Cem wrote:Paphitis wrote:Alpeis wrote:Have you ever felt the idea that Turkey is not willing to leave Cyprus and also has no intent in entering EU. It's so obvious that Cyprus cannot veto the membership of Turkey to EU unless France and Germany supports it. However, they also don't want to see Turkey as a full member. Since the religious government of Turkey is well aware of these facts they turned their face to the east and since 2000s they have been improving relations with neighboring Muslim countries...
That's not what ERDOGAN has been saying.
Here, straight from the horse's mouth.....
Turkey says only full EU membership acceptable
ATHENS (Reuters) - Turkey will accept nothing less than full European Union membership, its EU affairs minister said in an interview published on Sunday, following government efforts in Brussels last week to revive its drive to join.
If I were you, I would rather give a serious consideration to what Alpeis has pointed out here.
You make me laugh, you stupid fuck...
If Turkey was not serious about joining the EU, then why waste their time with all this bullshit? Withdraw from the EU accession process, and be done with it.
Paphitis wrote:
That's not what ERDOGAN has been saying.
Cem wrote:
So when a politician says something he always means business ?? Considering the root words of politics (Poly=multiple, Tic=A local and habitual convulsive motion of facial muscles) accordingly politics could as well be interpreted as multi-faced. That should signal something even to you.
What a stupid fucker you are...
The only thing this signals to me, is that Turkey is indeed serious about joining the EU, but does not want to comply with the EU benchmarks on Human Rights as set out by the EU Charter, and it also does not want to recognize the RoC, which is an EU member and has veto rights on Turkey's accession, or comply with EU directives pertaining to the opening of its Ports and FIR.
Paphitis wrote:
Here, straight from the horse's mouth.....
Turkey says only full EU membership acceptable
Cem wrote:
The reason why horse neighs that way, couldn’t it be simply manoeuvering by Erdogan ? For instance, knowing that such an EU membership is not likely to happen, Erdogan wants to play hero who bravely fights a loosing battle in front of his electorate, so when the talks come to a standstill for any reason whatsoever (not only because of Cyprob), he will have an excuse to present for turning away from EU.
Let me further elaborate:
1) Turkish foreign policy is run by Washington not by Brussels; that much is well known everywhere, except maybe here in CF.
Like I asked you before, if Erdogan was such a Euro skeptic, then why is he wasting every one's time with this extensive EU process???
Washington does not control Ankara. If it did, then Turkey would have allowed the US to utilize Turkish Airspace for the Iraq campaign. The fact that Ankara did not allow this, resulted in a deterioration in relations with the US. I can only agree that Washington has extensive influence in Ankara, and the US will use its influence on Turkey to ensure it remains on the EU reform road map in order for Turkey's accession to the EU to become a reality. The last thing the US would want is for Turkey to become an Islamic Republic.
Cem wrote:
2 The good ol’ USA has been deliberately supporting the pro-islamist AKP government in order to realize long-term goals: a) establishment of a separate Kurdistan republic on Turkish soil thus creating a sort of a buffer zone against Iran as well as against arab countries in the region. b) closer relations with Armenia (indirectly meaning recognition of A.G). This way, Uncle Sam could have a closer access to Caucasus area as well, by way of Armenia after the closed border is opened. Since TSK (army) would fervently oppose to such a scheme, Uncle Sam needed a compatible and obedient ally to fulfill his goal and found it :Islamists.
If what you say is true, then power to their (US) elbow. Why shouldn't the Kurds have their own Republic/country?
Forgive me for not having faith in your statement above, because in all my extensive research in Middle Eastern Strategic Affairs, I have seen no evidence that suggests what you say is correct.
Cem wrote:
3) Now, if such a Kurdish area is established and A.G is recognized prior to the solution of Cyprob, this is certain to create strong reaction in nationalist circles and TSK. In this case, in order to appease them, the USA and its mild-islamist muppet, AKP, may have to play rough regarding CyProb issue.
Highly speculative Kafeneio talk unless you have any material to back your hypothesis up....
Cem wrote;
4) If, on the other hand, CyProb is solved first, it may be stemming similar reactions in same circles, though at a lesser intensity. In this case, the EU will supposedly speed up talks and open a few more chapters to gain time, however, the accession talks-one way or another- will come to a stall again since both Sarkozy and Merkel, leaders of two pillars of EU have both made it clear that Turkey will never be EU member. Consequently, nationalists and TSK may then skillfully manipulate the public frustration already increasing due to Turkey’s ailing economy. Such a possibility however, may go against the interests of Uncle Sam again.
There is no way a Kurdish state will be created on Turkish soil any time soon. I would however be overjoyed if I was wrong about this. This would indeed fanaticise the nationalists, but I'm in no position to engage your Kafeneio hypothesis and give it credence.
I also don't believe that Sarkhozy or Merzel are a serious obstacle to Turkey's EU accession. There is no way Washington will just sit back and not dangle some carrots in order to sway both France and Germany.
Turkey should be more concerned with the 8 EU Acquis Communitaire chapters that have not opened, due to its non recognition of an EU state and not allowing that state's aircraft and ships free access to its airspace and ports. This is what will prevent Turkey from becoming an EU member, and this is why it has suddenly become imperative that the Cyprus Problem is solved in accordance with EU Charter principles.
Cem wrote;
5) At the end of the day, I think that the issue may fast become a conflict of interests between E.U- U.S.A. I know some of you guys believe that the US supports Turkey in her EU accession talks. "There is nothing more revitalizing than believing and dreaming" says a turkish expression.Well, keep believing then !
Of course mine is simply a scenario, more likely a theory, however, seeing some leading indicators, I have some reasons to believe in my theory !
The fact of the matter is, it is the US that is influencing Turkey's EU accession bid, and there are massive Geo Strategic reasons why it is doing so. Most Turks are by far Islamists, and the fear is that the Turkish Deep State is losing its control and that the Turkish Generals influence is declining.
You scenario is interesting, but you have offered no material to support this scenario. You mention some leading indicators which may well support your hypothesis. Well, let's have a close look at these indicators. Allow us the opportunity to analyze them. Thanks!