Erdogan did not need to ask the europeans for anything. They already know what the GCs are like. Apparently whenever the GC MEPs are about to speak or raise an issue all other MEPs scarper in all directions according to one GC reporter.
Super-patriots find the truth very insulting indeed
By Loucas Charalambous
EVERYTHING that could have been said about the Annan plan, which was rejected in 2004 by the Greek Cypriots, has been said and returning to it might be tiresome for many.
However I think that 2004 was a true turning point in the course of the Cyprus problem, as the rejection of the settlement by the Greek Cypriots has, in my opinion, sealed the fate of the island’s Greek community. It is a very serious matter, which is why it has remained at the centre of political debate, however tedious this might be.
Comments made by the vice president of the European Commission Guenther Verheugen during his visit last week brought the issue to the fore once again. With a couple of phrases, the German, who was the Enlargement Commissioner during our EU accession negotiations, exposed the stupidity of our behaviour.
For instance, we report Turkey about her occupation everywhere, while we ensured that the occupation troops stayed here with our vote. We demand the return of our territories but when these were being returned, we voted that we did not want them. We now want to put obstacles in Turkey’s EU accession path, which was opened with our vote.
Verheugen’s reminder that Turkey was still occupying Cyprus in 2005 when her accession negotiations were given the green light, with the vote of the late president Tassos Papadopoulos, was slap in the face of the hypocrites of our political establishment. They all jumped on his because he had “insulted the memory of our respected leader”.
But where was the insult? He had simply uttered a basic truth. Why did this reminder enrage the super-patriots of DIKO, EDEK and Phileleftheros? Is it because, he made them all look stupid for not having the guts back then to criticise their “respected leader” for backing Turkey’s accession course? At the time, they actually applauded Papadopoulos’ decision.
And I do not buy the claim that Papadopoulos’ memory was insulted by Verheugen. What were the good memories left behind by late president that were being insulted? In 2004, by resorting to scare tactics and a host of politically disreputable methods, he frightened people into voting against the peace plan and promised them that he – the great politician – would secure a ‘European’ solution.
He continued as president for another four years and instead of a ‘European’ solution, the only thing he achieved was to cement partition and to isolate Cyprus internationally. This is even being said, now, by the leadership of AKEL, which had made him president in 2003.
Essentially, Verheugen merely expressed the view that all foreigners have about us. This is why not a single foreigner, of those who have dealt with the Cyprus problem, has ever defended or justified our peculiar behaviour. The UN Special Representative, Alexander Downer, is the latest example.
Last year, one of our MEPs told me the following: “They are all fed up with us. They do not want to see us. As soon as they realise that we are preparing to raise some issue, they disappear. ‘There go the Cypriots again,’ they say between them.”
This should be borne in mind by our new MEPs who have already started sharpening their knives, in the false belief that the European Parliament exists to deal with our stupidities.
Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2009