Cyprus-Forum.com

by **Dr J** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:03 am

And what I think is, GCs killed a way more.

...and your proof is?

by **Get Real!** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:03 am

SoSolidCrew wrote:You were just telling Turks used (?) Napalm in 1964... and now it turned out to be 1974...

Both! In August 1964 they napalmed the surrounding areas of Kokkina, and in July 1974 they napalmed all over Cyprus.

How old are you?

You come across very immature… should you really be posting in the CyProb section of the forum or just reading?

by **SoSolidCrew** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:18 am

This news dated before so-called napalm strike to Kokkina. And as you know, Greeks were removing Turks from Kokkina (Which was exact ethnic cleansing)

"Ultimatum

The President of Cyprus, Archbishop Makarios, a Greek Cypriot, issued an ultimatum to Turkey, threatening to attack every Turkish Cypriot village in Cyprus if the air raids were not stopped."

Good solution. Attack to innocent Turkish Cypriots... Even if Turks did it, Makarios deserved it.

by **Hatter** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:38 am

SoSolidCrew wrote:
Hatter wrote:
SoSolidCrew wrote:Idiot, who burnt the 'Napalm Girl' ????

Last ones huh? HA HA HA

Brainwashed society of Southern Cyprus.

Ah, you are referring to the tragically famous 'Napalm Girl' now. The napalm bombing of her village took place in 1972. Two years before 1974.

You should check the brainwashing you seem to be fed, if you want to be taken seriously on this forum. Inanities might be excused, but onanities just make you look stupid.

You were just telling Turks used (?) Napalm in 1964... and now it turned out to be 1974...

If you want to be taken seriously on this forum, you have to stop pretending that you don't understand (unless, of course, you really do not understand, in which case you are just pain dumb). It was already mentioned in an earlier post, in this thread, that napalm was used by Turkey in Cyprus in both 1964 and 1974 , here is the quote:-

The Turks are infamous as the last barbarians to use Napalm against civilians ... long after even the USA had banned it ... Turkey not only used Napalm in 1964, it used it again in 1974!

Since Turkey still stockpiles it, their intention is to use it again ... is it any wonder you are the most vile uncivilised inhumane disgusting beings to ever inhabit the earth!

And your response to the above quote was words to the effect of "we weren't the last ones, look at the Napalm Girl, ha ha ha". To which it was pointed out to you that even the case of the Vietnamese Napalm Girl occurred before 1974 (not that it is central to the discussion, but it confirms the statement that Turkey were the last ones to use napalm).

So why are you now pretending that "now it turned out to be 1974", thereby trying to imply some inconsitency in the replies to you? Either you are completely stupid with the attention span of an amoeba, or you are just lying because you have no other way to support your deliberately propagandist case. In other words, either you are completely stupid, or you are a lying, worthless piece of s**t. You can decide which is which tomorrow, when you are admiring the fly-past of the TAF that I gather is part of the celebrations of Turkey's war crimes (the so-called 'peace operation').

:evil:

by **SoSolidCrew** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:07 am

Read about Srebrenitsa and Hojali if you want to see what war crimes look alike. And they are not some rumors and shitty telegraph messages; they all happened in 1990s.

And remember what Greeks had done in Srebrenitsa. Greek flag was there for a purpose and even Serbs gave medals to Greeks who did participated 'well' -which means raped a lot- in that massacre.

Do not tell me about 'war crimes'.

by **boomerang** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:28 am

SoSolidCrew wrote:Read about Srebrenitsa and Hojali if you want to see what war crimes look alike. And they are not some rumors and shitty telegraph messages; they all happened in 1990s.

And remember what Greeks had done in Srebrenitsa. Greek flag was there for a purpose and even Serbs gave medals to Greeks who did participated 'well' -which means raped a lot- in that massacre.

Do not tell me about 'war crimes'.

do not worry what they did...

Just look at the connection to what Milosevich did to Kosovars and then look at what the turks did in 74 to the Cypriots...The difference is Serbs paid the price while the turls are celebrating the achievement of ethnic cleansing today, in the 21st century...

Happy rejoicing you scumbags...

by **SoSolidCrew** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:30 am

Serbs paid? They paid nothing, they enjoy the blood.

by **boomerang** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:34 am

SoSolidCrew wrote:Serbs paid? They paid nothing, they enjoy the blood.

for someone that has no clue as to what was dropped on Cyprus, this comment of yours reflects your ignorance...

by **Nikitas** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:26 am

According to TC commentators and their own statistics the percentage of TCs in the north now is less than 30 per cent. Give them a few years and they will manage to disappear altoghether. A funny outcome of a "liberation" and "peace" operation.

Somewhere among those kitsch statues of Kemal there should be a statue of a TC, so visitors can remember what they looked like once they go extinct.

by **Nikitas** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:04 pm

A small addendum which is very important- the proposed exploration will not touch Greek areas, either the continental shelf or the EEZ. The only planned intrusions are in the EEZ of Cyprus. Easy stuff, since Cyprus does not have the means to sink the offending ships.

Where is Bananiot to sing the praises of unilateral disarmament?

Cyprus-Forum.com

Turkey to start oil exploration off the cost of Cyprus

Who is online