Paphitis wrote:Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:Also, the Mistrel Short Range Missile is basically useless against fast attack jets. With a range of only 6km, the only thing these missiles would be able to shoot down would be a Cessna aircraft. It would be an enormous fluke if an F-16 was destroyed by a Mistral. An F-16 could fly over 1,000 Mistrals at 18,000Ft and be 99.9% safe. The only way to counter an F-16 is with another F-16 or M2000 at altitudes greater than 18,000FT should the attacking aircraft fear the Mistral.
As a matter of fact, even the S300, Gecko and Tor are ineffective against air attack. These systems are easy pickings for HARM A2G attack. Once they turn their radar on, then it is bye-bye! Good target practice for the pilots though.
There is no SAM or Air Defense umbrella that is able to defeat a modern air force.
Have you heard off Chaff Flares GatTouri!
Bye-bye GatTouri!...
It's the impotency of your brain you should be worried about.
All modern missiles, including Europe’s top 3 (Exocet/Milan/Mistral) have ECCM to defeat electronic protective measures or “jamming” if you like so quit wasting people’s time with assumptions idiot!
Read that quote again and ask yourself why…
Mistral entered series production in 1989 and is now deployed by 37 armed forces of 25 countries. Over 16,000 missiles have been ordered. In June 2001, the last of 45 ATLAS launchers and 9 MCP with Mistral 2 missiles were delivered to Hungary.
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/mistral/
The world is stupid for investing in these and you are smart Paphitis?
The Minstrel is refferred to as "The Poor Man's Missile System".
The kind that real powers can't be bothered wasting their time with because they are inneffective...
Kindly move to the jokes section where you belong...