Time for police force to clean up its ranks
EVERYONE HAS been asking the same question about the policeman shot dead outside his house in the early hours of Sunday. Why, was Stavros Stavrou still in the force considering that he was suspected of corruption and had been the subject of several internal investigations, the last held in January?
And if the answer is that no incriminating evidence had been found against him, then we have to ask why? The murdered policeman was engaging in his illicit activities quite openly. Investigating officers found €96,000 and £4,000 in cash in his shiny Mercedes as well as 247 cheques of a total value of €1.5 million. A man who was afraid there was a chance of being nabbed would not have been driving around with so much incriminating evidence in his car.
When he was being investigated, why had search warrants not been issued? It just seems incredible that the police could not have gathered enough evidence against him to kick him off the force, at the very least. If press reports that he was a loan shark and debt collector were accurate then there could be no excuse for the inability to bring a case against him.
Either the police are even more incompetent than it is generally thought or officers ordered to investigate were covering up for him in the name of worker solidarity. The second is the more likely explanation because it was also evident in the Kitas case, with the Attorney-general publicly complaining several times about the unwillingness of policemen to co-operate with investigators.
This union mentality exists in police forces all over the world, but it is up to the command to draw the line. When a crooked policeman is being investigated there can be no justification for his colleagues showing solidarity and senior officers should ensure against this, by properly monitoring an investigation.
What is needed is strong leadership that shows commitment in fighting corruption within the force. In the case of Stavrou, the command always suspected he was up to no good, which was why he was given punitive transfers – Avdimou, Stroumbi and Troodos among others – but this hardly qualified as an acceptable way of dealing with a serious problem.
The force’s command often resorts to punitive transfers instead of setting in motion procedures for sacking officers for serious violation of the rules. If the procedures – as in the case of the civil service - are too complicated, then they should be simplified so as to allow the police to clean up its ranks, because we doubt that Stavrou was the only corrupt officer in the force. And hopefully, once command starts taking action against the bad cops, standards of discipline and professionalism among the rank and file would improve.