Z4 wrote:This is now back open again!
michalis5354 wrote:
Question also the incentives of those allegations . Werent they for money ? to take millions as a compensation from a millionaire ?
His contributions to charity had never become the focus of public eye . Dont you see an attempt to discredit him and put his career in trouble .
cyprusgrump wrote:Z4 wrote:This is now back open again!
Oooohhh how exciting for you, see how everybody is rushing to change their avatart!
Paphitis wrote:michalis5354 wrote:
Question also the incentives of those allegations . Werent they for money ? to take millions as a compensation from a millionaire ?
His contributions to charity had never become the focus of public eye . Dont you see an attempt to discredit him and put his career in trouble .
NO!
Why are there no attempts to to discredit other millionaire Hollywood stars or famous singers?
Could it be that there may be some truth to the allegations, prompting MJ to settle out of court?
If he was innocent, then why didn't he defend himself in order to clear his name, but instead chose to settle out of court? I would have thought that a person like MJ would have fought tooth and nail to prove his innocence and preserve his image.
michalis5354 wrote:Paphitis wrote:michalis5354 wrote:
Question also the incentives of those allegations . Werent they for money ? to take millions as a compensation from a millionaire ?
His contributions to charity had never become the focus of public eye . Dont you see an attempt to discredit him and put his career in trouble .
NO!
Why are there no attempts to to discredit other millionaire Hollywood stars or famous singers?
Could it be that there may be some truth to the allegations, prompting MJ to settle out of court?
If he was innocent, then why didn't he defend himself in order to clear his name, but instead chose to settle out of court? I would have thought that a person like MJ would have fought tooth and nail to prove his innocence and preserve his image.
If you try to see the two sides the children came to his home because of friendship , attention that they could not receive at home. There are many perverted parents who kick out their children to have peace of mind . You can not accuse MJ from offering these children what their parents could not.
MJ gave them friendship attention that their parents could not offer and thats the reason they were coming to his house on their own consent , If there is any sexual abuse I dont know may be Yes but you can not accuse only him and not the children or their parents who let them visit any house in that neigbourhood. This is not Normal behaviour to visit any house in the neigbourhood.
MJ admitted his fault or Weakness at the the time and he paid millions in compensation who else would have done that ?????
BTW sexual abuse occurs daily behind closed doors and this is not reported.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests