bill cobbett wrote:I think it's very encouraging that we do speak our minds and do speak to eachother. In many ways we are all "negotiators" at the "table" trying to put over our point but at the same time you can't help listening to other views. It's a two-way process.
Sooner rather than later we'll stumble on to some common ground where the hopes of all are met.
...so I voted yes.
Viewpoint wrote:bill cobbett wrote:I think it's very encouraging that we do speak our minds and do speak to eachother. In many ways we are all "negotiators" at the "table" trying to put over our point but at the same time you can't help listening to other views. It's a two-way process.
Sooner rather than later we'll stumble on to some common ground where the hopes of all are met.
...so I voted yes.
We dont agree on anything and do not speak to each other all we do is disagree and try to ridicule and belittle posters on the otherside, which makes us feel better...this is very counter productive and only reconfirms we have no intention of agreeing unification.
bill cobbett wrote:Viewpoint wrote:bill cobbett wrote:I think it's very encouraging that we do speak our minds and do speak to eachother. In many ways we are all "negotiators" at the "table" trying to put over our point but at the same time you can't help listening to other views. It's a two-way process.
Sooner rather than later we'll stumble on to some common ground where the hopes of all are met.
...so I voted yes.
We dont agree on anything and do not speak to each other all we do is disagree and try to ridicule and belittle posters on the otherside, which makes us feel better...this is very counter productive and only reconfirms we have no intention of agreeing unification.
My dear VP, we all love you very much if only for your honesty. We all know where you're coming from, though few would agree with you in many areas, but when people speak honestly and plainly there's a chance some sort of truth will emerge.
What do we want? You want your security and a say in government and all I want is to have the option of spending some time in a Free Kyrenia. Neither of us are really asking for a great, unachievable lot, are we?
X and T left to their own devises will come to a settlement but perhaps not this year, the problem is Turkey.
Now you tell us how we can end this Interference from Turkey so that we can both get what we want.
boulio wrote:Thats fine VP,However not financialy independent of CYPRUS.Or at the expense of original land owners in the North.They offered you JOINTAdministration of Famagusta but you said no.
Kikapu wrote:Once everyone accepts, that a solution can only be based on True Democracy, Human Rights and International laws, the rest of our problems are then just details. The problem is, some do not accept this concept for a unified Cyprus, but would rather have the opposite to these principles. What these people are refusing to see is, now that Cyprus is in the EU and this is the 21st century, there can be no other way but follow the above principles. The EU will not have it any other way which we are part of, even if some Cypriots are willing to forgo the above principles. Therefore, the choice has already been made for us since 2004, whether we want it or not, that a unified Cyprus can only have a True Democracy, Human Rights and International laws. If you cannot trust these basic principles which is the cornerstone of the western society in which we live in, then how can you trust the opposite.? Before any other problems can be addressed, and there are many, first and foremost, the above basic principles need to be accepted by all if we are to move forward with any unification in Cyprus.
boulio wrote:Thats fine VP,However not financialy independent of CYPRUS.Or at the expense of original land owners in the North.They offered you JOINTAdministration of Famagusta but you said no.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests