Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:DT. wrote:a simple publication in a newspaper is enough if an address is not found.
Where in France?
AFRICA will publish them in the north. I heard Halil say that you have Free Press in the north, don't you, or did I get it wrong................. again.?
We'll ban them like they ban ours in South Cyprus.
You will ban
AFRICA from exercising Free Press.?
So what you are saying is, you do not have Democracy and Free Press in the north, since Freedom of Speech is one of the cornerstones of True Democracy, so what you are telling me then is, that Halil is not telling the truth about having Free Press in the north.!
I bet you will not be able to ban
AFRICA from publishing those writs and their circulation will increase by many folds because all the Brits will be buying the paper to see if their names are published in it. It will be like a lottery in reverse. Buy a paper to see if they LOST.!
In any case, if all your efforts are successful in banning all attempts to serve the Brits with legal writs for their fraudulent land purchasing belonging to the GCs which might give them a very temporary relief from the law and from those seeking justice, you will instead expose all the TCs in the UK who had done the same as the Brits in the north. If the law can't get to the Brits in the north because you want to give them safe haven, you are instead throwing the TCs in the UK to take their places who will be a very easy target for the law to get to them. So much for your care to your own people. When the TCs in the UK start facing penalties, they can all point the finger to the authorities in the north for trading them by saving the Brits in the north instead. In the end, the GCs are going to go after somebody, and if you harbour the Brits, then they will go after the TCs instead.
Just a thought.! Since the UN and the EU recognises that the whole island falls under the RoC, surely publications in the papers, in the south should be adequate that the information was put out there instead of a personal writs, if in facts such publications are valid instead of a personal hand given writs are not possible, which means all your efforts to stop hand delivery writs may be pointless in the end. I'm just disappointed in you that you would stand in the way of justice being served.!
Viewpoint wrote:Are you aware we are not allowed to advertise in GC papers? so much for freedom of press, why dont you complain about anything the GCs do?
This will not be an advertisement, but a public notice. Don't forget, that most TCs in the north hold a RoC passports which makes them Cypriot citizens who deserve to be notified by having public notices in their local papers. This is not an advertisement to sell a holiday package in Limassol or Larnaca which then I can understand it being banned, therefore there is a difference between an advertisement and a public notices. It can even come in the form of a "news item" if you don't like the public notice version. There could be a special section on AFRICA that does public service reporting, by saying for example,
"Mr & Mrs Beetroot at such address had a writ put out against them yesterday by the RoC courts and are required to attend the Nicosia court on such a date. The hearing will be conducted in Greek or Turkish, therefore don't make the same mistake as the Orams did who only prepared their defence in English (morons). If there is a no-show by the defendants, Mr and Mrs Beetroot, the case will be forfeited by them and the plaintiff will prevail with a judgement, which will be in the asking amount by the plaintiff." or something like that. I do not see any advertising in the above public notice printed in
AFRICA, therefore it should be allowed to be published.
Viewpoint wrote:How will you prove that the paper is available in the TRNC? thats a dea end as well.
It doesn't matter. It is not the fault of the RoC that local papers are not deliverable in the north. How can you prove for example that, Mr & Mrs Beetroot did not see the publication in the papers while in the south when they crossed over to go to McDonalds.??
Viewpoint wrote:As for the TCs living in the UK, why not try your chances and see the results, the Orams case was specifically designed to stop sale to Brits, what would the case against TCs get you? GCs are calculated cold and materialistic people they will only take action if they have something to gain and taking TCs to court will only prove they do not class them as their own citizens which can backfire, dont ferget you are still not out of the woods yet, lets wait for the British courts verdict before claiming victory and subsequent action.
The purpose of the Orams case was to put a stop in selling off the GC properties to anyone, specially to foreigners. The other reason was to get a landmark ruling for the EU which would extend the laws of the RoC all over Europe and beyond, which they have succeeded in doing so. In the process, all 27 EU countries are all in connection with this landmark ruling. It will serve the EU well I believe. What the British court does is irrelevant, because it is the law for all 27 EU nations and the ECJ ruling has served it's purpose. But to answer your question regarding the TCs being sued by the GCs, why would that be out of ordinary.? Just because the GCs and the TCs are all Cypriots, it does not mean one can purchase the other's property fraudulently and at the same time the other is not allowed to sue the perpetrator. If that was the case, the only prisoners in any country would only have foreigners in jail, which is not the case. If people don't want to do the time, they should not do the crime. Simple really, or do you think it should not be allowed for anyone to sue anyone in Cyprus no matter what crimes are committed by anyone as long as they are Cypriots and that only foreigners should end up in jail.?