Byron wrote:Kikapu wrote:Byron wrote:Kikapu wrote:Byron wrote:Kikapu wrote:Byron wrote:Kikapu wrote:Byron wrote:Correction and no disrespect to Piratis
PRIVATE MESSAGE FROM BYRON TO PAPHITIS in APRIL 2009
"Good post, please keep defending hellenism. Without hellenism there is no future for Cyprus".
REPLY FROM PAPHITIS TO BYRON
Yes I agree.
I also wish you continue doing the same.
_________________
Prepare for the unknown, unexpected and inconceivable....
GAME OVER FOR YOU PAPHITIS , who is the TURK NOW !!!! Let every Cyprus forum members read your lies and propaganda.
Byron,
Did you get Piratis's permission to post his private message to you publicly.?
If not, then you cannot be trusted with anything and everything.!
Bad move on your part, Byron.!
You are also playing a game !!!
The original message was one from Byron to Paphatis and the reply was from Paphitis not Piratis to Byron . I corrected the mistake in a second post as you clearly saw.
The fact that Paphitis is now denying it is another question .
Actually I don't have time to play games with you today so just answer the damn question.! Did you or did you not get a permission to post Piratis’s/Paphitis's private message to you publicly. It is a very simple question.!
I already replied to Paphitis earlier.
With all due respect, you did not answer my question, directly. You have stated to Paphitis that you did not need a "legal permission" to publicise his private message to you. We are not in a court room, therefore you are not bound by legalities, but you bound morally to keep such messages private, therefore, your answer to my question to you is a resounding NO, which then I will repeat what I've said earlier, which was, that you cannot be trusted with anything and everything.!
Please refrain from such remarks. I would never have dreamed of posting a private reply from someone who replied to my original question!
However when that person goes beyond the bounds of integrity to call me a TURK or a GREY WOLF when he already knows my views on the matter after having corresponded privately demands an immediate rejection.
Furthermore I have not broken any forum rules because I checked before I posted it. As to morality there is no charter of morality on this forum. As you feel so close to this issue perhaps you can draw up a morality list where I would suggest on point one to eliminate the vulgar language that some forum members use in exchange of correspondence.
Merci et bonne soiree
I get called a GC by the NeoPartitionist all the time, so what.? I still debate them and win the arguments at hand but I would never reveal any personal messages I have been sent, and I have a lot from many members. You can do the same, if you think you have the ability to do so without revealing others private messages to you. Of course there is no "morality rules" on the forum for such actions not to be taken such as what you did, but one would think such morality and integrity ought to come from within and not imposed on you by the CF. Sorry my friend, but your only option is for you to apologise for your actions, that's all.!
My friend, your replies are slowly falling apart. I gave you my reasons for what I did, I broke no rules, you have confirmed that. There are no morality rules you have confirmed that too. I have clearly demonstrated and rejected the accusations of Paphitis so there is no more to say. Why dont you lecture him to refrain from using such accusations in the future.
Fine, then I will hold the view that you cannot be trusted with anything and everything. Let it be written, let it be done.!