Makarios overthrow and Turkish invasion. If the Greeks in Cyprus or Greece thought they could achieve Enosis why didnt they declare it in 67 with 15000 well armed troops on Cyprus, and they waited for 74 where Cyprus was virtually undefended. So to answer your question there was no plan by Sampson to kill Turk cyps after he took power or declare Enosis. The plan as it played out was to guarantee Nato a slice of Cyprus, by using its powers over Greece and Turkey. Your statement is null and void..

Slaughter of TCs? Can Gqbira and Shah name ONE TC harmed between 1/1/1968 and 20/7/1974? Rhetorical question since none were harmed.

There is a surreal side to this issue. THe community that struggled to prevent enosis and its eradication now has achieved both. The TC are effectively united with Turkey and are rapidly becoming extinct, from a community of more than 100 000 there are 40 000 left after thirty five years of "freedom". Strange......

Please confirm that Sampson had no plans what so ever to harm any TCs after he finished with the GC opposition and while you are at it, please explain what the coup was for. What was Sampson going to do different to Makarios, which was following a political and economic suffocation of the TCs. Please tell me he did not have any military plans against the TCs and we can all have a good laugh.

[YFred]

YFred you ignorant slut, keep spewing your garbage about the coup and the annihilation of the Turk cyps. Sampson was a puppet placed in power by the fascist regimes of usa,uk,nato. Turkey was only a spoke in the wheel of negating Cyprus's independence. If the GC wanted to annihilate the Tc and was a form of government policy then why didnt they do it. between 64-74. You forget that i lived on the island before 74 and saw first hand what was happening. Nicosia was a mix of Gc and Tc not all Tc voluntarily left for Denktashs enclaves, Tc villages were spread throughout Cyprus, and 71-74 the enclave Tc were going back to their villages. Noone can tell me that government policy was to annihilate the Tc from Cyprus. The plan by the fascist regimes started in 64 67 with the overthrow of papandreou from Greece and a right wing colonel being the leader of Greece. A 15000 Greek division was removed from Cyprus right after the junta took power in Greece in 71 Grivas comes back and forms Eoka B in order to overthrow Makarios(The Castro of the Mediterranean) as described by Kissinger, and cause chaos. The fascist could not use the Tc to destabalize makarios so they brought in Grivas. Hence we have the coup of 74 Makarios overthrow and Turkish invasion. If the Greeks in Cyprus or Greece thought they could achieve Enosis why didnt they declare it in 67 with 15000 well armed troops on Cyprus, and they waited for 74 where Cyprus was virtually undefended. So to answer your question there was no plan by Sampson to kill Turk cyps after he took power or declare Enosis. The plan as it played out was to guarantee Nato a slice of Cyprus, by using its powers over Greece and Turkey. Your statement is null and void..

Slaughter of TCs? Can Gqbira and Shah name ONE TC harmed between 1/1/1968 and 20/7/1974? Rhetorical question since none were harmed.

There is a surreal side to this issue. THe community that struggled to prevent enosis and its eradication now has achieved both. The TC are effectively united with Turkey and are rapidly becoming extinct, from a community of more than 100 000 there are 40 000 left after thirty five years of "freedom". Strange......

Please confirm that Sampson had no plans what so ever to harm any TCs after he finished with the GC opposition and while you are at it, please explain what the coup was for. What was Sampson going to do different to Makarios, which was following a political and economic suffocation of the TCs. Please tell me he did not have any military plans against the TCs and we can all have a good laugh.

Thank you for that. I also lived in Cyprus between 63 and 72. So I am well aware of what was going on. I really wanted Nikitas to supply the weekend laughter, but yours will have to do.
Ignorance and slutting is something you Fascist GCs are very good at.
In 67 you only stopped because Turkey was about to intervene and you knew it. The reason for 74, was that you believed Turkey would not intervene. You were wrong, so eat your humble pie and shut it.